On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 11:17 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Fri, 09 Feb 2024 17:45:28 +0100 Paolo Abeni wrote:
But I'm pretty sure that even with that there will be sporadic failures in slow enough environments.
When the host-induced jitter/delay is high enough, packets are dropped and there are functional failures. I'm wondering if we should skip this test entirely when KSFT_MACHINE_SLOW=yes.
By skip do you mean the same approach as to the gro test? Ignore errors? Because keeping the code coverage for KASAN etc. would still be good (stating the obvious, sorry).
I see my wording was not clear/misleading, I'm sorry. Yes, I mean checking KSFT_MACHINE_SLOW in the caller script and ignoring errors.
Cheers,
Paolo