Hi, Thomas
As we want to enable compiler warnings in the future these would be reported as unused functions.
If we need them in the future they are easy to recreate from their still existing siblings.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh linux@weissschuh.net
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 99 ---------------------------- 1 file changed, 99 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c index 03b1d30f5507..53e2d448eded 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c @@ -161,31 +161,6 @@ static void result(int llen, enum RESULT r)
- of failures, thus either 0 or 1.
*/ -#define EXPECT_ZR(cond, expr) \
- do { if (!(cond)) result(llen, SKIPPED); else ret += expect_zr(expr, llen); } while (0)
-static int expect_zr(int expr, int llen) -{
Why not a simple 'static __attribute__((unused))' line, then, no need to add them again next time.
-static int expect_zr(int expr, int llen) +static __attribute__((unused)) +int expect_zr(int expr, int llen) {
Thanks, Zhangjin
- int ret = !(expr == 0);
- llen += printf(" = %d ", expr);
- result(llen, ret ? FAIL : OK);
- return ret;
-}
-#define EXPECT_NZ(cond, expr, val) \
- do { if (!(cond)) result(llen, SKIPPED); else ret += expect_nz(expr, llen; } while (0)
-static int expect_nz(int expr, int llen) -{
- int ret = !(expr != 0);
- llen += printf(" = %d ", expr);
- result(llen, ret ? FAIL : OK);
- return ret;
-}
[...]
2.41.0