On 12. 07. 24 10:21, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 18:19:25 +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 06:08:38PM +0200, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
On 11. 07. 24 16:33, Mark Brown wrote:
Address this by replacing our use of card numbers with card names which are more likely to be stable across runs. We use the long name since in the
I think that a combination of card number and card ID may be sufficient (and a compromise). It's shorter and user-friendly. Additionally, a table may be printed at the beginning of report with card number, card ID and long card name for further processing and identification.
These don't help, the problem is that anything which includes the card number in the test name result is going to result in unstable test names depending on race conditions at boot. There are automated systems that parse kselftest output generically, I'm not sure there's a great deal of enthusiasm for writing a custom parser for the ALSA selftests specifically.
OTOH, longname can be really ugly to read, and it can vary because it often embeds address or irq numbers in the string.
If a general name is the goal, how about using shortname instead?
Or use id field, as Jaroslav suggested, but without the card number suffix; then it's unique among multiple cards.
I prefer this (use only ID field). This string can be also set in the user space using sysfs/udev, so the administrator may change it if the default is not ideal.
Jaroslav