On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 01:47:39PM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
As pointed out by Michael Ellerman, the ptrace ABI on powerpc does not allow or require the return code to be set on syscall entry when skipping the syscall. It will always return ENOSYS and the return code must be set on syscall exit.
This code does that, behaving more similarly to strace. It still sets the return code on entry, which is overridden on powerpc, and it will always repeat the same on exit. Also, on powerpc, the errno is not inverted, and depends on ccr.so being set.
This has been tested on powerpc and amd64.
Cc: Michael Ellerman mpe@ellerman.id.au Cc: Kees Cook keescook@google.com Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo cascardo@canonical.com
Yikes, I missed this from a while ago. I apologize for responding so late!
This appears still unfixed; is that correct?
tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 24 +++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c index 252140a52553..b90a9190ba88 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c @@ -1738,6 +1738,14 @@ void change_syscall(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, TH_LOG("Can't modify syscall return on this architecture"); #else regs.SYSCALL_RET = result; +# if defined(__powerpc__)
if (result < 0) {regs.SYSCALL_RET = -result;regs.ccr |= 0x10000000;} else {regs.ccr &= ~0x10000000;}+# endif #endif
Just so I understand correctly: for ppc to "see" this result, it needs to be both negative AND have this specific register set?
#ifdef HAVE_GETREGS @@ -1796,6 +1804,7 @@ void tracer_ptrace(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, pid_t tracee, int ret, nr; unsigned long msg; static bool entry;
- int *syscall_nr = args;
/* * The traditional way to tell PTRACE_SYSCALL entry/exit @@ -1809,10 +1818,15 @@ void tracer_ptrace(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, pid_t tracee, EXPECT_EQ(entry ? PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY : PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_EXIT, msg);
- if (!entry)
- if (!entry && !syscall_nr) return;
- nr = get_syscall(_metadata, tracee);
- if (entry)
nr = get_syscall(_metadata, tracee);- else
nr = *syscall_nr;
This is weird? Shouldn't get_syscall() be modified to do the right thing here instead of depending on the extra arg?
- if (syscall_nr)
*syscall_nr = nr;if (nr == __NR_getpid) change_syscall(_metadata, tracee, __NR_getppid, 0); @@ -1889,9 +1903,10 @@ TEST_F(TRACE_syscall, ptrace_syscall_redirected) TEST_F(TRACE_syscall, ptrace_syscall_errno) {
- int syscall_nr = -1; /* Swap SECCOMP_RET_TRACE tracer for PTRACE_SYSCALL tracer. */ teardown_trace_fixture(_metadata, self->tracer);
- self->tracer = setup_trace_fixture(_metadata, tracer_ptrace, NULL,
- self->tracer = setup_trace_fixture(_metadata, tracer_ptrace, &syscall_nr, true);
/* Tracer should skip the open syscall, resulting in ESRCH. */ @@ -1900,9 +1915,10 @@ TEST_F(TRACE_syscall, ptrace_syscall_errno) TEST_F(TRACE_syscall, ptrace_syscall_faked) {
- int syscall_nr = -1; /* Swap SECCOMP_RET_TRACE tracer for PTRACE_SYSCALL tracer. */ teardown_trace_fixture(_metadata, self->tracer);
- self->tracer = setup_trace_fixture(_metadata, tracer_ptrace, NULL,
- self->tracer = setup_trace_fixture(_metadata, tracer_ptrace, &syscall_nr, true);
/* Tracer should skip the gettid syscall, resulting fake pid. */ -- 2.25.1