On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 02:39:08PM -0400, Zi Yan wrote: [...]
+static int gather_folio_orders(char *vaddr_start, size_t len,
int pagemap_file, int kpageflags_file,
int orders[], int nr_orders)
+{
- uint64_t page_flags = 0;
- int cur_order = -1;
- char *vaddr;
- if (!pagemap_file || !kpageflags_file)
return -1;
- if (nr_orders <= 0)
return -1;
- for (vaddr = vaddr_start; vaddr < vaddr_start + len; ) {
char *next_folio_vaddr;
int status;
if (get_page_flags(vaddr, pagemap_file, kpageflags_file, &page_flags))
return -1;
/* all order-0 pages with possible false postive (non folio) */
if (!(page_flags & (KPF_COMPOUND_HEAD | KPF_COMPOUND_TAIL))) {
orders[0]++;
vaddr += psize();
continue;
}
/* skip non thp compound pages */
if (!(page_flags & KPF_THP)) {
vaddr += psize();
continue;
}
/* vpn points to part of a THP at this point */
if (page_flags & KPF_COMPOUND_HEAD)
cur_order = 1;
else {
/* not a head nor a tail in a THP? */
if (!(page_flags & KPF_COMPOUND_TAIL))
return -1;
continue;
}
next_folio_vaddr = vaddr + (1UL << (cur_order + pshift()));
if (next_folio_vaddr >= vaddr_start + len)
break;
Would we skip order 1 folio at the last position?
For example, vaddr_start is 0x2000, len is 0x2000 and the folio at vaddr_start is an order 1 folio, whose size is exactly 0x2000.
Then we will get next_folio_vaddr == vaddr_start + len.
Could that happen?
No. After the loop, there is code checking cur_order and updating orders[].
Oh, I missed this.