Hi Christian,
On 1/16/19 3:27 PM, Christian Brauner wrote:
This adds the promised selftest for binderfs. It will verify the following things:
- binderfs mounting works
- binder device allocation works
- performing a binder ioctl() request through a binderfs device works
- binder device removal works
- binder-control removal fails
- binderfs unmounting works
Thanks for the patch. A few comments below.
Cc: Todd Kjos tkjos@google.com Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner christian.brauner@ubuntu.com
/* Changelog */
v1:
- check for ENODEV on mount failure to detect whether binderfs is available If it is not, skip the test and exit with success.
tools/testing/selftests/Makefile | 1 + .../selftests/filesystems/binderfs/.gitignore | 1 + .../selftests/filesystems/binderfs/Makefile | 6 + .../filesystems/binderfs/binderfs_test.c | 126 ++++++++++++++++++ .../selftests/filesystems/binderfs/config | 3 + 5 files changed, 137 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/binderfs/.gitignore create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/binderfs/Makefile create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/binderfs/binderfs_test.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/binderfs/config
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile index 1a2bd15c5b6e..400ee81a3043 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ TARGETS += drivers/dma-buf TARGETS += efivarfs TARGETS += exec TARGETS += filesystems +TARGETS += filesystems/binderfs TARGETS += firmware TARGETS += ftrace TARGETS += futex diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/binderfs/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/binderfs/.gitignore new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..8a5d9bf63dd4 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/binderfs/.gitignore @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +binderfs_test diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/binderfs/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/binderfs/Makefile new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..58cb659b56b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/binderfs/Makefile @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+CFLAGS += -I../../../../../usr/include/ +TEST_GEN_PROGS := binderfs_test
+include ../../lib.mk diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/binderfs/binderfs_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/binderfs/binderfs_test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..34361efcb9c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/binderfs/binderfs_test.c @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#define _GNU_SOURCE +#include <errno.h> +#include <fcntl.h> +#include <sched.h> +#include <stdio.h> +#include <stdlib.h> +#include <string.h> +#include <sys/ioctl.h> +#include <sys/mount.h> +#include <sys/stat.h> +#include <sys/types.h> +#include <unistd.h> +#include <linux/android/binder.h> +#include <linux/android/binderfs.h> +#include "../../kselftest.h"
+int main(int argc, char *argv[]) +{
- int fd, ret, saved_errno;
- size_t len;
- struct binderfs_device device = { 0 };
- struct binder_version version = { 0 };
- ret = unshare(CLONE_NEWNS);
- if (ret < 0)
ksft_exit_fail_msg("%s - Failed to unshare mount namespace\n",
strerror(errno));
- ret = mount(NULL, "/", NULL, MS_REC | MS_PRIVATE, 0);
- if (ret < 0)
ksft_exit_fail_msg("%s - Failed to mount / as private\n",
strerror(errno));
If this test requires user to be root, please add check for root uid and do a skip the test with kselftest skip code.
- ret = mkdir("/dev/binderfs", 0755);
- if (ret < 0 && errno != EEXIST)
ksft_exit_fail_msg(
"%s - Failed to create binderfs mountpoint\n",
strerror(errno));
- ret = mount(NULL, "/dev/binderfs", "binder", 0, 0);
- if (ret < 0) {
if (errno != ENODEV)
ksft_exit_fail_msg("%s - Failed to mount binderfs\n",
strerror(errno));
ksft_test_result_skip(
"The Android binderfs filesystem is not available\n")
Use ksft_exit_skip() instead of ksft_test_result_skip()
ksft_exit_pass();
ksft_exit_pass() would result in false pass cases. Skip is the correct exit code.
Think about other exit paths to see if skip is more appropriate.
thanks, -- Shuah