On 24 Aug 10:12, Meng Li wrote:
Preferred core rankings can be changed dynamically by the platform based on the workload and platform conditions and accounting for thermals and aging. When this occurs, cpu priority need to be set.
Signed-off-by: Meng Li li.meng@amd.com
drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/amd-pstate.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c index d02305675f66..8a8e4ecb1b5c 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c @@ -315,6 +315,7 @@ static int pstate_init_perf(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata) WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->nominal_perf, AMD_CPPC_NOMINAL_PERF(cap1)); WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_perf, AMD_CPPC_LOWNONLIN_PERF(cap1)); WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_perf, AMD_CPPC_LOWEST_PERF(cap1));
- WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_highest_perf, AMD_CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF(cap1));
return 0; } @@ -336,6 +337,7 @@ static int cppc_init_perf(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata) WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_perf, cppc_perf.lowest_nonlinear_perf); WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->lowest_perf, cppc_perf.lowest_perf);
- WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_highest_perf, cppc_perf.highest_perf);
if (cppc_state == AMD_PSTATE_ACTIVE) return 0; @@ -744,6 +746,34 @@ static void amd_pstate_init_prefcore(void) schedule_work(&sched_prefcore_work); } +static void amd_pstate_update_highest_perf(unsigned int cpu) +{
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
- struct amd_cpudata *cpudata;
- u32 prev_high = 0, cur_high = 0;
- u64 highest_perf;
- int ret;
- if (!prefcore)
return;- ret = amd_pstate_get_highest_perf(cpu, &highest_perf);
- if (ret)
return;- policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
- cpudata = policy->driver_data;
- cur_high = highest_perf;
- prev_high = READ_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_highest_perf);
- if (prev_high != cur_high) {
WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_highest_perf, cur_high);sched_set_itmt_core_prio(cur_high, cpu);- }
- cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
+}
static int amd_pstate_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { int min_freq, max_freq, nominal_freq, lowest_nonlinear_freq, ret; @@ -1468,6 +1498,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver amd_pstate_driver = { .suspend = amd_pstate_cpu_suspend, .resume = amd_pstate_cpu_resume, .set_boost = amd_pstate_set_boost,
- .update_highest_perf = amd_pstate_update_highest_perf, .name = "amd-pstate", .attr = amd_pstate_attr,
}; @@ -1482,6 +1513,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver amd_pstate_epp_driver = { .online = amd_pstate_epp_cpu_online, .suspend = amd_pstate_epp_suspend, .resume = amd_pstate_epp_resume,
- .update_highest_perf = amd_pstate_update_highest_perf, .name = "amd-pstate-epp", .attr = amd_pstate_epp_attr,
If we intend to use the existing `update_limits` callback then this patch needed to update. Otherwise looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Wyes Karny wyes.karny@amd.com
}; diff --git a/include/linux/amd-pstate.h b/include/linux/amd-pstate.h index 446394f84606..fa86bc953d3e 100644 --- a/include/linux/amd-pstate.h +++ b/include/linux/amd-pstate.h @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ struct amd_cpudata { u32 nominal_perf; u32 lowest_nonlinear_perf; u32 lowest_perf;
- u32 prefcore_highest_perf;
u32 max_freq; u32 min_freq; -- 2.34.1