On 11/23/22 12:25, Maxime Ripard wrote:
The name doesn't really fit the conventions for the other helpers in DRM/KMS, so let's rename it to make it obvious that we allocate a new DRM device.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard maxime@cerno.tech
Although I believe using "drm_device" on the function name is a bit redundant (maybe drm_kunit_helper_alloc_dev or drm_kunit_helper_alloc_device would be cleaner),
Reviewed-by: Maíra Canal mairacanal@riseup.net
Best Regards, - Maíra Canal
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_client_modeset_test.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.c | 4 +++- drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.h | 5 ++++- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_client_modeset_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_client_modeset_test.c index 362a5fbd82f5..e469d1634e2d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_client_modeset_test.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_client_modeset_test.c @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static int drm_client_modeset_test_init(struct kunit *test) test->priv = priv;
- priv->drm = drm_kunit_device_init(test, DRIVER_MODESET, "drm-client-modeset-test");
- priv->drm = drm_kunit_helper_alloc_drm_device(test, DRIVER_MODESET, "drm-client-modeset-test"); KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, priv->drm);
ret = drmm_connector_init(priv->drm, &priv->connector, diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.c index f1662091f250..a4ad030ed101 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.c @@ -36,7 +36,9 @@ static void dev_free(struct kunit_resource *res) root_device_unregister(dev); } -struct drm_device *drm_kunit_device_init(struct kunit *test, u32 features, char *name) +struct drm_device * +drm_kunit_helper_alloc_drm_device(struct kunit *test,
{ struct kunit_dev *kdev; struct drm_device *drm;u32 features, char *name)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.h index 20ab6eec4c89..e9870c7911fe 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.h @@ -6,6 +6,9 @@ struct drm_device; struct kunit; -struct drm_device *drm_kunit_device_init(struct kunit *test, u32 features, char *name); +struct drm_device * +drm_kunit_helper_alloc_drm_device(struct kunit *test,
u32 features,
char *name);
#endif // DRM_KUNIT_HELPERS_H_
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 11:10:02AM -0300, Maíra Canal wrote:
On 11/23/22 12:25, Maxime Ripard wrote:
The name doesn't really fit the conventions for the other helpers in DRM/KMS, so let's rename it to make it obvious that we allocate a new DRM device.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard maxime@cerno.tech
Although I believe using "drm_device" on the function name is a bit redundant (maybe drm_kunit_helper_alloc_dev or drm_kunit_helper_alloc_device would be cleaner),
Yeah, I don't quite like the name either, but we'll need to also allocate a struct device in the next few patches so we need to make the distinction between a struct drm_device and a struct device.
Maxime
linux-kselftest-mirror@lists.linaro.org