Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] cgroup/cpuset: Support remote partitions

Hello,

On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 09:38:12PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:

I don't want to add another cpuset.cpus.exclusive.effective control file. One possibility is to keep another effective masks in the struct cpuset and list both exclusive cpus set by the user and the effective ones side by side, like "<cpus> (<effective_cpus>)" if they differ or some other format. What do you think?

Hmm... if we go for separate effective mask, I think it'd be better to stay consistent with cpuset.cpus[.effective]. That's the convention both cpuset.cpus and cpuset.mems already follow. I'm not sure what we'd gain by deviating.

Thanks.