Tests for the can subsystem have been in the can-tests repository[1] so far. Start moving the tests to kernel selftests by importing the current tst-filter test. The test is now named test_raw_filter and is substantially updated to be more aligned with the kernel selftests, follow the coding style, and simplify the validation of received CAN frames. We also include documentation of the test design. The test verifies that the single filters on raw CAN sockets work as expected.
We intend to import more tests from can-tests and add additional test cases in the future. The goal of moving the CAN selftests into the tree is to align the tests more closely with the kernel, improve testing of CAN in general, and to simplify running the tests automatically in the various kernel CI systems.
[1]: https://github.com/linux-can/can-tests
Signed-off-by: Felix Maurer fmaurer@redhat.com ---
Notes: I keep netdev and its reviewers and maintainers in CC because of the changes to their paths in MAINTAINERS, even though Jakub acked them on v1. The change should be merged through linux-can-next and subsequent changes will not go to netdev anymore.
I have removed the long form of the licenses in the beginning of the file during the import, as that is covered by the SPDX line anyways. The copyright is left as it was originally.
Changes to v1: - link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/cover.1745323279.git.fmaurer@redhat.com/ - Squashed import and rewrite into a single commit - Simplified checking of the received flags - Pass the interface name through env (easier with the selftest framework than adding an argument)
I have not updated test_raw_filter.sh to work with physical CAN interfaces so far because I don't have one to test this right now and don't think it's a priority for selftests for now.
MAINTAINERS | 2 + tools/testing/selftests/Makefile | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/net/can/.gitignore | 2 + tools/testing/selftests/net/can/Makefile | 11 + .../selftests/net/can/test_raw_filter.c | 395 ++++++++++++++++++ .../selftests/net/can/test_raw_filter.sh | 37 ++ 6 files changed, 448 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/net/can/.gitignore create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/net/can/Makefile create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/net/can/test_raw_filter.c create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/net/can/test_raw_filter.sh
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 241ca9e260a2..55749b492ebb 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -5155,6 +5155,7 @@ F: include/uapi/linux/can/isotp.h F: include/uapi/linux/can/raw.h F: net/can/ F: net/sched/em_canid.c +F: tools/testing/selftests/net/can/
CAN-J1939 NETWORK LAYER M: Robin van der Gracht robin@protonic.nl @@ -16577,6 +16578,7 @@ X: net/ceph/ X: net/mac80211/ X: net/rfkill/ X: net/wireless/ +X: tools/testing/selftests/net/can/
NETWORKING [IPSEC] M: Steffen Klassert steffen.klassert@secunet.com diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile index 8daac70c2f9d..e5c9ecd52b73 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ TARGETS += mqueue TARGETS += nci TARGETS += net TARGETS += net/af_unix +TARGETS += net/can TARGETS += net/forwarding TARGETS += net/hsr TARGETS += net/mptcp diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/can/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/net/can/.gitignore new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..764a53fc837f --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/can/.gitignore @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +test_raw_filter diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/can/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/net/can/Makefile new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..5b82e60a03e7 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/can/Makefile @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +top_srcdir = ../../../../.. + +CFLAGS += -Wall -Wl,--no-as-needed -O2 -g -I$(top_srcdir)/usr/include $(KHDR_INCLUDES) + +TEST_PROGS := test_raw_filter.sh + +TEST_GEN_FILES := test_raw_filter + +include ../../lib.mk diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/can/test_raw_filter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/can/test_raw_filter.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..3c0e43cab1e8 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/can/test_raw_filter.c @@ -0,0 +1,395 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-3-Clause) +/* + * Copyright (c) 2011 Volkswagen Group Electronic Research + * All rights reserved. + */ + +#include <stdio.h> +#include <stdlib.h> +#include <unistd.h> +#include <string.h> + +#include <sys/types.h> +#include <sys/socket.h> +#include <sys/ioctl.h> +#include <sys/time.h> +#include <net/if.h> +#include <linux/if.h> + +#include <linux/can.h> +#include <linux/can/raw.h> + +#include "../../kselftest_harness.h" + +#define ID 0x123 + +char VCANIF[IFNAMSIZ]; + +static int send_can_frames(int sock, int testcase) +{ + struct can_frame frame; + + frame.can_dlc = 1; + frame.data[0] = testcase; + + frame.can_id = ID; + if (write(sock, &frame, sizeof(frame)) < 0) + goto write_err; + + frame.can_id = (ID | CAN_RTR_FLAG); + if (write(sock, &frame, sizeof(frame)) < 0) + goto write_err; + + frame.can_id = (ID | CAN_EFF_FLAG); + if (write(sock, &frame, sizeof(frame)) < 0) + goto write_err; + + frame.can_id = (ID | CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG); + if (write(sock, &frame, sizeof(frame)) < 0) + goto write_err; + + return 0; + +write_err: + perror("write"); + return 1; + +} + +FIXTURE(can_filters) { + int sock; +}; + +FIXTURE_SETUP(can_filters) +{ + struct sockaddr_can addr; + struct ifreq ifr; + int recv_own_msgs = 1; + int s, ret; + + s = socket(PF_CAN, SOCK_RAW, CAN_RAW); + ASSERT_LT(0, s) + TH_LOG("failed to create CAN_RAW socket: %d", errno); + + strncpy(ifr.ifr_name, VCANIF, sizeof(ifr.ifr_name)); + ret = ioctl(s, SIOCGIFINDEX, &ifr); + ASSERT_LE(0, ret) + TH_LOG("failed SIOCGIFINDEX: %d", errno); + + addr.can_family = AF_CAN; + addr.can_ifindex = ifr.ifr_ifindex; + + setsockopt(s, SOL_CAN_RAW, CAN_RAW_RECV_OWN_MSGS, + &recv_own_msgs, sizeof(recv_own_msgs)); + + ret = bind(s, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, sizeof(addr)); + ASSERT_EQ(0, ret) + TH_LOG("failed bind socket: %d", errno); + + self->sock = s; +} + +FIXTURE_TEARDOWN(can_filters) +{ + close(self->sock); +} + +FIXTURE_VARIANT(can_filters) { + int testcase; + canid_t id; + canid_t mask; + int exp_num_rx; + canid_t exp_flags[]; +}; +#define T_EFF (CAN_EFF_FLAG >> 28) +#define T_RTR (CAN_RTR_FLAG >> 28) + +/* Receive all frames when filtering for the ID in standard frame format */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, base) { + .testcase = 1, + .id = ID, + .mask = CAN_SFF_MASK, + .exp_num_rx = 4, + .exp_flags = { + 0, + CAN_RTR_FLAG, + CAN_EFF_FLAG, + CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG, + }, +}; +/* Ignore EFF flag in filter ID if not covered by filter mask */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, base_eff) { + .testcase = 2, + .id = ID | CAN_EFF_FLAG, + .mask = CAN_SFF_MASK, + .exp_num_rx = 4, + .exp_flags = { + 0, + CAN_RTR_FLAG, + CAN_EFF_FLAG, + CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG, + }, +}; +/* Ignore RTR flag in filter ID if not covered by filter mask */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, base_rtr) { + .testcase = 3, + .id = ID | CAN_RTR_FLAG, + .mask = CAN_SFF_MASK, + .exp_num_rx = 4, + .exp_flags = { + 0, + CAN_RTR_FLAG, + CAN_EFF_FLAG, + CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG, + }, +}; +/* Ignore EFF and RTR flags in filter ID if not covered by filter mask */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, base_effrtr) { + .testcase = 4, + .id = ID | CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG, + .mask = CAN_SFF_MASK, + .exp_num_rx = 4, + .exp_flags = { + 0, + CAN_RTR_FLAG, + CAN_EFF_FLAG, + CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG, + }, +}; + +/* Receive only SFF frames when expecting no EFF flag */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, filter_eff) { + .testcase = 5, + .id = ID, + .mask = CAN_SFF_MASK | CAN_EFF_FLAG, + .exp_num_rx = 2, + .exp_flags = { + 0, + CAN_RTR_FLAG, + }, +}; +/* Receive only EFF frames when filter id and filter mask include EFF flag */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, filter_eff_eff) { + .testcase = 6, + .id = ID | CAN_EFF_FLAG, + .mask = CAN_SFF_MASK | CAN_EFF_FLAG, + .exp_num_rx = 2, + .exp_flags = { + CAN_EFF_FLAG, + CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG, + }, +}; +/* Receive only SFF frames when expecting no EFF flag, ignoring RTR flag */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, filter_eff_rtr) { + .testcase = 7, + .id = ID | CAN_RTR_FLAG, + .mask = CAN_SFF_MASK | CAN_EFF_FLAG, + .exp_num_rx = 2, + .exp_flags = { + 0, + CAN_RTR_FLAG, + }, +}; +/* Receive only EFF frames when filter id and filter mask include EFF flag, + * ignoring RTR flag + */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, filter_eff_effrtr) { + .testcase = 8, + .id = ID | CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG, + .mask = CAN_SFF_MASK | CAN_EFF_FLAG, + .exp_num_rx = 2, + .exp_flags = { + CAN_EFF_FLAG, + CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG, + }, +}; + +/* Receive no remote frames when filtering for no RTR flag */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, filter_rtr) { + .testcase = 9, + .id = ID, + .mask = CAN_SFF_MASK | CAN_RTR_FLAG, + .exp_num_rx = 2, + .exp_flags = { + 0, + CAN_EFF_FLAG, + }, +}; +/* Receive no remote frames when filtering for no RTR flag, ignoring EFF flag */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, filter_rtr_eff) { + .testcase = 10, + .id = ID | CAN_EFF_FLAG, + .mask = CAN_SFF_MASK | CAN_RTR_FLAG, + .exp_num_rx = 2, + .exp_flags = { + 0, + CAN_EFF_FLAG, + }, +}; +/* Receive only remote frames when filter includes RTR flag */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, filter_rtr_rtr) { + .testcase = 11, + .id = ID | CAN_RTR_FLAG, + .mask = CAN_SFF_MASK | CAN_RTR_FLAG, + .exp_num_rx = 2, + .exp_flags = { + CAN_RTR_FLAG, + CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG, + }, +}; +/* Receive only remote frames when filter includes RTR flag, ignoring EFF + * flag + */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, filter_rtr_effrtr) { + .testcase = 12, + .id = ID | CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG, + .mask = CAN_SFF_MASK | CAN_RTR_FLAG, + .exp_num_rx = 2, + .exp_flags = { + CAN_RTR_FLAG, + CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG, + }, +}; + +/* Receive only SFF data frame when filtering for no flags */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, filter_effrtr) { + .testcase = 13, + .id = ID, + .mask = CAN_SFF_MASK | CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG, + .exp_num_rx = 1, + .exp_flags = { + 0, + }, +}; +/* Receive only EFF data frame when filtering for EFF but no RTR flag */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, filter_effrtr_eff) { + .testcase = 14, + .id = ID | CAN_EFF_FLAG, + .mask = CAN_SFF_MASK | CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG, + .exp_num_rx = 1, + .exp_flags = { + CAN_EFF_FLAG, + }, +}; +/* Receive only SFF remote frame when filtering for RTR but no EFF flag */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, filter_effrtr_rtr) { + .testcase = 15, + .id = ID | CAN_RTR_FLAG, + .mask = CAN_SFF_MASK | CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG, + .exp_num_rx = 1, + .exp_flags = { + CAN_RTR_FLAG, + }, +}; +/* Receive only EFF remote frame when filtering for EFF and RTR flag */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, filter_effrtr_effrtr) { + .testcase = 16, + .id = ID | CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG, + .mask = CAN_SFF_MASK | CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG, + .exp_num_rx = 1, + .exp_flags = { + CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG, + }, +}; + +/* Receive only SFF data frame when filtering for no EFF flag and no RTR flag + * but based on EFF mask + */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, eff) { + .testcase = 17, + .id = ID, + .mask = CAN_EFF_MASK | CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG, + .exp_num_rx = 1, + .exp_flags = { + 0, + }, +}; +/* Receive only EFF data frame when filtering for EFF flag and no RTR flag but + * based on EFF mask + */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, eff_eff) { + .testcase = 18, + .id = ID | CAN_EFF_FLAG, + .mask = CAN_EFF_MASK | CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG, + .exp_num_rx = 1, + .exp_flags = { + CAN_EFF_FLAG, + }, +}; + +/* This test verifies that the raw CAN filters work, by checking if only frames + * with the expected set of flags are received. For each test case, the given + * filter (id and mask) is added and four CAN frames are sent with every + * combination of set/unset EFF/RTR flags. + */ +TEST_F(can_filters, test_filter) +{ + struct can_filter rfilter; + int ret; + + rfilter.can_id = variant->id; + rfilter.can_mask = variant->mask; + setsockopt(self->sock, SOL_CAN_RAW, CAN_RAW_FILTER, + &rfilter, sizeof(rfilter)); + + TH_LOG("filters: can_id = 0x%08X can_mask = 0x%08X", + rfilter.can_id, rfilter.can_mask); + + ret = send_can_frames(self->sock, variant->testcase); + ASSERT_EQ(0, ret) + TH_LOG("failed to send CAN frames"); + + for (int i = 0; i <= variant->exp_num_rx; i++) { + struct can_frame frame; + struct timeval tv; + fd_set rdfs; + + FD_ZERO(&rdfs); + FD_SET(self->sock, &rdfs); + tv.tv_sec = 0; + tv.tv_usec = 50000; /* 50ms timeout */ + + ret = select(self->sock + 1, &rdfs, NULL, NULL, &tv); + ASSERT_LE(0, ret) + TH_LOG("failed select for frame %d, err: %d)", i, errno); + + ret = FD_ISSET(self->sock, &rdfs); + if (i == variant->exp_num_rx) { + ASSERT_EQ(0, ret) + TH_LOG("too many frames received"); + } else { + ASSERT_NE(0, ret) + TH_LOG("too few frames received"); + + ret = read(self->sock, &frame, sizeof(frame)); + ASSERT_LE(0, ret) + TH_LOG("failed to read frame %d, err: %d", i, errno); + + TH_LOG("rx: can_id = 0x%08X rx = %d", frame.can_id, i); + + ASSERT_EQ(ID, frame.can_id & CAN_SFF_MASK) + TH_LOG("received wrong can_id"); + ASSERT_EQ(variant->testcase, frame.data[0]) + TH_LOG("received wrong test case"); + + ASSERT_EQ(frame.can_id & ~CAN_ERR_MASK, + variant->exp_flags[i]) + TH_LOG("received unexpected flags"); + + } + } +} + +int main(int argc, char **argv) +{ + char *ifname = getenv("VCANIF"); + + if (ifname) { + strncpy(VCANIF, ifname, sizeof(VCANIF) - 1); + } else { + printf("VCANIF environment variable must contain the test interface\n"); + return KSFT_FAIL; + } + + return test_harness_run(argc, argv); +} diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/can/test_raw_filter.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/can/test_raw_filter.sh new file mode 100755 index 000000000000..95f45c3c824b --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/can/test_raw_filter.sh @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +#!/bin/bash +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +ALL_TESTS=" + test_raw_filter +" + +net_dir=$(dirname $0)/.. +source $net_dir/lib.sh + +export VCANIF="vcan0" + +setup() +{ + ip link add name $VCANIF type vcan || exit $ksft_skip + ip link set dev $VCANIF up + pwd +} + +cleanup() +{ + ip link delete $VCANIF +} + +test_raw_filter() +{ + ./test_raw_filter + check_err $? + log_test "test_raw_filter" +} + +trap cleanup EXIT +setup + +tests_run + +exit $EXIT_STATUS
Hi Felix,
On Sat. 10 May 2025 at 00:07, Felix Maurer fmaurer@redhat.com wrote:
Tests for the can subsystem have been in the can-tests repository[1] so far. Start moving the tests to kernel selftests by importing the current tst-filter test. The test is now named test_raw_filter and is substantially updated to be more aligned with the kernel selftests, follow the coding style, and simplify the validation of received CAN frames. We also include documentation of the test design. The test verifies that the single filters on raw CAN sockets work as expected.
We intend to import more tests from can-tests and add additional test cases in the future. The goal of moving the CAN selftests into the tree is to align the tests more closely with the kernel, improve testing of CAN in general, and to simplify running the tests automatically in the various kernel CI systems.
Signed-off-by: Felix Maurer fmaurer@redhat.com
Thanks again.
I left a set of nitpicks, I expect to give my reviewed-by tag on the next version.
Notes: I keep netdev and its reviewers and maintainers in CC because of the changes to their paths in MAINTAINERS, even though Jakub acked them on v1. The change should be merged through linux-can-next and subsequent changes will not go to netdev anymore.
I have removed the long form of the licenses in the beginning of the file during the import, as that is covered by the SPDX line anyways. The copyright is left as it was originally.
Ack.
Changes to v1: - link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/cover.1745323279.git.fmaurer@redhat.com/ - Squashed import and rewrite into a single commit - Simplified checking of the received flags - Pass the interface name through env (easier with the selftest framework than adding an argument) I have not updated test_raw_filter.sh to work with physical CAN interfaces so far because I don't have one to test this right now and don't think it's a priority for selftests for now.
OK but can you just:
s/VCANIF/CANIF/g
in the .sh and in the .c files? This way, when the test gets updated to also support the physical interfaces, the patch diff will be smaller.
I have the hardware, so it is something I can easily contribute.
MAINTAINERS | 2 + tools/testing/selftests/Makefile | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/net/can/.gitignore | 2 + tools/testing/selftests/net/can/Makefile | 11 + .../selftests/net/can/test_raw_filter.c | 395 ++++++++++++++++++ .../selftests/net/can/test_raw_filter.sh | 37 ++ 6 files changed, 448 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/net/can/.gitignore create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/net/can/Makefile create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/net/can/test_raw_filter.c create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/net/can/test_raw_filter.sh
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 241ca9e260a2..55749b492ebb 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -5155,6 +5155,7 @@ F: include/uapi/linux/can/isotp.h F: include/uapi/linux/can/raw.h F: net/can/ F: net/sched/em_canid.c +F: tools/testing/selftests/net/can/
CAN-J1939 NETWORK LAYER M: Robin van der Gracht robin@protonic.nl @@ -16577,6 +16578,7 @@ X: net/ceph/ X: net/mac80211/ X: net/rfkill/ X: net/wireless/ +X: tools/testing/selftests/net/can/
NETWORKING [IPSEC] M: Steffen Klassert steffen.klassert@secunet.com diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile index 8daac70c2f9d..e5c9ecd52b73 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ TARGETS += mqueue TARGETS += nci TARGETS += net TARGETS += net/af_unix +TARGETS += net/can TARGETS += net/forwarding TARGETS += net/hsr TARGETS += net/mptcp diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/can/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/net/can/.gitignore new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..764a53fc837f --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/can/.gitignore @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +test_raw_filter diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/can/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/net/can/Makefile new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..5b82e60a03e7 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/can/Makefile @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+top_srcdir = ../../../../..
+CFLAGS += -Wall -Wl,--no-as-needed -O2 -g -I$(top_srcdir)/usr/include $(KHDR_INCLUDES)
+TEST_PROGS := test_raw_filter.sh
+TEST_GEN_FILES := test_raw_filter
+include ../../lib.mk diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/can/test_raw_filter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/can/test_raw_filter.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..3c0e43cab1e8 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/can/test_raw_filter.c @@ -0,0 +1,395 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-3-Clause) +/*
- Copyright (c) 2011 Volkswagen Group Electronic Research
- All rights reserved.
- */
+#include <stdio.h> +#include <stdlib.h> +#include <unistd.h> +#include <string.h>
+#include <sys/types.h> +#include <sys/socket.h> +#include <sys/ioctl.h> +#include <sys/time.h> +#include <net/if.h> +#include <linux/if.h>
+#include <linux/can.h> +#include <linux/can/raw.h>
+#include "../../kselftest_harness.h"
+#define ID 0x123
+char VCANIF[IFNAMSIZ];
+static int send_can_frames(int sock, int testcase) +{
struct can_frame frame;frame.can_dlc = 1;frame.data[0] = testcase;frame.can_id = ID;if (write(sock, &frame, sizeof(frame)) < 0)goto write_err;frame.can_id = (ID | CAN_RTR_FLAG);if (write(sock, &frame, sizeof(frame)) < 0)goto write_err;frame.can_id = (ID | CAN_EFF_FLAG);if (write(sock, &frame, sizeof(frame)) < 0)goto write_err;frame.can_id = (ID | CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG);if (write(sock, &frame, sizeof(frame)) < 0)goto write_err;return 0;+write_err:
perror("write");return 1;
Nitpick: remove the empty line.
+}
+FIXTURE(can_filters) {
int sock;+};
+FIXTURE_SETUP(can_filters) +{
struct sockaddr_can addr;struct ifreq ifr;int recv_own_msgs = 1;int s, ret;s = socket(PF_CAN, SOCK_RAW, CAN_RAW);ASSERT_LT(0, s)
0 is a valid fd (OK it is used for the stout, so your code will work, but the comparison still looks unnatural).
What about:
ASSERT_NE(s, -1)
or:
ASSERT_GE(s, 0)
?
(same comment for the other ASSERT_LE)
TH_LOG("failed to create CAN_RAW socket: %d", errno);strncpy(ifr.ifr_name, VCANIF, sizeof(ifr.ifr_name));ret = ioctl(s, SIOCGIFINDEX, &ifr);ASSERT_LE(0, ret)TH_LOG("failed SIOCGIFINDEX: %d", errno);addr.can_family = AF_CAN;addr.can_ifindex = ifr.ifr_ifindex;setsockopt(s, SOL_CAN_RAW, CAN_RAW_RECV_OWN_MSGS,&recv_own_msgs, sizeof(recv_own_msgs));ret = bind(s, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, sizeof(addr));ASSERT_EQ(0, ret)TH_LOG("failed bind socket: %d", errno);self->sock = s;+}
+FIXTURE_TEARDOWN(can_filters) +{
close(self->sock);+}
+FIXTURE_VARIANT(can_filters) {
int testcase;canid_t id;canid_t mask;int exp_num_rx;canid_t exp_flags[];+}; +#define T_EFF (CAN_EFF_FLAG >> 28) +#define T_RTR (CAN_RTR_FLAG >> 28)
These two macros are not needed anymore and can be removed.
+/* Receive all frames when filtering for the ID in standard frame format */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, base) {
.testcase = 1,.id = ID,.mask = CAN_SFF_MASK,.exp_num_rx = 4,.exp_flags = {0,CAN_RTR_FLAG,CAN_EFF_FLAG,CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG,},+}; +/* Ignore EFF flag in filter ID if not covered by filter mask */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, base_eff) {
.testcase = 2,.id = ID | CAN_EFF_FLAG,.mask = CAN_SFF_MASK,.exp_num_rx = 4,.exp_flags = {0,CAN_RTR_FLAG,CAN_EFF_FLAG,CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG,},+}; +/* Ignore RTR flag in filter ID if not covered by filter mask */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, base_rtr) {
.testcase = 3,.id = ID | CAN_RTR_FLAG,.mask = CAN_SFF_MASK,.exp_num_rx = 4,.exp_flags = {0,CAN_RTR_FLAG,CAN_EFF_FLAG,CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG,},+}; +/* Ignore EFF and RTR flags in filter ID if not covered by filter mask */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, base_effrtr) {
.testcase = 4,.id = ID | CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG,.mask = CAN_SFF_MASK,.exp_num_rx = 4,.exp_flags = {0,CAN_RTR_FLAG,CAN_EFF_FLAG,CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG,},+};
+/* Receive only SFF frames when expecting no EFF flag */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, filter_eff) {
.testcase = 5,.id = ID,.mask = CAN_SFF_MASK | CAN_EFF_FLAG,.exp_num_rx = 2,.exp_flags = {0,CAN_RTR_FLAG,},+}; +/* Receive only EFF frames when filter id and filter mask include EFF flag */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, filter_eff_eff) {
.testcase = 6,.id = ID | CAN_EFF_FLAG,.mask = CAN_SFF_MASK | CAN_EFF_FLAG,.exp_num_rx = 2,.exp_flags = {CAN_EFF_FLAG,CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG,},+}; +/* Receive only SFF frames when expecting no EFF flag, ignoring RTR flag */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, filter_eff_rtr) {
.testcase = 7,.id = ID | CAN_RTR_FLAG,.mask = CAN_SFF_MASK | CAN_EFF_FLAG,.exp_num_rx = 2,.exp_flags = {0,CAN_RTR_FLAG,},+}; +/* Receive only EFF frames when filter id and filter mask include EFF flag,
- ignoring RTR flag
- */
+FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, filter_eff_effrtr) {
.testcase = 8,.id = ID | CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG,.mask = CAN_SFF_MASK | CAN_EFF_FLAG,.exp_num_rx = 2,.exp_flags = {CAN_EFF_FLAG,CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG,},+};
+/* Receive no remote frames when filtering for no RTR flag */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, filter_rtr) {
.testcase = 9,.id = ID,.mask = CAN_SFF_MASK | CAN_RTR_FLAG,.exp_num_rx = 2,.exp_flags = {0,CAN_EFF_FLAG,},+};
Nitpick: sometimes you have an empty line between the fixtures, sometimes you don't. Can you rationalize this and always have an empty new line between the fixtures?
+/* Receive no remote frames when filtering for no RTR flag, ignoring EFF flag */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, filter_rtr_eff) {
.testcase = 10,.id = ID | CAN_EFF_FLAG,.mask = CAN_SFF_MASK | CAN_RTR_FLAG,.exp_num_rx = 2,.exp_flags = {0,CAN_EFF_FLAG,},+}; +/* Receive only remote frames when filter includes RTR flag */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, filter_rtr_rtr) {
.testcase = 11,.id = ID | CAN_RTR_FLAG,.mask = CAN_SFF_MASK | CAN_RTR_FLAG,.exp_num_rx = 2,.exp_flags = {CAN_RTR_FLAG,CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG,},+}; +/* Receive only remote frames when filter includes RTR flag, ignoring EFF
- flag
- */
+FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, filter_rtr_effrtr) {
.testcase = 12,.id = ID | CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG,.mask = CAN_SFF_MASK | CAN_RTR_FLAG,.exp_num_rx = 2,.exp_flags = {CAN_RTR_FLAG,CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG,},+};
+/* Receive only SFF data frame when filtering for no flags */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, filter_effrtr) {
.testcase = 13,.id = ID,.mask = CAN_SFF_MASK | CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG,.exp_num_rx = 1,.exp_flags = {0,},+}; +/* Receive only EFF data frame when filtering for EFF but no RTR flag */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, filter_effrtr_eff) {
.testcase = 14,.id = ID | CAN_EFF_FLAG,.mask = CAN_SFF_MASK | CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG,.exp_num_rx = 1,.exp_flags = {CAN_EFF_FLAG,},+}; +/* Receive only SFF remote frame when filtering for RTR but no EFF flag */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, filter_effrtr_rtr) {
.testcase = 15,.id = ID | CAN_RTR_FLAG,.mask = CAN_SFF_MASK | CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG,.exp_num_rx = 1,.exp_flags = {CAN_RTR_FLAG,},+}; +/* Receive only EFF remote frame when filtering for EFF and RTR flag */ +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, filter_effrtr_effrtr) {
.testcase = 16,.id = ID | CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG,.mask = CAN_SFF_MASK | CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG,.exp_num_rx = 1,.exp_flags = {CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG,},+};
+/* Receive only SFF data frame when filtering for no EFF flag and no RTR flag
- but based on EFF mask
- */
+FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, eff) {
.testcase = 17,.id = ID,.mask = CAN_EFF_MASK | CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG,.exp_num_rx = 1,.exp_flags = {0,},+}; +/* Receive only EFF data frame when filtering for EFF flag and no RTR flag but
- based on EFF mask
- */
+FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(can_filters, eff_eff) {
.testcase = 18,.id = ID | CAN_EFF_FLAG,.mask = CAN_EFF_MASK | CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG,.exp_num_rx = 1,.exp_flags = {CAN_EFF_FLAG,},+};
+/* This test verifies that the raw CAN filters work, by checking if only frames
- with the expected set of flags are received. For each test case, the given
- filter (id and mask) is added and four CAN frames are sent with every
- combination of set/unset EFF/RTR flags.
- */
+TEST_F(can_filters, test_filter) +{
struct can_filter rfilter;int ret;rfilter.can_id = variant->id;rfilter.can_mask = variant->mask;setsockopt(self->sock, SOL_CAN_RAW, CAN_RAW_FILTER,&rfilter, sizeof(rfilter));TH_LOG("filters: can_id = 0x%08X can_mask = 0x%08X",rfilter.can_id, rfilter.can_mask);ret = send_can_frames(self->sock, variant->testcase);ASSERT_EQ(0, ret)TH_LOG("failed to send CAN frames");for (int i = 0; i <= variant->exp_num_rx; i++) {struct can_frame frame;struct timeval tv;
Nitpick: you can directly initialize this variable:
struct timeval tv = { .tv_sec = 0, .tv_usec = 50000, /* 50ms timeout */ };
fd_set rdfs;FD_ZERO(&rdfs);FD_SET(self->sock, &rdfs);tv.tv_sec = 0;tv.tv_usec = 50000; /* 50ms timeout */ret = select(self->sock + 1, &rdfs, NULL, NULL, &tv);ASSERT_LE(0, ret)TH_LOG("failed select for frame %d, err: %d)", i, errno);ret = FD_ISSET(self->sock, &rdfs);if (i == variant->exp_num_rx) {ASSERT_EQ(0, ret)TH_LOG("too many frames received");} else {ASSERT_NE(0, ret)TH_LOG("too few frames received");ret = read(self->sock, &frame, sizeof(frame));ASSERT_LE(0, ret)TH_LOG("failed to read frame %d, err: %d", i, errno);TH_LOG("rx: can_id = 0x%08X rx = %d", frame.can_id, i);ASSERT_EQ(ID, frame.can_id & CAN_SFF_MASK)TH_LOG("received wrong can_id");ASSERT_EQ(variant->testcase, frame.data[0])TH_LOG("received wrong test case");ASSERT_EQ(frame.can_id & ~CAN_ERR_MASK,variant->exp_flags[i])TH_LOG("received unexpected flags");
Remove this empty line.
}}+}
+int main(int argc, char **argv) +{
char *ifname = getenv("VCANIF");if (ifname) {strncpy(VCANIF, ifname, sizeof(VCANIF) - 1);} else {printf("VCANIF environment variable must contain the test interface\n");return KSFT_FAIL;}
Nitpick: test the error condition first:
if (!ifname) { printf("VCANIF environment variable must contain the test interface\n"); return KSFT_FAIL; }
strncpy(VCANIF, ifname, sizeof(VCANIF) - 1);
return test_harness_run(argc, argv);+} diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/can/test_raw_filter.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/can/test_raw_filter.sh new file mode 100755 index 000000000000..95f45c3c824b --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/can/test_raw_filter.sh @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +#!/bin/bash +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+ALL_TESTS="
test_raw_filter+"
+net_dir=$(dirname $0)/.. +source $net_dir/lib.sh
+export VCANIF="vcan0"
Could you make it so that if the environment variable is already set, you do not override it?
: ${CANIF:=vcan0} export CANIF
This way, users can easily test other interfaces without having to edit the script.
+setup() +{
ip link add name $VCANIF type vcan || exit $ksft_skipip link set dev $VCANIF uppwd+}
+cleanup() +{
ip link delete $VCANIF+}
+test_raw_filter() +{
./test_raw_filtercheck_err $?log_test "test_raw_filter"+}
+trap cleanup EXIT +setup
+tests_run
+exit $EXIT_STATUS
2.49.0
Hi Vincent,
On 14.05.25 11:47, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
Hi Felix,
On Sat. 10 May 2025 at 00:07, Felix Maurer fmaurer@redhat.com wrote:
Tests for the can subsystem have been in the can-tests repository[1] so far. Start moving the tests to kernel selftests by importing the current tst-filter test. The test is now named test_raw_filter and is substantially updated to be more aligned with the kernel selftests, follow the coding style, and simplify the validation of received CAN frames. We also include documentation of the test design. The test verifies that the single filters on raw CAN sockets work as expected.
We intend to import more tests from can-tests and add additional test cases in the future. The goal of moving the CAN selftests into the tree is to align the tests more closely with the kernel, improve testing of CAN in general, and to simplify running the tests automatically in the various kernel CI systems.
Signed-off-by: Felix Maurer fmaurer@redhat.com
Thanks again.
I left a set of nitpicks, I expect to give my reviewed-by tag on the next version.
Thank you for your feedback. I'll post a new version with the changes included soon.
[...]
+FIXTURE_SETUP(can_filters) +{
struct sockaddr_can addr;struct ifreq ifr;int recv_own_msgs = 1;int s, ret;s = socket(PF_CAN, SOCK_RAW, CAN_RAW);ASSERT_LT(0, s)0 is a valid fd (OK it is used for the stout, so your code will work, but the comparison still looks unnatural).
What about:
ASSERT_NE(s, -1)
or:
ASSERT_GE(s, 0)
?
(same comment for the other ASSERT_LE)
I was a bit hesitant to change the order of expected and seen value for the the assertions because it's documented as ASSERT_*(expected, seen). But it seems to be common in the selftest to not follow this order where assertions are used for error checking and failure message doesn't explicitly say what was expected/seen. I'll take a look at the error checking in the whole file where the more familiar form is with reversed arguments.
Thanks, Felix
linux-kselftest-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Felix Maurer -
Vincent Mailhol