Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote:
The new helpers bpf_tcp_raw_{gen,check}_syncookie allow an XDP program to generate SYN cookies in response to TCP SYN packets and to check those cookies upon receiving the first ACK packet (the final packet of the TCP handshake).
Unlike bpf_tcp_{gen,check}_syncookie these new helpers don't need a listening socket on the local machine, which allows to use them together with synproxy to accelerate SYN cookie generation.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy maximmi@nvidia.com Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan tariqt@nvidia.com
[...]
+BPF_CALL_4(bpf_tcp_raw_check_syncookie, void *, iph, u32, iph_len,
struct tcphdr *, th, u32, th_len)+{ +#ifdef CONFIG_SYN_COOKIES
- u32 cookie;
- int ret;
- if (unlikely(th_len < sizeof(*th)))
return -EINVAL;- if (!th->ack || th->rst || th->syn)
return -EINVAL;- if (unlikely(iph_len < sizeof(struct iphdr)))
return -EINVAL;- cookie = ntohl(th->ack_seq) - 1;
- /* Both struct iphdr and struct ipv6hdr have the version field at the
* same offset so we can cast to the shorter header (struct iphdr).*/- switch (((struct iphdr *)iph)->version) {
- case 4:
Did you consider just exposing __cookie_v4_check() and __cookie_v6_check()? My code at least has already run the code above before it would ever call this helper so all the other bits are duplicate. The only reason to build it this way, as I see it, is either code can call it blindly without doing 4/v6 switch. or to make it look and feel like 'tc' world, but its already dropped the ok so its a bit different already and ifdef TC/XDP could hanlde the different parts.
ret = __cookie_v4_check((struct iphdr *)iph, th, cookie);break;+#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_IPV6)
- case 6:
if (unlikely(iph_len < sizeof(struct ipv6hdr)))return -EINVAL;ret = __cookie_v6_check((struct ipv6hdr *)iph, th, cookie);break;+#endif /* CONFIG_IPV6 */
- default:
return -EPROTONOSUPPORT;- }
- if (ret > 0)
return 0;- return -EACCES;
+#else
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+#endif +}