Currently running tests via KUnit tool means tweaking a .kunitconfig file, which you'd keep around locally and never commit. This changes makes it so users can pass in a path to a kunitconfig.
One of the imagined use cases is having kunitconfig fragments in-tree to formalize interesting sets of tests for features/subsystems, e.g. $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunticonfig=fs/ext4/kunitconfig
For now, this hypothetical fs/ext4/kunitconfig would contain CONFIG_KUNIT=y CONFIG_EXT4_FS=y CONFIG_EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS=y
At the moment, it's not hard to manually whip up this file, but as more and more tests get added, this will get tedious.
It also opens the door to documenting how to run all the tests relevant to a specific subsystem or feature as a simple one-liner.
This can be seen as an analogue to tools/testing/selftests/*/config But in the case of KUnit, the tests live in the same directory as the code-under-test, so it feels more natural to allow the kunitconfig fragments to live anywhere. (Though, people could create a separate directory if wanted; this patch imposes no restrictions on the path).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov dlatypov@google.com ---
Changes since v1: change from a positional arg to a flag --kunitconfig. Ensure that it gets added for `kunit.py config` and all other commands.
--- tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 9 +++++--- tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py | 12 ++++++---- tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py index e808a47c839b..02871a363f76 100755 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py @@ -182,6 +182,9 @@ def add_common_opts(parser) -> None: parser.add_argument('--alltests', help='Run all KUnit tests through allyesconfig', action='store_true') + parser.add_argument('--kunitconfig', + help='Path to Kconfig fragment that enables KUnit tests', + metavar='kunitconfig')
def add_build_opts(parser) -> None: parser.add_argument('--jobs', @@ -256,7 +259,7 @@ def main(argv, linux=None): os.mkdir(cli_args.build_dir)
if not linux: - linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir) + linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir, kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig)
request = KunitRequest(cli_args.raw_output, cli_args.timeout, @@ -274,7 +277,7 @@ def main(argv, linux=None): os.mkdir(cli_args.build_dir)
if not linux: - linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir) + linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir, kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig)
request = KunitConfigRequest(cli_args.build_dir, cli_args.make_options) @@ -286,7 +289,7 @@ def main(argv, linux=None): sys.exit(1) elif cli_args.subcommand == 'build': if not linux: - linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir) + linux = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(cli_args.build_dir, kunitconfig_path=cli_args.kunitconfig)
request = KunitBuildRequest(cli_args.jobs, cli_args.build_dir, diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py index 2076a5a2d060..0b461663e7d9 100644 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ def get_outfile_path(build_dir) -> str: class LinuxSourceTree(object): """Represents a Linux kernel source tree with KUnit tests."""
- def __init__(self, build_dir: str, load_config=True, defconfig=DEFAULT_KUNITCONFIG_PATH) -> None: + def __init__(self, build_dir: str, load_config=True, kunitconfig_path='') -> None: signal.signal(signal.SIGINT, self.signal_handler)
self._ops = LinuxSourceTreeOperations() @@ -131,9 +131,13 @@ class LinuxSourceTree(object): if not load_config: return
- kunitconfig_path = get_kunitconfig_path(build_dir) - if not os.path.exists(kunitconfig_path): - shutil.copyfile(defconfig, kunitconfig_path) + if kunitconfig_path: + if not os.path.exists(kunitconfig_path): + raise ConfigError(f'Specified kunitconfig ({kunitconfig_path}) does not exist') + else: + kunitconfig_path = get_kunitconfig_path(build_dir) + if not os.path.exists(kunitconfig_path): + shutil.copyfile(DEFAULT_KUNITCONFIG_PATH, kunitconfig_path)
self._kconfig = kunit_config.Kconfig() self._kconfig.read_from_file(kunitconfig_path) diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py index b593f4448e83..22f50b931138 100755 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ from unittest import mock import tempfile, shutil # Handling test_tmpdir
import json +import signal import os
import kunit_config @@ -250,6 +251,23 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase): result.status) self.assertEqual('kunit-resource-test', result.suites[0].name)
+class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase): + + def setUp(self): + mock.patch.object(signal, 'signal').start() + self.addCleanup(mock.patch.stopall) + + def test_invalid_kunitconfig(self): + with self.assertRaisesRegex(kunit_kernel.ConfigError, 'nonexistent.* does not exist'): + kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_path='/nonexistent_file') + + def test_valid_kunitconfig(self): + with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile('wt') as kunitconfig: + tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_path=kunitconfig.name) + + # TODO: add more test cases. + + class KUnitJsonTest(unittest.TestCase):
def _json_for(self, log_file): @@ -399,5 +417,19 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with(build_dir=build_dir, timeout=300) self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('Testing complete.'))
+ @mock.patch.object(kunit_kernel, 'LinuxSourceTree') + def test_run_kunitconfig(self, mock_linux_init): + mock_linux_init.return_value = self.linux_source_mock + kunit.main(['run', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig']) + # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here. + mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', kunitconfig_path='mykunitconfig') + + @mock.patch.object(kunit_kernel, 'LinuxSourceTree') + def test_config_kunitconfig(self, mock_linux_init): + mock_linux_init.return_value = self.linux_source_mock + kunit.main(['config', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig']) + # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here. + mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', kunitconfig_path='mykunitconfig') + if __name__ == '__main__': unittest.main()
base-commit: 88bb507a74ea7d75fa49edd421eaa710a7d80598
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 12:55 PM Daniel Latypov dlatypov@google.com wrote:
Currently running tests via KUnit tool means tweaking a .kunitconfig file, which you'd keep around locally and never commit. This changes makes it so users can pass in a path to a kunitconfig.
One of the imagined use cases is having kunitconfig fragments in-tree to formalize interesting sets of tests for features/subsystems, e.g. $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunticonfig=fs/ext4/kunitconfig
For now, this hypothetical fs/ext4/kunitconfig would contain CONFIG_KUNIT=y CONFIG_EXT4_FS=y CONFIG_EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS=y
At the moment, it's not hard to manually whip up this file, but as more and more tests get added, this will get tedious.
It also opens the door to documenting how to run all the tests relevant to a specific subsystem or feature as a simple one-liner.
This can be seen as an analogue to tools/testing/selftests/*/config But in the case of KUnit, the tests live in the same directory as the code-under-test, so it feels more natural to allow the kunitconfig fragments to live anywhere. (Though, people could create a separate directory if wanted; this patch imposes no restrictions on the path).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov dlatypov@google.com
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 12:55 PM Daniel Latypov dlatypov@google.com wrote:
Currently running tests via KUnit tool means tweaking a .kunitconfig file, which you'd keep around locally and never commit. This changes makes it so users can pass in a path to a kunitconfig.
One of the imagined use cases is having kunitconfig fragments in-tree to formalize interesting sets of tests for features/subsystems, e.g. $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunticonfig=fs/ext4/kunitconfig
For now, this hypothetical fs/ext4/kunitconfig would contain CONFIG_KUNIT=y CONFIG_EXT4_FS=y CONFIG_EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS=y
At the moment, it's not hard to manually whip up this file, but as more and more tests get added, this will get tedious.
It also opens the door to documenting how to run all the tests relevant to a specific subsystem or feature as a simple one-liner.
This can be seen as an analogue to tools/testing/selftests/*/config But in the case of KUnit, the tests live in the same directory as the code-under-test, so it feels more natural to allow the kunitconfig fragments to live anywhere. (Though, people could create a separate directory if wanted; this patch imposes no restrictions on the path).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov dlatypov@google.com
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins brendanhiggins@google.com
linux-kselftest-mirror@lists.linaro.org