When replacing KUNIT_BINARY_*_MSG_ASSERTION() macros with KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION(), the assert_type parameter was not always correctly transferred. Specifically, the following errors were introduced: - KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG() uses KUNIT_ASSERTION - KUNIT_ASSERT_LT_MSG() uses KUNIT_EXPECTATION - KUNIT_ASSERT_GT_MSG() uses KUNIT_EXPECTATION

A failing KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG() test thus prevents further tests from running, while failing KUNIT_ASSERT_{LT,GT}_MSG() tests do not prevent further tests from running. This is contrary to the documentation, which states that failing KUNIT_EXPECT_* macros allow further tests to run, while failing KUNIT_ASSERT_* macros should prevent this.

Revert the KUNIT_{ASSERTION,EXPECTATION} switches to fix the behaviour for the affected macros.

Fixes: 40f39777ce4f ("kunit: decrease macro layering for integer asserts") Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule sander@svanheule.net --- include/kunit/test.h | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index c958855681cc..840a2c375065 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ do { \

#define KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG(test, left, right, fmt, ...) \ KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION(test, \ - KUNIT_ASSERTION, \ + KUNIT_EXPECTATION, \ left, <=, right, \ fmt, \ ##__VA_ARGS__) @@ -1116,7 +1116,7 @@ do { \

#define KUNIT_ASSERT_LT_MSG(test, left, right, fmt, ...) \ KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION(test, \ - KUNIT_EXPECTATION, \ + KUNIT_ASSERTION, \ left, <, right, \ fmt, \ ##__VA_ARGS__) @@ -1157,7 +1157,7 @@ do { \

#define KUNIT_ASSERT_GT_MSG(test, left, right, fmt, ...) \ KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION(test, \ - KUNIT_EXPECTATION, \ + KUNIT_ASSERTION, \ left, >, right, \ fmt, \ ##__VA_ARGS__)