There are no maintainers specified for tools/testing/selftests/x86. Shuah has mentioned [1] that the patches should go through x86 tree or in special cases directly to Shuah's tree after getting ack-ed from x86 maintainers. Different people have been confused when sending patches as correct maintainers aren't found by get_maintainer.pl script. Fix this by adding entry to MAINTAINERS file.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/90dc0dfc-4c67-4ea1-b705-0585d6e2ec47@linuxfounda...
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum usama.anjum@collabora.com --- MAINTAINERS | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 523d84b2d6139..f3a17e5d954a3 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -24378,6 +24378,7 @@ T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git x86/core F: Documentation/arch/x86/ F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/x86/ F: arch/x86/ +F: tools/testing/selftests/x86
X86 ENTRY CODE M: Andy Lutomirski luto@kernel.org
Kind reminder
On 6/10/24 10:28 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
There are no maintainers specified for tools/testing/selftests/x86. Shuah has mentioned [1] that the patches should go through x86 tree or in special cases directly to Shuah's tree after getting ack-ed from x86 maintainers. Different people have been confused when sending patches as correct maintainers aren't found by get_maintainer.pl script. Fix this by adding entry to MAINTAINERS file.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/90dc0dfc-4c67-4ea1-b705-0585d6e2ec47@linuxfounda...
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum usama.anjum@collabora.com
MAINTAINERS | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 523d84b2d6139..f3a17e5d954a3 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -24378,6 +24378,7 @@ T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git x86/core F: Documentation/arch/x86/ F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/x86/ F: arch/x86/ +F: tools/testing/selftests/x86 X86 ENTRY CODE M: Andy Lutomirski luto@kernel.org
Kind reminder
On 7/2/24 3:17 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Kind reminder
On 6/10/24 10:28 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
There are no maintainers specified for tools/testing/selftests/x86. Shuah has mentioned [1] that the patches should go through x86 tree or in special cases directly to Shuah's tree after getting ack-ed from x86 maintainers. Different people have been confused when sending patches as correct maintainers aren't found by get_maintainer.pl script. Fix this by adding entry to MAINTAINERS file.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/90dc0dfc-4c67-4ea1-b705-0585d6e2ec47@linuxfounda...
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum usama.anjum@collabora.com
MAINTAINERS | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 523d84b2d6139..f3a17e5d954a3 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -24378,6 +24378,7 @@ T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git x86/core F: Documentation/arch/x86/ F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/x86/ F: arch/x86/ +F: tools/testing/selftests/x86 X86 ENTRY CODE M: Andy Lutomirski luto@kernel.org
On 7/31/24 07:42, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Kind reminder
On 7/2/24 3:17 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Kind reminder
Top post ???
On 6/10/24 10:28 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
There are no maintainers specified for tools/testing/selftests/x86. Shuah has mentioned [1] that the patches should go through x86 tree or in special cases directly to Shuah's tree after getting ack-ed from x86 maintainers. Different people have been confused when sending patches as correct maintainers aren't found by get_maintainer.pl script. Fix this by adding entry to MAINTAINERS file.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/90dc0dfc-4c67-4ea1-b705-0585d6e2ec47@linuxfounda...
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum usama.anjum@collabora.com
MAINTAINERS | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Applied to linux-kselftest next for Linux 6.12-rc1.
thanks, -- Shuah
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 12:14:16PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/31/24 07:42, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Kind reminder
On 7/2/24 3:17 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Kind reminder
Top post ???
On 6/10/24 10:28 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
There are no maintainers specified for tools/testing/selftests/x86. Shuah has mentioned [1] that the patches should go through x86 tree or in special cases directly to Shuah's tree after getting ack-ed from x86 maintainers. Different people have been confused when sending patches as correct maintainers aren't found by get_maintainer.pl script. Fix this by adding entry to MAINTAINERS file.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/90dc0dfc-4c67-4ea1-b705-0585d6e2ec47@linuxfounda...
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum usama.anjum@collabora.com
MAINTAINERS | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Applied to linux-kselftest next for Linux 6.12-rc1.
You are applying things for the x86 entry, without an x86 ack, srsly?
On 7/31/24 15:23, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 12:14:16PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/31/24 07:42, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Kind reminder
On 7/2/24 3:17 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Kind reminder
Top post ???
On 6/10/24 10:28 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
There are no maintainers specified for tools/testing/selftests/x86. Shuah has mentioned [1] that the patches should go through x86 tree or in special cases directly to Shuah's tree after getting ack-ed from x86 maintainers. Different people have been confused when sending patches as correct maintainers aren't found by get_maintainer.pl script. Fix this by adding entry to MAINTAINERS file.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/90dc0dfc-4c67-4ea1-b705-0585d6e2ec47@linuxfounda...
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum usama.anjum@collabora.com
MAINTAINERS | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Applied to linux-kselftest next for Linux 6.12-rc1.
You are applying things for the x86 entry, without an x86 ack, srsly?
People are having problems with s86 selftests not making it to x86 lists. I figured it will make it easier for the x86 team.
I don't have issues dropping this patch.
thanks, -- Shuah
On 8/1/24 13:27, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/31/24 15:23, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 12:14:16PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 7/31/24 07:42, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Kind reminder
On 7/2/24 3:17 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
Kind reminder
Top post ???
On 6/10/24 10:28 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
There are no maintainers specified for tools/testing/selftests/x86. Shuah has mentioned [1] that the patches should go through x86 tree or in special cases directly to Shuah's tree after getting ack-ed from x86 maintainers. Different people have been confused when sending patches as correct maintainers aren't found by get_maintainer.pl script. Fix this by adding entry to MAINTAINERS file.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/90dc0dfc-4c67-4ea1-b705-0585d6e2ec47@linuxfounda...
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum usama.anjum@collabora.com
MAINTAINERS | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Applied to linux-kselftest next for Linux 6.12-rc1.
You are applying things for the x86 entry, without an x86 ack, srsly?
People are having problems with s86 selftests not making it to x86 lists. I figured it will make it easier for the x86 team.
I don't have issues dropping this patch.
Dropped from my tree
thanks, -- Shuah
On 6/9/24 22:28, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 523d84b2d6139..f3a17e5d954a3 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -24378,6 +24378,7 @@ T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git x86/core F: Documentation/arch/x86/ F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/x86/ F: arch/x86/ +F: tools/testing/selftests/x86
I think this makes a lot of sense. We do at least need to get cc'd on this stuff.
Acked-by: Dave Hansen dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
linux-kselftest-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Dave Hansen -
Muhammad Usama Anjum -
Peter Zijlstra -
Shuah Khan