On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 03:07:24AM -0800, Breno Leitao wrote:
Hello Bagas,
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 08:50:22AM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 03:05:59AM -0800, Breno Leitao wrote:
+.. note::
- If the user has set a conflicting `cpu` key in the userdata dictionary,
- both keys will be reported, with the kernel-populated entry appearing after
- the user one. For example::
In that case, shouldn't the kernel autopopulates numbers of the rest of CPUs?
Do you mean listing all the CPUs that are *not* sending the current message?
Nope.
Let me come up with an example to try to understand this better. Let's suppopse I have a machine with 64 cores, and cpu=42 is sending that current message, then I would see the following on the dictionary:
cpu=42
You are suggesting we send all the other cpus, except 42 in a "key"?
Sort of.
I mean, on the dictionary, we would see user-defined cpu number on one cpu, and kernel-generated numbers on the rest.
Thanks.