On platform where SVE is supported but there are less than 2 VLs available the signal SVE change test should be skipped instead of failing.
Reported-by: Andre Przywara andre.przywara@arm.com Tested-by: Andre Przywara andre.przywara@arm.com Cc: Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi cristian.marussi@arm.com --- .../arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_sve_change_vl.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_sve_change_vl.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_sve_change_vl.c index bb50b5adbf10..915821375b0a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_sve_change_vl.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/fake_sigreturn_sve_change_vl.c @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ * supported and is expected to segfault. */
+#include <kselftest.h> #include <signal.h> #include <ucontext.h> #include <sys/prctl.h> @@ -40,6 +41,7 @@ static bool sve_get_vls(struct tdescr *td) /* We need at least two VLs */ if (nvls < 2) { fprintf(stderr, "Only %d VL supported\n", nvls); + td->result = KSFT_SKIP; return false; }
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 11:31:49AM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
On platform where SVE is supported but there are less than 2 VLs available the signal SVE change test should be skipped instead of failing.
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org
On Tue, 24 May 2022 11:31:49 +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
On platform where SVE is supported but there are less than 2 VLs available the signal SVE change test should be skipped instead of failing.
Applied to arm64 (for-next/core), thanks!
[1/1] kselftest/arm64: signal: Skip SVE signal test if not enough VLs supported https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/78c09c0f4df8
linux-kselftest-mirror@lists.linaro.org