On Tue, 7 Feb 2023, Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu) wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023, Shaopeng Tan wrote:
After creating a child process with fork() in CAT test, if an error occurs or a signal such as SIGINT is received, the parent process will be terminated immediately, and therefor the child process will not be killed and also resctrlfs is not unmounted.
There is a signal handler registered in CMT/MBM/MBA tests, which kills child process, unmount resctrlfs, cleanups result files, etc., if a signal such as SIGINT is received.
Commonize the signal handler registered for CMT/MBM/MBA tests and reuse it in CAT too.
To reuse the signal handler, make the child process in CAT wait to be killed by parent process in any case (an error occurred or a signal was received), and when killing child process use global bm_pid instead of local bm_pid.
Also, since the MBA/MBA/CMT/CAT are run in order, unregister the signal handler at the end of each test so that the signal handler cannot be inherited by other tests.
Signed-off-by: Shaopeng Tan tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com
ret = cat_val(¶m);
- if (ret)
return ret;- ret = check_results(¶m);
- if (ret)
return ret;
- if (ret == 0)
ret = check_results(¶m);It would be take this program flow fix out of the signal handler change into a separate change.
Do you mean this fix should be separated into two patches?
Yes.
Currently, I see your patch doing (mainly) two things: 1) cleaning up the messy signal handler logic 2) fixing the early return in case of error from cat_val() or check_results()
Both are good changes and both are needed to fully fix things. But (IMHO) those are indepedent enough that it would warrant to split this change into two.