Hi Shuah,
Can you take the patch as is or by removing following from this patch:
- if (geteuid() != 0) + if (geteuid())
Thanks, Usama
On 7/2/24 12:02 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
On 7/1/24 2:14 PM, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
On 2024-07-01, Muhammad Usama Anjum usama.anjum@collabora.com wrote:
Adding more people for review
On 5/23/24 2:46 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Don't print that 88 sub-tests are going to be executed. But then skip. The error is printed that executed test was only 1 while 88 should have run:
Old output: TAP version 13 1..88 ok 2 # SKIP all tests require euid == 0 # Planned tests != run tests (88 != 1) # Totals: pass:0 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:1 error:0
New and correct output: TAP version 13 1..0 # SKIP all tests require euid == 0
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum usama.anjum@collabora.com
tools/testing/selftests/openat2/resolve_test.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/resolve_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/resolve_test.c index bbafad440893c..5472ec478d227 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/resolve_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/openat2/resolve_test.c @@ -508,12 +508,13 @@ void test_openat2_opath_tests(void) int main(int argc, char **argv) { ksft_print_header();
- ksft_set_plan(NUM_TESTS);
/* NOTE: We should be checking for CAP_SYS_ADMIN here... */
- if (geteuid() != 0)
- if (geteuid())
This change isn't necessary, != 0 makes what we're checking clearer.
It is wasteful to write != 0 when you can achieve the same without it.
I can update the patch by removing it. Please can you provide a reviewed-by tag for remaining patch?
ksft_exit_skip("all tests require euid == 0\n");
- ksft_set_plan(NUM_TESTS);
- test_openat2_opath_tests();
if (ksft_get_fail_cnt() + ksft_get_error_cnt() > 0)
-- BR, Muhammad Usama Anjum