From: Eduard Zingerman eddyz87@gmail.com
[ Upstream commit b9fa9bc839291020b362ab5392e5f18ba79657ac ]
A testcase to check that verifier.c:copy_register_state() preserves register parentage chain and livness information.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman eddyz87@gmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230106142214.1040390-3-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- .../selftests/bpf/verifier/search_pruning.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/search_pruning.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/search_pruning.c index 68b14fdfebdb1..d63fd8991b03a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/search_pruning.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/search_pruning.c @@ -225,3 +225,39 @@ .result_unpriv = ACCEPT, .insn_processed = 15, }, +/* The test performs a conditional 64-bit write to a stack location + * fp[-8], this is followed by an unconditional 8-bit write to fp[-8], + * then data is read from fp[-8]. This sequence is unsafe. + * + * The test would be mistakenly marked as safe w/o dst register parent + * preservation in verifier.c:copy_register_state() function. + * + * Note the usage of BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ to force creation of the + * checkpoint state after conditional 64-bit assignment. + */ +{ + "write tracking and register parent chain bug", + .insns = { + /* r6 = ktime_get_ns() */ + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_ktime_get_ns), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0), + /* r0 = ktime_get_ns() */ + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_ktime_get_ns), + /* if r0 > r6 goto +1 */ + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_6, 1), + /* *(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = 0xdeadbeef */ + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, -8, 0xdeadbeef), + /* r1 = 42 */ + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 42), + /* *(u8 *)(r10 - 8) = r1 */ + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_1, -8), + /* r2 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 8) */ + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_FP, -8), + /* exit(0) */ + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .flags = BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ, + .errstr = "invalid read from stack off -8+1 size 8", + .result = REJECT, +},