[PATCH v5 03/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Remove print_reg's dependency on vcpu_config

1 Jul 2023

From: Andrew Jones ajones@ventanamicro.com
print_reg() and its helpers only use the vcpu_config pointer for
config_name(). So just pass the config name in instead, which is used
as a prefix in asserts. print_reg() can now be compiled independently
of config_name().
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones ajones@ventanamicro.com
Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu haibo1.xu@intel.com
---
 .../selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c      | 52 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
index 915272c342f9..424285d39965 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static bool find_reg(__u64 regs[], __u64 nr_regs, __u64 reg)
 #define CORE_SPSR_XX_NR_WORDS	2
 #define CORE_FPREGS_XX_NR_WORDS	4
-static const char *core_id_to_str(struct vcpu_config *c, __u64 id)
+static const char *core_id_to_str(const char *prefix, __u64 id)
 {
    __u64 core_off = id & ~REG_MASK, idx;
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static const char *core_id_to_str(struct vcpu_config *c, __u64 id)
    case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.regs[0]) ...
         KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.regs[30]):
    	idx = (core_off - KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.regs[0])) / CORE_REGS_XX_NR_WORDS;
-		TEST_ASSERT(idx < 31, "%s: Unexpected regs.regs index: %lld", config_name(c), idx);
+		TEST_ASSERT(idx < 31, "%s: Unexpected regs.regs index: %lld", prefix, idx);
    	return strdup_printf("KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.regs[%lld])", idx);
    case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.sp):
    	return "KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.sp)";
@@ -154,12 +154,12 @@ static const char *core_id_to_str(struct vcpu_config *c, __u64 id)
    case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(spsr[0]) ...
         KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(spsr[KVM_NR_SPSR - 1]):
    	idx = (core_off - KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(spsr[0])) / CORE_SPSR_XX_NR_WORDS;
-		TEST_ASSERT(idx < KVM_NR_SPSR, "%s: Unexpected spsr index: %lld", config_name(c), idx);
+		TEST_ASSERT(idx < KVM_NR_SPSR, "%s: Unexpected spsr index: %lld", prefix, idx);
    	return strdup_printf("KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(spsr[%lld])", idx);
    case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs[0]) ...
         KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs[31]):
    	idx = (core_off - KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs[0])) / CORE_FPREGS_XX_NR_WORDS;
-		TEST_ASSERT(idx < 32, "%s: Unexpected fp_regs.vregs index: %lld", config_name(c), idx);
+		TEST_ASSERT(idx < 32, "%s: Unexpected fp_regs.vregs index: %lld", prefix, idx);
    	return strdup_printf("KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs[%lld])", idx);
    case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.fpsr):
    	return "KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.fpsr)";
@@ -167,11 +167,11 @@ static const char *core_id_to_str(struct vcpu_config *c, __u64 id)
    	return "KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.fpcr)";
    }
-	TEST_FAIL("%s: Unknown core reg id: 0x%llx", config_name(c), id);
+	TEST_FAIL("%s: Unknown core reg id: 0x%llx", prefix, id);
    return NULL;
 }
-static const char *sve_id_to_str(struct vcpu_config *c, __u64 id)
+static const char *sve_id_to_str(const char *prefix, __u64 id)
 {
    __u64 sve_off, n, i;
@@ -181,37 +181,37 @@ static const char *sve_id_to_str(struct vcpu_config *c, __u64 id)
    sve_off = id & ~(REG_MASK | ((1ULL << 5) - 1));
    i = id & (KVM_ARM64_SVE_MAX_SLICES - 1);
-	TEST_ASSERT(i == 0, "%s: Currently we don't expect slice > 0, reg id 0x%llx", config_name(c), id);
+	TEST_ASSERT(i == 0, "%s: Currently we don't expect slice > 0, reg id 0x%llx", prefix, id);
switch (sve_off) {
    case KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_ZREG_BASE ...
         KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_ZREG_BASE + (1ULL << 5) * KVM_ARM64_SVE_NUM_ZREGS - 1:
    	n = (id >> 5) & (KVM_ARM64_SVE_NUM_ZREGS - 1);
    	TEST_ASSERT(id == KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_ZREG(n, 0),
-			    "%s: Unexpected bits set in SVE ZREG id: 0x%llx", config_name(c), id);
+			    "%s: Unexpected bits set in SVE ZREG id: 0x%llx", prefix, id);
    	return strdup_printf("KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_ZREG(%lld, 0)", n);
    case KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_PREG_BASE ...
         KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_PREG_BASE + (1ULL << 5) * KVM_ARM64_SVE_NUM_PREGS - 1:
    	n = (id >> 5) & (KVM_ARM64_SVE_NUM_PREGS - 1);
    	TEST_ASSERT(id == KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_PREG(n, 0),
-			    "%s: Unexpected bits set in SVE PREG id: 0x%llx", config_name(c), id);
+			    "%s: Unexpected bits set in SVE PREG id: 0x%llx", prefix, id);
    	return strdup_printf("KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_PREG(%lld, 0)", n);
    case KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_FFR_BASE:
    	TEST_ASSERT(id == KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_FFR(0),
-			    "%s: Unexpected bits set in SVE FFR id: 0x%llx", config_name(c), id);
+			    "%s: Unexpected bits set in SVE FFR id: 0x%llx", prefix, id);
    	return "KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_FFR(0)";
    }
return NULL;
 }
-static void print_reg(struct vcpu_config *c, __u64 id)
+static void print_reg(const char *prefix, __u64 id)
 {
    unsigned op0, op1, crn, crm, op2;
    const char *reg_size = NULL;
TEST_ASSERT((id & KVM_REG_ARCH_MASK) == KVM_REG_ARM64,
-		    "%s: KVM_REG_ARM64 missing in reg id: 0x%llx", config_name(c), id);
+		    "%s: KVM_REG_ARM64 missing in reg id: 0x%llx", prefix, id);
switch (id & KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK) {
    case KVM_REG_SIZE_U8:
@@ -243,16 +243,16 @@ static void print_reg(struct vcpu_config *c, __u64 id)
    	break;
    default:
    	TEST_FAIL("%s: Unexpected reg size: 0x%llx in reg id: 0x%llx",
-			  config_name(c), (id & KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK) >> KVM_REG_SIZE_SHIFT, id);
+			  prefix, (id & KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK) >> KVM_REG_SIZE_SHIFT, id);
    }
switch (id & KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_MASK) {
    case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE:
-		printf("\tKVM_REG_ARM64 | %s | KVM_REG_ARM_CORE | %s,\n", reg_size, core_id_to_str(c, id));
+		printf("\tKVM_REG_ARM64 | %s | KVM_REG_ARM_CORE | %s,\n", reg_size, core_id_to_str(prefix, id));
    	break;
    case KVM_REG_ARM_DEMUX:
    	TEST_ASSERT(!(id & ~(REG_MASK | KVM_REG_ARM_DEMUX_ID_MASK | KVM_REG_ARM_DEMUX_VAL_MASK)),
-			    "%s: Unexpected bits set in DEMUX reg id: 0x%llx", config_name(c), id);
+			    "%s: Unexpected bits set in DEMUX reg id: 0x%llx", prefix, id);
    	printf("\tKVM_REG_ARM64 | %s | KVM_REG_ARM_DEMUX | KVM_REG_ARM_DEMUX_ID_CCSIDR | %lld,\n",
    	       reg_size, id & KVM_REG_ARM_DEMUX_VAL_MASK);
    	break;
@@ -263,25 +263,25 @@ static void print_reg(struct vcpu_config *c, __u64 id)
    	crm = (id & KVM_REG_ARM64_SYSREG_CRM_MASK) >> KVM_REG_ARM64_SYSREG_CRM_SHIFT;
    	op2 = (id & KVM_REG_ARM64_SYSREG_OP2_MASK) >> KVM_REG_ARM64_SYSREG_OP2_SHIFT;
    	TEST_ASSERT(id == ARM64_SYS_REG(op0, op1, crn, crm, op2),
-			    "%s: Unexpected bits set in SYSREG reg id: 0x%llx", config_name(c), id);
+			    "%s: Unexpected bits set in SYSREG reg id: 0x%llx", prefix, id);
    	printf("\tARM64_SYS_REG(%d, %d, %d, %d, %d),\n", op0, op1, crn, crm, op2);
    	break;
    case KVM_REG_ARM_FW:
    	TEST_ASSERT(id == KVM_REG_ARM_FW_REG(id & 0xffff),
-			    "%s: Unexpected bits set in FW reg id: 0x%llx", config_name(c), id);
+			    "%s: Unexpected bits set in FW reg id: 0x%llx", prefix, id);
    	printf("\tKVM_REG_ARM_FW_REG(%lld),\n", id & 0xffff);
    	break;
    case KVM_REG_ARM_FW_FEAT_BMAP:
    	TEST_ASSERT(id == KVM_REG_ARM_FW_FEAT_BMAP_REG(id & 0xffff),
-			    "%s: Unexpected bits set in the bitmap feature FW reg id: 0x%llx", config_name(c), id);
+			    "%s: Unexpected bits set in the bitmap feature FW reg id: 0x%llx", prefix, id);
    	printf("\tKVM_REG_ARM_FW_FEAT_BMAP_REG(%lld),\n", id & 0xffff);
    	break;
    case KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE:
-		printf("\t%s,\n", sve_id_to_str(c, id));
+		printf("\t%s,\n", sve_id_to_str(prefix, id));
    	break;
    default:
    	TEST_FAIL("%s: Unexpected coproc type: 0x%llx in reg id: 0x%llx",
-			  config_name(c), (id & KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_MASK) >> KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_SHIFT, id);
+			  prefix, (id & KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_MASK) >> KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_SHIFT, id);
    }
 }
@@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_config *c)
    		__u64 id = reg_list->reg[i];
    		if ((print_list && !filter_reg(id)) ||
    		    (print_filtered && filter_reg(id)))
-				print_reg(c, id);
+				print_reg(config_name(c), id);
    	}
    	putchar('\n');
    	return;
@@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_config *c)
    	ret = __vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, reg_list->reg[i], &addr);
    	if (ret) {
    		printf("%s: Failed to get ", config_name(c));
-			print_reg(c, reg.id);
+			print_reg(config_name(c), reg.id);
    		putchar('\n');
    		++failed_get;
    	}
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_config *c)
    			ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, &reg);
    			if (ret != -1 || errno != EPERM) {
    				printf("%s: Failed to reject (ret=%d, errno=%d) ", config_name(c), ret, errno);
-					print_reg(c, reg.id);
+					print_reg(config_name(c), reg.id);
    				putchar('\n');
    				++failed_reject;
    			}
@@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_config *c)
    		ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, &reg);
    		if (ret) {
    			printf("%s: Failed to set ", config_name(c));
-				print_reg(c, reg.id);
+				print_reg(config_name(c), reg.id);
    			putchar('\n');
    			++failed_set;
    		}
@@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_config *c)
    	       "Consider adding them to the blessed reg "
    	       "list with the following lines:\n\n", config_name(c), new_regs);
    	for_each_new_reg(i)
-			print_reg(c, reg_list->reg[i]);
+			print_reg(config_name(c), reg_list->reg[i]);
    	putchar('\n');
    }
@@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_config *c)
    	printf("\n%s: There are %d missing registers.\n"
    	       "The following lines are missing registers:\n\n", config_name(c), missing_regs);
    	for_each_missing_reg(i)
-			print_reg(c, blessed_reg[i]);
+			print_reg(config_name(c), blessed_reg[i]);
    	putchar('\n');
    }
-- 
2.34.1


    

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

[PATCH v5 03/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Remove print_reg's dependency on vcpu_config