From: Andrew Jones ajones@ventanamicro.com
The check doesn't prove much anyway, as the reg lists could be messed up too. Just drop the check to simplify making print_reg more independent.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones ajones@ventanamicro.com Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu haibo1.xu@intel.com --- .../testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c | 15 +-------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c index 52244de20dce..335bd5eb250a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c @@ -129,16 +129,6 @@ static const char *config_name(struct vcpu_config *c) return c->name; }
-static bool has_cap(struct vcpu_config *c, long capability) -{ - struct reg_sublist *s; - - for_each_sublist(c, s) - if (s->capability == capability) - return true; - return false; -} - static bool filter_reg(__u64 reg) { /* @@ -335,10 +325,7 @@ static void print_reg(struct vcpu_config *c, __u64 id) printf("\tKVM_REG_ARM_FW_FEAT_BMAP_REG(%lld),\n", id & 0xffff); break; case KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE: - if (has_cap(c, KVM_CAP_ARM_SVE)) - printf("\t%s,\n", sve_id_to_str(c, id)); - else - TEST_FAIL("%s: KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE is an unexpected coproc type in reg id: 0x%llx", config_name(c), id); + printf("\t%s,\n", sve_id_to_str(c, id)); break; default: TEST_FAIL("%s: Unexpected coproc type: 0x%llx in reg id: 0x%llx",