On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 10:33 PM Tamir Duberstein tamird@gmail.com wrote:
This title is consistent with all other macros' documentation, regardless of the number of examples contained in their "Examples" sections.
Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein tamird@gmail.com
I was going to say that I could take this one independently, but we already had #1 of:
https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20240906164448.2268368-1-paddymills@p...
I will take that one (which given the `checkpatch.pl` one got stalled, I should have taken it separately as I mentioned at some point).
Patrick/Hridesh: there are new cases arriving (i.e. singular section names), so it would be great if the `checkpatch.pl` patch discussion could be restarted to see if we can land it, i.e. there is now even more justification behind it just after some months. Thanks!
Cheers, Miguel