Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/cgroup: memory controller self-tests

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 01:33:26PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:

Yeah. I see that. You have a switch for the KSFT_ values. Since there is no dependency on the cgroup tree, I would recommend having this patch go through kselftest tree which is the normal process for tests anyway.

This version is good and I can apply this to linux-kselftest next. I ran a quick test and the Skip case looks good.

TAP version 13 selftests: cgroup: test_memcontrol ======================================== 1..0 # Skipped: memory controller isn't available not ok 1..1 selftests: cgroup: test_memcontrol [SKIP]

Tejun! Please send me your Ack.

Sure, please feel free to add my ack. I'll revert the original patch from cgroup tree.

Thanks.