On 10/26/24 13:16, Shivam Chaudhary wrote:
Add kselftest support for open, linkat, unshare, mount tests
Replace direct error handling with `ksft_test_result_*` macros for better reporting of test outcomes.
Add `ksft_print_header()` and `ksft_set_plan()` to structure test outputs more effectively.
Introduce the helper function `is_unshare()` to handle unshare() related checks.
Improve the test flow by adding more detailed pass/fail reporting for unshare, mounting, file opening, and linking operations.
Skip the test if it's not run as root, providing an appropriate Warning.
Test logs:
Before change:
Without root error: unshare, errno 1
With root No, output
After change:
Without root TAP version 13 1..1 ok 1 # SKIP This test needs root to run
With root TAP version 13 1..1 ok 1 unshare(): we have a new mount namespace. 1..2 ok 2 mount(): Root filesystem private mount: Success 1..3 ok 3 mount(): Mounting tmpfs on /tmp: Success 1..4 ok 4 openat(): Open first temporary file: Success 1..5 ok 5 linkat(): Linking the temporary file: Success 1..6 ok 6 openat(): Opening the second temporary file: Success # Totals: pass:6 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
Signed-off-by: Shivam Chaudhary cvam0000@gmail.com
Notes: Changes in v2: - Make the commit message more clear. link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241024200228.1075840-1-cvam0000@gmail.com/T/#u
.../selftests/tmpfs/bug-link-o-tmpfile.c | 72 +++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/tmpfs/bug-link-o-tmpfile.c b/tools/testing/selftests/tmpfs/bug-link-o-tmpfile.c index b5c3ddb90942..26dea19c1614 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/tmpfs/bug-link-o-tmpfile.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/tmpfs/bug-link-o-tmpfile.c @@ -23,45 +23,89 @@ #include <sys/mount.h> #include <unistd.h> -int main(void) -{
- int fd;
+#include "../kselftest.h"
- if (unshare(CLONE_NEWNS) == -1) {
+static int is_unshare(int flag)
Why do you need a new routine for this? Looks at other tests that do root check. You can use getuid in the main*( before trying unshare.
+{
- if (unshare(flag) == -1) { if (errno == ENOSYS || errno == EPERM) {
fprintf(stderr, "error: unshare, errno %d\n", errno);
return 4;
ksft_test_result_fail("error: unshare, errno %d\n", errno);
return -1; // Return -1 for failure
Match the comment style in the file which /*
} fprintf(stderr, "error: unshare, errno %d\n", errno);
return -1;
- }
- return 0; // Return 0 for success
Same comment here.
+}
+int main(void) +{
- int fd;
- // Setting up kselftest framework
- ksft_print_header();
- ksft_set_plan(1);
- // Check if test is run as root
- if (geteuid()) {
return 1; }ksft_test_result_skip("This test needs root to run!\n");
- if (mount(NULL, "/", NULL, MS_PRIVATE|MS_REC, NULL) == -1) {
fprintf(stderr, "error: mount '/', errno %d\n", errno);
- if (is_unshare(CLONE_NEWNS) == 0) {
ksft_test_result_pass("unshare(): we have a new mount namespace.\n");
- } else {
return 1; }ksft_test_result_fail("unshare(): failed\n");
- ksft_set_plan(2);
Move set_plan up to the top
- if (mount(NULL, "/", NULL, MS_PRIVATE | MS_REC, NULL) == -1) {
ksft_test_result_fail("mount(): Root filesystem private mount: Fail %d\n", errno);
return 1;
- } else {
ksft_test_result_pass("mount(): Root filesystem private mount: Success\n");
- }
- ksft_set_plan(3);
Hmm. Why add another set_plan - one plan for all tests is sufficient.
/* Our heroes: 1 root inode, 1 O_TMPFILE inode, 1 permanent inode. */ if (mount(NULL, "/tmp", "tmpfs", 0, "nr_inodes=3") == -1) {
fprintf(stderr, "error: mount tmpfs, errno %d\n", errno);
return 1;ksft_test_result_fail("mount(): Mounting tmpfs on /tmp: Fail %d\n", errno);
- } else {
}ksft_test_result_pass("mount(): Mounting tmpfs on /tmp: Success\n");
- fd = openat(AT_FDCWD, "/tmp", O_WRONLY|O_TMPFILE, 0600);
- ksft_set_plan(4);
Too many set_plans - check the usage in other tests.
- fd = openat(AT_FDCWD, "/tmp", O_WRONLY | O_TMPFILE, 0600); if (fd == -1) {
fprintf(stderr, "error: open 1, errno %d\n", errno);
return 1;ksft_test_result_fail("openat(): Open first temporary file: Fail %d\n", errno);
- } else {
}ksft_test_result_pass("openat(): Open first temporary file: Success\n");
- ksft_set_plan(5);
Again.
if (linkat(fd, "", AT_FDCWD, "/tmp/1", AT_EMPTY_PATH) == -1) {
fprintf(stderr, "error: linkat, errno %d\n", errno);
ksft_test_result_fail("linkat(): Linking the temporary file: Fail %d\n", errno);
return 1;close(fd); // Ensure fd is closed on failure
- } else {
} close(fd);ksft_test_result_pass("linkat(): Linking the temporary file: Success\n");
- fd = openat(AT_FDCWD, "/tmp", O_WRONLY|O_TMPFILE, 0600);
- ksft_set_plan(6);
- fd = openat(AT_FDCWD, "/tmp", O_WRONLY | O_TMPFILE, 0600); if (fd == -1) {
fprintf(stderr, "error: open 2, errno %d\n", errno);
return 1;ksft_test_result_fail("openat(): Opening the second temporary file: Fail %d\n", errno);
- } else {
}ksft_test_result_pass("openat(): Opening the second temporary file: Success\n");
- ksft_exit_pass(); return 0; }
This is a small test and there is no need to add these may set_plan() calls.
thanks, -- Shuah