On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 06:57:17PM -0300, Vitor Massaru Iha wrote:
The results can be seen this way:
This is an excerpt from the test.log with the result in TAP format: [snip] ok 5 - example # Subtest: min-heap 1..6 ok 1 - test_heapify_all_true ok 2 - test_heapify_all_false ok 3 - test_heap_push_true ok 4 - test_heap_push_false ok 5 - test_heap_pop_push_true ok 6 - test_heap_pop_push_false [snip]
And this from kunit-tool: [snip] [18:43:32] ============================================================ [18:43:32] ======== [PASSED] min-heap ======== [18:43:32] [PASSED] test_heapify_all_true [18:43:32] [PASSED] test_heapify_all_false [18:43:32] [PASSED] test_heap_push_true [18:43:32] [PASSED] test_heap_push_false [18:43:32] [PASSED] test_heap_pop_push_true [18:43:32] [PASSED] test_heap_pop_push_false [18:43:32] ============================================================ [18:43:32] Testing complete. 20 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. [18:43:32] Elapsed time: 9.758s total, 0.001s configuring, 6.012s building, 0.000s running [snip]
I don't care or care to use either; what does dmesg do? It used to be that just building the self-tests was sufficient and any error would show in dmesg when you boot the machine.
But if I now have to use some damn tool, this is a regression.