Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] selftests/bpf: Add tests verifying bpf lsm userns_create hook

On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 12:28:07PM -0500, Frederick Lawler wrote:

The LSM hook userns_create was introduced to provide LSM's an opportunity to block or allow unprivileged user namespace creation. This test serves two purposes: it provides a test eBPF implementation, and tests the hook successfully blocks or allows user namespace creation.

This tests 4 cases:

    1. Unattached bpf program does not block unpriv user namespace
       creation.
    2. Attached bpf program allows user namespace creation given
       CAP_SYS_ADMIN privileges.
    3. Attached bpf program denies user namespace creation for a
       user without CAP_SYS_ADMIN.
    4. The sleepable implementation loads

Signed-off-by: Frederick Lawler fred@cloudflare.com

---

The generic deny_namespace file name is used for future namespace expansion. I didn't want to limit these files to just the create_user_ns hook. Changes since v2:

• Rename create_user_ns hook to userns_create

Changes since v1:

• Introduce this patch

---

.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/deny_namespace.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_deny_namespace.c | 39 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 127 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/deny_namespace.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_deny_namespace.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/deny_namespace.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/deny_namespace.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..9e4714295008 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/deny_namespace.c @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +#define _GNU_SOURCE +#include <test_progs.h> +#include "test_deny_namespace.skel.h" +#include <sched.h> +#include "cap_helpers.h"

+#define STACK_SIZE (1024 * 1024)

Does the child need 1M stack space ?

+static char child_stack[STACK_SIZE];

+int clone_callback(void *arg)

static

+{

• return 0;

+}

+static int create_new_user_ns(void) +{

• int status;
• pid_t cpid;
• cpid = clone(clone_callback, child_stack + STACK_SIZE,

•      CLONE_NEWUSER | SIGCHLD, NULL);
  

• if (cpid == -1)

• return errno;
  

• if (cpid == 0)

Not an expert in clone() call and it is not clear what 0 return value mean from the man page. Could you explain ?

• return 0;
  

• waitpid(cpid, &status, 0);
• if (WIFEXITED(status))

• return WEXITSTATUS(status);
  

• return -1;

+}

+static void test_userns_create_bpf(void) +{

• __u32 cap_mask = 1ULL << CAP_SYS_ADMIN;
• __u64 old_caps = 0;
• ASSERT_OK(create_new_user_ns(), "priv new user ns");

Does it need to enable CAP_SYS_ADMIN first ?

• cap_disable_effective(cap_mask, &old_caps);
• ASSERT_EQ(create_new_user_ns(), EPERM, "unpriv new user ns");
• if (cap_mask & old_caps)

• cap_enable_effective(cap_mask, NULL);
  

+}

+static void test_unpriv_userns_create_no_bpf(void) +{

• __u32 cap_mask = 1ULL << CAP_SYS_ADMIN;
• __u64 old_caps = 0;
• cap_disable_effective(cap_mask, &old_caps);
• ASSERT_OK(create_new_user_ns(), "no-bpf unpriv new user ns");
• if (cap_mask & old_caps)

• cap_enable_effective(cap_mask, NULL);
  

+}

+void test_deny_namespace(void) +{

• struct test_deny_namespace *skel = NULL;
• int err;
• if (test__start_subtest("unpriv_userns_create_no_bpf"))

• test_unpriv_userns_create_no_bpf();
  

• skel = test_deny_namespace__open_and_load();
• if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel load"))

• goto close_prog;
  

• err = test_deny_namespace__attach(skel);
• if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "attach"))

• goto close_prog;
  

• if (test__start_subtest("userns_create_bpf"))

• test_userns_create_bpf();
  

• test_deny_namespace__detach(skel);

+close_prog:

• test_deny_namespace__destroy(skel);

+} diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_deny_namespace.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_deny_namespace.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..9ec9dabc8372 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_deny_namespace.c @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +#include <linux/bpf.h> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h> +#include <errno.h> +#include <linux/capability.h>

+struct kernel_cap_struct {

• __u32 cap[_LINUX_CAPABILITY_U32S_3];

+} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));

+struct cred {

• struct kernel_cap_struct cap_effective;

+} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));

+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";

+SEC("lsm/userns_create") +int BPF_PROG(test_userns_create, const struct cred *cred, int ret) +{

• struct kernel_cap_struct caps = cred->cap_effective;
• int cap_index = CAP_TO_INDEX(CAP_SYS_ADMIN);
• __u32 cap_mask = CAP_TO_MASK(CAP_SYS_ADMIN);
• if (ret)

• return 0;
  

• ret = -EPERM;
• if (caps.cap[cap_index] & cap_mask)

• return 0;
  

• return -EPERM;

+}

+SEC("lsm.s/userns_create") +int BPF_PROG(test_sleepable_userns_create, const struct cred *cred, int ret) +{

An empty program is weird. If the intention is to ensure a sleepable program can attach to userns_create, move the test logic here and remove the non-sleepable program above.

• return 0;

+}

2.30.2