On 04/25/2018 09:26 AM, Greg KH wrote:

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 09:39:02AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:

...

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 7:10 AM, Jeffrin Jose T ahiliation@yahoo.co.in wrote:

...

This is a patch to the tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_run_tests.sh file which fixes a bug which calls to a wrong function name,which in turn blocks the execution of certain tests.

Signed-off-by: Jeffrin Jose T jeffrin@rajagiritech.edu.in

---

tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_run_tests.sh | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_run_tests.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_run_tests.sh index 06d638e9dc62..cffdd4eb0a57 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_run_tests.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_run_tests.sh @@ -66,5 +66,5 @@ if [ -f $FW_FORCE_SYSFS_FALLBACK ]; then run_test_config_0003 else echo "Running basic kernel configuration, working with your config"

•   run_test
  

•   run_tests
  

fi

I find it confusing that run_tests() uses $1 and $2 but later ignores them unless -f $FW_FORCE_SYSFS_FALLBACK, which is checked at both the top level and in proc_set_*_fallback()... I'd expected the test to happen only in run_tests() and have it removed from from proc_set_*_fallback().

Regardless, the above patch is correct to run the tests. :)

Thanks, I'll go queue this up.

greg k-h

Thanks. This probably has dependency on firmware tree.

Acked-by: Shuah Khan (Samsung OSG) shuah@kernel.org

-- Shuah -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html