On 6/9/20 11:55 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
Hi Shuah,
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 14:41:27 -0600 Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On 6/2/20 8:40 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
Convert the required tracefs interface checking code with requires: list.
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu mhiramat@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Tom Zanussi zanussi@kernel.org
Changes in v2: Fix trigger-onchange-action-hist.tc requires list.Masami,
This patch doesn't apply to linux-kselftest next
Patches 1-3 applied fine and this one failed. For now I will hold off on applying this series.
Yes, there is another patch posted by Tom with his ftrace enhancement in tracing-next. Thus I commented on 0/7 as below.
Sorry I made a note of it when I first looked at the series and missed that when I was applying patches.
Since this series depends on following 2 commits,
commit 619ee76f5c9f ("selftests/ftrace: Return unsupported if no error_log file") on Shuah's Kselftest tree commit bea24f766efc ("selftests/ftrace: Distinguish between hist and synthetic event checks") on Steven's Tracing tree
This can be applied on the tree which merged both of them.
I'm not sure how do I handle it. It is OK just modifying this for linux-kselftest, but in that case we will need another patch after merged both.
IMHO, since the kselftest must run correctly on older kernel, (and ftracetest does) Tom's kselftest patch should be merged into linux-kselftest instead of tracing tree.
Steve, what would you think?
No worries. As far as kselftest tree is concrned, I can apply these after rc1 comes out with Tom's patch.
Or I can give Ack and Steve can take these through tracing tree.
thanks, -- Shuah