Hi all,

On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 04:43:28 +0530 Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org wrote:

On Sun, Feb 9, 2025, 2:44 AM Kees Cook kees@kernel.org wrote:

...

On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 07:53:43AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:

...

On 10/11/24 01:25, David Gow wrote:

...

As discussed in [1], the KUnit test naming scheme has changed to avoid name conflicts (and tab-completion woes) with the files being tested. These renames and moves have caused a nasty set of merge conflicts, so this series collates and rebases them all to be applied via mm-nonmm-unstable alongside any lib/ changes[2].

Shall I carry this in the hardening tree? I didn't see it land in the merge window, and I still don't see it in -next?

My thinking was that this series would go through Andrew's tree to avoid conflicts. Please take it through yours.

If they have been rebased onto mm-nonmm-unstable, then they really need to go through Andrew' tree (since mm-nonmm-unstable gets rebased often).