On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 8:56 AM Andre Przywara andre.przywara@arm.com wrote:
As cachestat is a new syscall, it won't be available on older kernels, for instance those running on a build machine. In this case, a run reports all tests as "not ok" at the moment.
Interesting - I was under the assumption that if you backported the selftests for cachestat, you would also backport the syscall's implementation and wiring.
But yeah, I guess if you build with !CONFIG_CACHESTAT_SYSCALL, these tests would fail.
Test for the cachestat syscall availability first, before doing further tests, and bail out early with a TAP SKIP comment.
This also uses the opportunity to add the proper TAP headers, and add one check for the syscall error handling (illegal file descriptor).
Thanks for the addition!
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara andre.przywara@arm.com
.../selftests/cachestat/test_cachestat.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cachestat/test_cachestat.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cachestat/test_cachestat.c index a5a4ac8dcb76c..77620e7ecf562 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cachestat/test_cachestat.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cachestat/test_cachestat.c @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
#include "../kselftest.h"
+#define NR_TESTS 8
static const char * const dev_files[] = { "/dev/zero", "/dev/null", "/dev/urandom", "/proc/version", "/proc" @@ -235,7 +237,25 @@ bool test_cachestat_shmem(void)
int main(void) {
int ret = 0;
int ret;
ksft_print_header();
ret = syscall(__NR_cachestat, -1, NULL, NULL, 0);
if (ret == -1 && errno == ENOSYS) {
nit: if (ret && errno == ENOSYS) sounds cleaner, but up to you.
printf("1..0 # Skipped: cachestat syscall not available\n");
nit: perhaps ksft_print_msg()?
return KSFT_SKIP;
}
ksft_set_plan(NR_TESTS);
if (ret == -1 && errno == EBADF) {
ksft_test_result_pass("bad file descriptor recognized\n");
ret = 0;
} else {
ksft_test_result_fail("bad file descriptor ignored\n");
ret = 1;
}
Nice!
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) { const char *dev_filename = dev_files[i];
-- 2.25.1
Nitpicking aside: Acked-by: Nhat Pham nphamcs@gmail.com