On 15/05/25 3:11 pm, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 03:05:07PM +0530, Dev Jain wrote:
On 15/05/25 2:27 pm, Mark Brown wrote:
@@ -189,7 +214,10 @@ static void do_test(int fd, size_t size, enum test_type type, bool shared) * some previously unsupported filesystems, we might want to * perform some additional tests for possible data corruptions. */
ksft_test_result(should_work, "Should have worked\n");
if (should_work)result = KSFT_PASS;Missed printing "Should have worked" here.
I didn't think that output was particularly useful separate to the overall test result (which is logged on exit from the function), it's just the test result more than diagnostic information.
No hard opinion.
Please delete unneeded context from mails when replying. Doing this makes it much easier to find your reply in the message, helping ensure it won't be missed by people scrolling through the irrelevant quoted material.
You have mentioned that before, sorry my bad! I also hate it :)