There appears to be a spelling mistake in a bpf test message. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King colin.i.king@gmail.com --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c index 4d347bc53aa2..359f3e8f8b60 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c @@ -1078,7 +1078,7 @@ .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer -= pointer prohibited", }, { - "map access: trying to leak tained dst reg", + "map access: trying to leak tainted dst reg", .insns = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master) by Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 18:24:00 +0000 you wrote:
There appears to be a spelling mistake in a bpf test message. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King colin.i.king@gmail.com
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Here is the summary with links: - [next] bpf, selftests: Fix spelling mistake "tained" -> "tainted" https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/819d11507f66
You are awesome, thank you!
linux-kselftest-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Colin Ian King -
patchwork-bot+netdevbpf＠kernel.org