On Tue, 2023-01-31 at 08:33 -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 8:06 AM Andrei Gherzan andrei.gherzan@canonical.com wrote:
"udpgro_bench.sh" invokes udpgso_bench_rx/udpgso_bench_tx programs subsequently and while doing so, there is a chance that the rx one is not ready to accept socket connections. This racing bug could fail the test with at least one of the following:
./udpgso_bench_tx: connect: Connection refused ./udpgso_bench_tx: sendmsg: Connection refused ./udpgso_bench_tx: write: Connection refused
This change addresses this by making udpgro_bench.sh wait for the rx program to be ready before firing off the tx one - with an exponential back off algorithm from 1s to 10s.
Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan andrei.gherzan@canonical.com
please CC: reviewers of previous revisions on new revisions
also for upcoming patches: please clearly mark net or net-next.
tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgso_bench.sh | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgso_bench.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgso_bench.sh index dc932fd65363..20b5db8fcbde 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgso_bench.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgso_bench.sh @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ readonly GREEN='\033[0;92m' readonly YELLOW='\033[0;33m' readonly RED='\033[0;31m' readonly NC='\033[0m' # No Color +readonly TESTPORT=8000 # Keep this in sync with udpgso_bench_rx/tx
then also pass explicit -p argument to the processes to keep all three consistent
readonly KSFT_PASS=0 readonly KSFT_FAIL=1 @@ -56,10 +57,27 @@ trap wake_children EXIT
run_one() { local -r args=$@
local -r init_delay_s=1
local -r max_delay_s=10
local delay_s=0
local nr_socks=0 ./udpgso_bench_rx & ./udpgso_bench_rx -t &
# Wait for the above test program to get ready to receive connections.
delay_s="${init_delay_s}"
while [ "$delay_s" -lt "$max_delay_s" ]; do
nr_socks="$(ss -lnHi | grep -c "\*:${TESTPORT}")"
[ "$nr_socks" -eq 2 ] && break
sleep "$delay_s"
delay="$((delay*2))"
I don't think we need exponential back-off for something this simple
Agreed. Additionally you could use constant, sub-second delay (say 0.1) to keep the runtime delta relatively low.
Cheers,
Paolo