On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 19:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.9.9 release. There are 255 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 19 Nov 2020 12:20:51 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.9.9-rc1.g... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.9.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
NOTE: 1) BUG: Invalid wait context on arm64 db410c device while booting. This issue has not reproduced after several testing loops. https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CA+G9fYsk54r9Re4E9BWpqsoxLjpCvxRKFWRgdiKVcPoY...
2) kselftest test suite version upgrade to v5.9
3) While running kselftest netfilter on x86, i386, arm64 and arm devices the following kernel warning was noticed. WARNING: at net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:622 lockdep_nfnl_nft_mutex_not_held+0x19/0x20 [nf_tables] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CA+G9fYvFUpODs+NkSYcnwKnXm62tmP=ksLe...
4)
From this release we have started building kernels with clang-10 toolchain
and testing LTP testsuite on qemu_arm64, qemu_arm, qemu_x86_64 and qemu_i386.
Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------
kernel: 5.9.9-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-5.9.y git commit: fb1622495321923cbb1ae2c6cf2da1e9ca286800 git describe: v5.9.8-256-gfb1622495321 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.9.y/build/v5.9.8-...
No regressions (compared to build v5.9.8)
No fixes (compared to build v5.9.8)
Ran 52946 total tests in the following environments and test suites.
Environments -------------- - dragonboard-410c - hi6220-hikey - i386 - juno-r2 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - nxp-ls2088 - qemu-arm-clang - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-clang - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - x15 - x86 - x86-kasan
Test Suites ----------- * build * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * perf * v4l2-compliance * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cve-tests * network-basic-tests * kselftest * ltp-open-posix-tests * kvm-unit-tests * kunit * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 11:03:55AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 19:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.9.9 release. There are 255 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 19 Nov 2020 12:20:51 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.9.9-rc1.g... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.9.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
Thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.
greg k-h
linux-kselftest-mirror@lists.linaro.org