On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 2:26 AM Björn Töpel bjorn@kernel.org wrote:
patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org writes:
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Andrii Nakryiko andrii@kernel.org:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 15:13:52 +0200 you wrote:
From: Björn Töpel bjorn@rivosinc.com
libbpf does not include the per-arch tools include path, e.g. tools/arch/riscv/include. Some architectures depend those files to build properly.
Include tools/arch/$(SUBARCH)/include in the libbpf build.
[...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,1/2] libbpf: Add missing per-arch include path https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/710fbca820c7
- [bpf-next,2/2] selftests: bpf: Add missing per-arch include path https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/19090f0306f1
Andrii, I just noted that this landed into bpf-next, and not bpf (fixes).
Hi Bjorn,
Yes, libbpf and selftests fixes are generally applied through bpf-next, unless the issue is pretty bad and immediate.
I'm sorry, but unfortunately it's too late now to move those patches as it's now been more than a month since they landed. For the future, please let us know ASAP if you think patches were misrouted. I think we are stuck with the need to do a stable backport for these, sorry.
RISC-V libbpf/perf needs this fix in 6.12 to properly build. Would it be possible to have it in the bpf tree, and have it land in 6.12-rc7?
Andreas that has a similar fix [1].
Björn
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/mvm5xq44bqh.fsf@suse.de/