The kunit_mark_skipped() macro marks the current test as "skipped", with the provided reason. The kunit_skip() macro will mark the test as skipped, and abort the test.
The TAP specification supports this "SKIP directive" as a comment after the "ok" / "not ok" for a test. See the "Directives" section of the TAP spec for details: https://testanything.org/tap-specification.html#directives
The 'success' field for KUnit tests is replaced with a kunit_status enum, which can be SUCCESS, FAILURE, or SKIPPED, combined with a 'status_comment' containing information on why a test was skipped.
A new 'kunit_status' test suite is added to test this.
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com --- This change depends on the assertion typechecking fix here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210513193204.816681-1-davidgow@goo... Only the first two patches in the series are required.
This is the long-awaited follow-up to the skip tests RFC: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20200513042956.109987-1-davidgow@goo...
There are quite a few changes since that version, principally: - A kunit_status enum is now used, with SKIPPED a distinct state - The kunit_mark_skipped() and kunit_skip() macros now take printf-style format strings. - There is now a kunit_status test suite providing basic tests of this functionality. - The kunit_tool changes have been split into a separate commit. - The example skipped tests have been expanded an moved to their own suite, which is not enabled by KUNIT_ALL_TESTS. - A number of other fixes and changes here and there.
Cheers, -- David
include/kunit/test.h | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- lib/kunit/kunit-test.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++- lib/kunit/test.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++------------- 3 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index b68c61348121..40b536da027e 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -105,6 +105,18 @@ struct kunit; #define KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT " " #define KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT " "
+/** + * enum kunit_status - Type of result for a test or test suite + * @KUNIT_SUCCESS: Denotes the test suite has not failed nor been skipped + * @KUNIT_FAILURE: Denotes the test has failed. + * @KUNIT_SKIPPED: Denotes the test has been skipped. + */ +enum kunit_status { + KUNIT_SUCCESS, + KUNIT_FAILURE, + KUNIT_SKIPPED, +}; + /** * struct kunit_case - represents an individual test case. * @@ -148,13 +160,20 @@ struct kunit_case { const void* (*generate_params)(const void *prev, char *desc);
/* private: internal use only. */ - bool success; + enum kunit_status status; char *log; };
-static inline char *kunit_status_to_string(bool status) +static inline char *kunit_status_to_string(enum kunit_status status) { - return status ? "ok" : "not ok"; + switch (status) { + case KUNIT_SKIPPED: + case KUNIT_SUCCESS: + return "ok"; + case KUNIT_FAILURE: + return "not ok"; + } + return "invalid"; }
/** @@ -212,6 +231,7 @@ struct kunit_suite { struct kunit_case *test_cases;
/* private: internal use only */ + char status_comment[256]; struct dentry *debugfs; char *log; }; @@ -245,19 +265,21 @@ struct kunit { * be read after the test case finishes once all threads associated * with the test case have terminated. */ - bool success; /* Read only after test_case finishes! */ spinlock_t lock; /* Guards all mutable test state. */ + enum kunit_status status; /* Read only after test_case finishes! */ /* * Because resources is a list that may be updated multiple times (with * new resources) from any thread associated with a test case, we must * protect it with some type of lock. */ struct list_head resources; /* Protected by lock. */ + + char status_comment[256]; };
static inline void kunit_set_failure(struct kunit *test) { - WRITE_ONCE(test->success, false); + WRITE_ONCE(test->status, KUNIT_FAILURE); }
void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name, char *log); @@ -348,7 +370,7 @@ static inline int kunit_run_all_tests(void) #define kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) \ for (test_case = suite->test_cases; test_case->run_case; test_case++)
-bool kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite); +enum kunit_status kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite);
/* * Like kunit_alloc_resource() below, but returns the struct kunit_resource @@ -612,6 +634,40 @@ void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test);
void kunit_log_append(char *log, const char *fmt, ...);
+/** + * kunit_mark_skipped() - Marks @test_or_suite as skipped + * + * @test_or_suite: The test context object. + * @fmt: A printk() style format string. + * + * Marks the test as skipped. @fmt is given output as the test status + * comment, typically the reason the test was skipped. + * + * Test execution continues after kunit_mark_skipped() is called. + */ +#define kunit_mark_skipped(test_or_suite, fmt, ...) \ + do { \ + WRITE_ONCE((test_or_suite)->status, KUNIT_SKIPPED); \ + scnprintf((test_or_suite)->status_comment, 256, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ + } while (0) + +/** + * kunit_skip() - Marks @test_or_suite as skipped + * + * @test_or_suite: The test context object. + * @fmt: A printk() style format string. + * + * Skips the test. @fmt is given output as the test status + * comment, typically the reason the test was skipped. + * + * Test execution is halted after kunit_skip() is called. + */ +#define kunit_skip(test_or_suite, fmt, ...) \ + do { \ + kunit_mark_skipped((test_or_suite), fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);\ + kunit_try_catch_throw(&((test_or_suite)->try_catch)); \ + } while (0) + /* * printk and log to per-test or per-suite log buffer. Logging only done * if CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS is 'y'; if it is 'n', no log is allocated/used. diff --git a/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c b/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c index 69f902440a0e..d69efcbed624 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c @@ -437,7 +437,47 @@ static void kunit_log_test(struct kunit *test) #endif }
+static void kunit_status_set_failure_test(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct kunit fake; + + kunit_init_test(&fake, "fake test", NULL); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake.status, (enum kunit_status)KUNIT_SUCCESS); + kunit_set_failure(&fake); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake.status, (enum kunit_status)KUNIT_FAILURE); +} + +static void kunit_status_mark_skipped_test(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct kunit fake; + + kunit_init_test(&fake, "fake test", NULL); + + /* Before: Should be SUCCESS with no comment. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake.status, KUNIT_SUCCESS); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, fake.status_comment, ""); + + /* Mark the test as skipped. */ + kunit_mark_skipped(&fake, "Accepts format string: %s", "YES"); + + /* After: Should be SKIPPED with our comment. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake.status, (enum kunit_status)KUNIT_SKIPPED); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, fake.status_comment, "Accepts format string: YES"); +} + +static struct kunit_case kunit_status_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(kunit_status_set_failure_test), + KUNIT_CASE(kunit_status_mark_skipped_test), + {} +}; + +static struct kunit_suite kunit_status_test_suite = { + .name = "kunit_status", + .test_cases = kunit_status_test_cases, +}; + kunit_test_suites(&kunit_try_catch_test_suite, &kunit_resource_test_suite, - &kunit_log_test_suite); + &kunit_log_test_suite, &kunit_status_test_suite);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c index 2f6cc0123232..0ee07705d2b0 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c @@ -98,12 +98,14 @@ static void kunit_print_subtest_start(struct kunit_suite *suite)
static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(void *test_or_suite, bool is_test, - bool is_ok, + enum kunit_status status, size_t test_number, - const char *description) + const char *description, + const char *directive) { struct kunit_suite *suite = is_test ? NULL : test_or_suite; struct kunit *test = is_test ? test_or_suite : NULL; + const char *directive_header = (status == KUNIT_SKIPPED) ? " # SKIP " : "";
/* * We do not log the test suite results as doing so would @@ -114,25 +116,31 @@ static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(void *test_or_suite, * representation. */ if (suite) - pr_info("%s %zd - %s\n", - kunit_status_to_string(is_ok), - test_number, description); + pr_info("%s %zd - %s%s%s\n", + kunit_status_to_string(status), + test_number, description, + directive_header, directive ? directive : ""); else - kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "%s %zd - %s", - kunit_status_to_string(is_ok), - test_number, description); + kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test, + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "%s %zd - %s%s%s", + kunit_status_to_string(status), + test_number, description, + directive_header, directive ? directive : ""); }
-bool kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite) +enum kunit_status kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite) { const struct kunit_case *test_case; + enum kunit_status status = KUNIT_SKIPPED;
kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) { - if (!test_case->success) - return false; + if (test_case->status == KUNIT_FAILURE) + return KUNIT_FAILURE; + else if (test_case->status == KUNIT_SUCCESS) + status = KUNIT_SUCCESS; }
- return true; + return status; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_suite_has_succeeded);
@@ -143,7 +151,8 @@ static void kunit_print_subtest_end(struct kunit_suite *suite) kunit_print_ok_not_ok((void *)suite, false, kunit_suite_has_succeeded(suite), kunit_suite_counter++, - suite->name); + suite->name, + suite->status_comment); }
unsigned int kunit_test_case_num(struct kunit_suite *suite, @@ -252,7 +261,8 @@ void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name, char *log) test->log = log; if (test->log) test->log[0] = '\0'; - test->success = true; + test->status = KUNIT_SUCCESS; + test->status_comment[0] = '\0'; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_init_test);
@@ -376,7 +386,8 @@ static void kunit_run_case_catch_errors(struct kunit_suite *suite, context.test_case = test_case; kunit_try_catch_run(try_catch, &context);
- test_case->success = test->success; + test_case->status = test->status; + }
int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) @@ -388,7 +399,6 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) { struct kunit test = { .param_value = NULL, .param_index = 0 }; - bool test_success = true;
if (test_case->generate_params) { /* Get initial param. */ @@ -398,7 +408,6 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
do { kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, &test); - test_success &= test_case->success;
if (test_case->generate_params) { if (param_desc[0] == '\0') { @@ -410,7 +419,7 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "# %s: %s %d - %s", test_case->name, - kunit_status_to_string(test.success), + kunit_status_to_string(test.status), test.param_index + 1, param_desc);
/* Get next param. */ @@ -420,9 +429,10 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) } } while (test.param_value);
- kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, true, test_success, + kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, true, test_case->status, kunit_test_case_num(suite, test_case), - test_case->name); + test_case->name, + test.status_comment); }
kunit_print_subtest_end(suite); @@ -434,6 +444,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_run_tests); static void kunit_init_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite) { kunit_debugfs_create_suite(suite); + suite->status_comment[0] = '\0'; }
int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite * const * const suites)