Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 11:59:10PM CET, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Roopa Prabhu roopa@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 1:01 PM, Jiri Pirko jiri@resnulli.us wrote:
Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 09:48:54PM CET, dsahern@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/15/18 11:18 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/forwarding/lib.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/forwarding/lib.sh index bb423371f4de..264bf0af4c4d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/forwarding/lib.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/forwarding/lib.sh @@ -22,6 +22,11 @@ if [[ ! -x "$(command -v jq)" ]]; then exit 0 fi
+if [[ ! -x "$(command -v mausezahn)" ]]; then
- echo "SKIP: mausezahn not installed"
- exit 0
+fi
The checks are good, but hitting a collision with this one: $ ./router.sh SKIP: mausezahn not installed
For debian, it is mz not mausezahn.
That is weird. If you look at the sources, the binary name is "mausezahn". Looks like debian is doing some renaming :/
I have seen/used both versions. Debian packages from some old upstream source which calls it mz. https://packages.debian.org/sid/main/mz
I have used latest mz (with ipv6 support etc) from netsniff-ng which builds it as mausezahn.
actually Debian also builds https://packages.debian.org/sid/netsniff-ng and installs 'mausezahn'
so you might have to check and use which exists... (mausezahn overriding mz).
I believe we can stick with mausezahn, since it is apparently available on Debian too.
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html