It's come up a few times that it would be useful to have --kunitconfig be repeatable [1][2].
This could be done before with a bit of shell-fu, e.g. $ find fs/ -name '.kunitconfig' -exec cat {} + | \ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=/dev/stdin or equivalently: $ cat fs/ext4/.kunitconfig fs/fat/.kunitconfig | \ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=/dev/stdin
But this can be fairly clunky to use in practice.
And having explicit support in kunit.py opens the door to having more config fragments of interest, e.g. options for PCI on UML [1], UML coverage [2], variants of tests [3]. There's another argument to be made that users can just use multiple --kconfig_add's, but this gets very clunky very fast (e.g. [2]).
Note: there's a big caveat here that some kconfig options might be incompatible. We try to give a clearish error message in the simple case where the same option appears multiple times with conflicting values, but more subtle ones (e.g. mutually exclusive options) will be potentially very confusing for the user. I don't know we can do better.
Note 2: if you want to combine a --kunitconfig with the default, you either have to do to specify the current build_dir
--kunitconfig=.kunit --kunitconfig=additional.config
or
--kunitconfig=tools/testing/kunit/configs/default.config --kunitconifg=additional.config
each of which have their downsides (former depends on --build_dir, doesn't work if you don't have a .kunitconfig yet), etc.
Example with conflicting values:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --kunitconfig=/dev/stdin <<EOF CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=n CONFIG_KUNIT=m EOF ... kunit_kernel.ConfigError: Multiple values specified for 2 options in kunitconfig: CONFIG_KUNIT=y vs from /dev/stdin CONFIG_KUNIT=m
CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y vs from /dev/stdin # CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST is not set
[1] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2022-June/357616.html [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CAFd5g45f3X3xF2vz2BkTHRqOC4uW6GZxtUU... [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CANpmjNOdSy6DuO6CYZ4UxhGxqhjzx4tn0sJ...
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov dlatypov@google.com Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com --- v1 -> v3: merge with kunitconfig refactor patch, rename differing_options() to conflicting_options()
v3 -> v4: add Brendan's RB tag, rebase onto the -kselftest kunit branch. The 1/3 and 3/3 of the initial series applied cleanly, but this one didn't, so I'm sending just this one out by itself now. Specifically, there were significant merge conflicts with the --qemu_args patch. --- tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 7 ++-- tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py | 11 ++++- tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py | 38 +++++++++++------ tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++---- 4 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py index b686126afb40..e132b0654029 100755 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py @@ -293,8 +293,9 @@ def add_common_opts(parser) -> None: parser.add_argument('--kunitconfig', help='Path to Kconfig fragment that enables KUnit tests.' ' If given a directory, (e.g. lib/kunit), "/.kunitconfig" ' - 'will get automatically appended.', - metavar='PATH') + 'will get automatically appended. If repeated, the files ' + 'blindly concatenated, which might not work in all cases.', + action='append', metavar='PATHS') parser.add_argument('--kconfig_add', help='Additional Kconfig options to append to the ' '.kunitconfig, e.g. CONFIG_KASAN=y. Can be repeated.', @@ -381,7 +382,7 @@ def tree_from_args(cli_args: argparse.Namespace) -> kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree qemu_args.extend(shlex.split(arg))
return kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir, - kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig, + kunitconfig_paths=cli_args.kunitconfig, kconfig_add=cli_args.kconfig_add, arch=cli_args.arch, cross_compile=cli_args.cross_compile, diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py index 898b2a35eb29..48b5f34b2e5d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_config.py @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
from dataclasses import dataclass import re -from typing import Dict, Iterable, Set +from typing import Dict, Iterable, List, Set, Tuple
CONFIG_IS_NOT_SET_PATTERN = r'^# CONFIG_(\w+) is not set$' CONFIG_PATTERN = r'^CONFIG_(\w+)=(\S+|".*")$' @@ -60,6 +60,15 @@ class Kconfig: return False return True
+ def conflicting_options(self, other: 'Kconfig') -> List[Tuple[KconfigEntry, KconfigEntry]]: + diff = [] # type: List[Tuple[KconfigEntry, KconfigEntry]] + for name, value in self._entries.items(): + b = other._entries.get(name) + if b and value != b: + pair = (KconfigEntry(name, value), KconfigEntry(name, b)) + diff.append(pair) + return diff + def merge_in_entries(self, other: 'Kconfig') -> None: for name, value in other._entries.items(): self._entries[name] = value diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py index 94ec9f65ef19..56492090e28e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py @@ -177,6 +177,30 @@ def get_kunitconfig_path(build_dir: str) -> str: def get_old_kunitconfig_path(build_dir: str) -> str: return os.path.join(build_dir, OLD_KUNITCONFIG_PATH)
+def get_parsed_kunitconfig(build_dir: str, + kunitconfig_paths: Optional[List[str]]=None) -> kunit_config.Kconfig: + if not kunitconfig_paths: + path = get_kunitconfig_path(build_dir) + if not os.path.exists(path): + shutil.copyfile(DEFAULT_KUNITCONFIG_PATH, path) + return kunit_config.parse_file(path) + + merged = kunit_config.Kconfig() + + for path in kunitconfig_paths: + if os.path.isdir(path): + path = os.path.join(path, KUNITCONFIG_PATH) + if not os.path.exists(path): + raise ConfigError(f'Specified kunitconfig ({path}) does not exist') + + partial = kunit_config.parse_file(path) + diff = merged.conflicting_options(partial) + if diff: + diff_str = '\n\n'.join(f'{a}\n vs from {path}\n{b}' for a, b in diff) + raise ConfigError(f'Multiple values specified for {len(diff)} options in kunitconfig:\n{diff_str}') + merged.merge_in_entries(partial) + return merged + def get_outfile_path(build_dir: str) -> str: return os.path.join(build_dir, OUTFILE_PATH)
@@ -221,7 +245,7 @@ class LinuxSourceTree: def __init__( self, build_dir: str, - kunitconfig_path='', + kunitconfig_paths: Optional[List[str]]=None, kconfig_add: Optional[List[str]]=None, arch=None, cross_compile=None, @@ -238,17 +262,7 @@ class LinuxSourceTree: qemu_config_path = _default_qemu_config_path(self._arch) _, self._ops = _get_qemu_ops(qemu_config_path, extra_qemu_args, cross_compile)
- if kunitconfig_path: - if os.path.isdir(kunitconfig_path): - kunitconfig_path = os.path.join(kunitconfig_path, KUNITCONFIG_PATH) - if not os.path.exists(kunitconfig_path): - raise ConfigError(f'Specified kunitconfig ({kunitconfig_path}) does not exist') - else: - kunitconfig_path = get_kunitconfig_path(build_dir) - if not os.path.exists(kunitconfig_path): - shutil.copyfile(DEFAULT_KUNITCONFIG_PATH, kunitconfig_path) - - self._kconfig = kunit_config.parse_file(kunitconfig_path) + self._kconfig = get_parsed_kunitconfig(build_dir, kunitconfig_paths) if kconfig_add: kconfig = kunit_config.parse_from_string('\n'.join(kconfig_add)) self._kconfig.merge_in_entries(kconfig) diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py index e56544d58147..ad63d0d34f3f 100755 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py @@ -356,17 +356,46 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase):
def test_invalid_kunitconfig(self): with self.assertRaisesRegex(kunit_kernel.ConfigError, 'nonexistent.* does not exist'): - kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_path='/nonexistent_file') + kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=['/nonexistent_file'])
def test_valid_kunitconfig(self): with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile('wt') as kunitconfig: - kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_path=kunitconfig.name) + kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=[kunitconfig.name])
def test_dir_kunitconfig(self): with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory('') as dir: with open(os.path.join(dir, '.kunitconfig'), 'w'): pass - kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_path=dir) + kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=[dir]) + + def test_multiple_kunitconfig(self): + want_kconfig = kunit_config.Kconfig() + want_kconfig.add_entry('KUNIT', 'y') + want_kconfig.add_entry('KUNIT_TEST', 'm') + + with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory('') as dir: + other = os.path.join(dir, 'otherkunitconfig') + with open(os.path.join(dir, '.kunitconfig'), 'w') as f: + f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y') + with open(other, 'w') as f: + f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=m') + pass + + tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=[dir, other]) + self.assertTrue(want_kconfig.is_subset_of(tree._kconfig), msg=tree._kconfig) + + + def test_multiple_kunitconfig_invalid(self): + with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory('') as dir: + other = os.path.join(dir, 'otherkunitconfig') + with open(os.path.join(dir, '.kunitconfig'), 'w') as f: + f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y') + with open(other, 'w') as f: + f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=m') + + with self.assertRaisesRegex(kunit_kernel.ConfigError, '(?s)Multiple values.*CONFIG_KUNIT'): + kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=[dir, other]) +
def test_kconfig_add(self): want_kconfig = kunit_config.Kconfig() @@ -636,7 +665,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): kunit.main(['run', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig']) # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here. self.mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', - kunitconfig_path='mykunitconfig', + kunitconfig_paths=['mykunitconfig'], kconfig_add=None, arch='um', cross_compile=None, @@ -647,18 +676,31 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): kunit.main(['config', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig']) # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here. self.mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', - kunitconfig_path='mykunitconfig', + kunitconfig_paths=['mykunitconfig'], kconfig_add=None, arch='um', cross_compile=None, qemu_config_path=None, extra_qemu_args=[])
+ @mock.patch.object(kunit_kernel, 'LinuxSourceTree') + def test_run_multiple_kunitconfig(self, mock_linux_init): + mock_linux_init.return_value = self.linux_source_mock + kunit.main(['run', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig', '--kunitconfig=other']) + # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here. + mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', + kunitconfig_paths=['mykunitconfig', 'other'], + kconfig_add=None, + arch='um', + cross_compile=None, + qemu_config_path=None, + extra_qemu_args=[]) + def test_run_kconfig_add(self): kunit.main(['run', '--kconfig_add=CONFIG_KASAN=y', '--kconfig_add=CONFIG_KCSAN=y']) # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here. self.mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', - kunitconfig_path=None, + kunitconfig_paths=None, kconfig_add=['CONFIG_KASAN=y', 'CONFIG_KCSAN=y'], arch='um', cross_compile=None, @@ -669,7 +711,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): kunit.main(['run', '--arch=x86_64', '--qemu_args', '-m 2048']) # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here. self.mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', - kunitconfig_path=None, + kunitconfig_paths=None, kconfig_add=None, arch='x86_64', cross_compile=None,
base-commit: 1d202d1496a0be94100d8cbc2b658dcd980a3edf