The test supports arm64 as well so the comment is incorrect. And there's a check for arm64 in va_high_addr_switch.c.
CC: Luiz Capitulino luizcap@redhat.com Fixes: 983e760bcdb6 ("selftest/mm: va_high_addr_switch: add ppc64 support check") Fixes: f556acc2facd ("selftests/mm: skip test for non-LPA2 and non-LVA systems") Signed-off-by: Chunyu Hu chuhu@redhat.com --- tools/testing/selftests/mm/va_high_addr_switch.sh | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/va_high_addr_switch.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/va_high_addr_switch.sh index a0c93d348b11..9492c2d72634 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/va_high_addr_switch.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/va_high_addr_switch.sh @@ -61,9 +61,9 @@ check_supported_ppc64()
check_test_requirements() { - # The test supports x86_64 and powerpc64. We currently have no useful - # eligibility check for powerpc64, and the test itself will reject other - # architectures. + # The test supports x86_64, powerpc64 and arm64. There's check for arm64 + # in va_high_addr_switch.c. The test itself will reject other architectures. + case `uname -m` in "x86_64") check_supported_x86_64