On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 05:38:16PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 at 16:07, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 03:39:09PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
While building selftests the following warnings were noticed for arm architecture on Linux stable v5.15.13 kernel and also on Linus's tree.
arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc -Wall -Wl,--no-as-needed -O2 -g -I../../../../usr/include/ txtimestamp.c -o /home/tuxbuild/.cache/tuxmake/builds/current/kselftest/net/txtimestamp txtimestamp.c: In function 'validate_timestamp': txtimestamp.c:164:29: warning: format '0' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'int64_t' {aka 'long long int'} [-Wformat=] 164 | fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: 0 us expected between 0 and 0\n",
<trim>
Same question as before, is this a regression, and if so, any pointers to a fix?
This is a known warning on Linus's tree.
Great, please report the issue there, as there's nothing I can do about it in the 5.15.y tree until it is resolved there as you know.
thanks,
greg k-h