From: Li Zhijian lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com

[ Upstream commit 2d82d73da35b72b53fe0d96350a2b8d929d07e42 ]

0Day robot observed that it's easily timeout on a heavy load host. ------------------- # selftests: bpf: test_maps # Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete' # Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete' # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap' # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_percpu' # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_sizes' # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_walk' # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap' # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap_percpu' # Failed sockmap unexpected timeout not ok 3 selftests: bpf: test_maps # exit=1 # selftests: bpf: test_lru_map # nr_cpus:8 ------------------- Since this test will be scheduled by 0Day to a random host that could have only a few cpus(2-8), enlarge the timeout to avoid a false NG report.

In practice, i tried to pin it to only one cpu by 'taskset 0x01 ./test_maps', and knew 10S is likely enough, but i still perfer to a larger value 30.

Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org Acked-by: Song Liu songliubraving@fb.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210820015556.23276-2-lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c index 4e202217fae1..87ba89df9802 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c @@ -796,7 +796,7 @@ static void test_sockmap(int tasks, void *data)

FD_ZERO(&w); FD_SET(sfd[3], &w); - to.tv_sec = 1; + to.tv_sec = 30; to.tv_usec = 0; s = select(sfd[3] + 1, &w, NULL, NULL, &to); if (s == -1) {