On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 12:50 AM Sandipan Das sandipan@linux.ibm.com wrote:
On 12/02/20 3:01 am, Mina Almasry wrote:
The tests use both shared and private mapped hugetlb memory, and monitors the hugetlb usage counter as well as the hugetlb reservation counter. They test different configurations such as hugetlb memory usage via hugetlbfs, or MAP_HUGETLB, or shmget/shmat, and with and without MAP_POPULATE.
Also add test for hugetlb reservation reparenting, since this is a subtle issue.
Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry almasrymina@google.com Cc: sandipan@linux.ibm.com
Hi folks,
Sandipan provided a Tested-by but this is more or less the only patch in the series that is awaiting review. Can someone take a look?
Shuah, you started reviewing this months ago and I addressed the comments. Maybe you can take another look?
Thanks in advance!