Hi Mark,
On 6/27/25 18:20, Mark Brown wrote:
This feature has no traps associated with it so the SIGILL is not reliable.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/hwcap.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/hwcap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/hwcap.c index 35f521e5f41c..9dfca2eb7c41 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/hwcap.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/hwcap.c @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ #include <asm/sigcontext.h> #include <asm/unistd.h> +#include <linux/auxvec.h>
- #include "../../kselftest.h"
#define TESTS_PER_HWCAP 3 @@ -165,6 +167,18 @@ static void lse128_sigill(void) : "cc", "memory"); } +static void lsfe_sigill(void) +{
- float __attribute__ ((aligned (16))) mem = 0;
- register float *memp asm ("x0") = &mem;
- /* LDFADD H0, H0, [X0] */
- asm volatile(".inst 0x7c600000"
Same effect, but isn't this the release variant, LDFADDL?
: "+r" (memp)
:
: "cc", "memory");
+}
- static void lut_sigill(void) { /* LUTI2 V0.16B, { V0.16B }, V[0] */
@@ -758,6 +772,13 @@ static const struct hwcap_data { .cpuinfo = "lse128", .sigill_fn = lse128_sigill, },
- {
.name = "LSFE",
.at_hwcap = AT_HWCAP3,
.hwcap_bit = HWCAP3_LSFE,
.cpuinfo = "lsfe",
.sigill_fn = lsfe_sigill,
- }, { .name = "LUT", .at_hwcap = AT_HWCAP2,
Thanks,
Ben