For consumers wishing to run kunit on real hardware, it would be ideal if the kunit framework and tests supported module-based builds. This is an advantage as it reduces the test task to running "modprobe mytests.ko", and CONFIG_KUNIT* options can be "always on" (or rather "always m"). KUnit based tests will load the kunit module as an implicit dependency.
Alan Maguire (3): kunit: allow kunit tests to be loaded as a module kunit: allow kunit to be loaded as a module kunit: update documentation to describe module-based build
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst | 3 ++- Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst | 3 +++ Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 16 +++++++++++++++ include/kunit/test.h | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- kernel/sysctl-test.c | 6 +++++- kunit/Kconfig | 6 +++--- kunit/Makefile | 9 +++++++++ kunit/assert.c | 8 ++++++++ kunit/example-test.c | 6 +++++- kunit/string-stream-test.c | 9 +++++++-- kunit/string-stream.c | 7 +++++++ kunit/test-test.c | 8 ++++++-- kunit/test.c | 12 +++++++++++ kunit/try-catch.c | 8 ++++++-- lib/Kconfig.debug | 4 ++-- 15 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
as tests are added to kunit, it will become less feasible to execute all built tests together. By supporting modular tests we provide a simple way to do selective execution on a running system; specifying
CONFIG_KUNIT=y CONFIG_KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST=m
...means we can simply "insmod example-test.ko" to run the tests.
To achieve this we need to
o export the required symbols in kunit o support a new way of declaring test suites. Because a module cannot do multiple late_initcall()s, we provide a kunit_test_suites() macro to declare multiple suites within the same module at once.
Signed-off-by: Knut Omang knut.omang@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire alan.maguire@oracle.com --- include/kunit/test.h | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- kernel/sysctl-test.c | 6 +++++- kunit/Kconfig | 4 ++-- kunit/assert.c | 8 ++++++++ kunit/example-test.c | 6 +++++- kunit/string-stream-test.c | 9 +++++++-- kunit/string-stream.c | 7 +++++++ kunit/test-test.c | 8 ++++++-- kunit/test.c | 8 ++++++++ kunit/try-catch.c | 8 ++++++-- lib/Kconfig.debug | 4 ++-- 11 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index dba4830..37a21dd 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ #include <kunit/assert.h> #include <kunit/try-catch.h> #include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/types.h>
@@ -197,31 +198,46 @@ struct kunit { int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite);
/** - * kunit_test_suite() - used to register a &struct kunit_suite with KUnit. + * kunit_test_suites() - used to register &struct kunit_suite suites with KUnit. * - * @suite: a statically allocated &struct kunit_suite. + * @...: a list of statically allocated &struct kunit_suite. * - * Registers @suite with the test framework. See &struct kunit_suite for + * Registers @... suites with the test framework. See &struct kunit_suite for * more information. * - * NOTE: Currently KUnit tests are all run as late_initcalls; this means + * When builtin, KUnit tests are all run as late_initcalls; this means * that they cannot test anything where tests must run at a different init * phase. One significant restriction resulting from this is that KUnit * cannot reliably test anything that is initialize in the late_init phase; * another is that KUnit is useless to test things that need to be run in * an earlier init phase. * + * An alternative is to build the tests as a module. Because modules + * do not support multiple late_initcall()s, we need to initialize an + * array of suites for a module. + * * TODO(brendanhiggins@google.com): Don't run all KUnit tests as * late_initcalls. I have some future work planned to dispatch all KUnit * tests from the same place, and at the very least to do so after * everything else is definitely initialized. */ -#define kunit_test_suite(suite) \ - static int kunit_suite_init##suite(void) \ - { \ - return kunit_run_tests(&suite); \ - } \ - late_initcall(kunit_suite_init##suite) +#define kunit_test_suites(...) \ + static struct kunit_suite *suites[] = { __VA_ARGS__, NULL}; \ + static int kunit_test_suites_init(void) \ + { \ + unsigned int i; \ + for (i = 0; suites[i] != NULL; i++) \ + kunit_run_tests(suites[i]); \ + return 0; \ + } \ + late_initcall(kunit_test_suites_init); \ + static void __exit kunit_test_suites_exit(void) \ + { \ + return; \ + } \ + module_exit(kunit_test_suites_exit) + +#define kunit_test_suite(suite) kunit_test_suites(suite)
/* * Like kunit_alloc_resource() below, but returns the struct kunit_resource diff --git a/kernel/sysctl-test.c b/kernel/sysctl-test.c index 2a63241..15161c5 100644 --- a/kernel/sysctl-test.c +++ b/kernel/sysctl-test.c @@ -389,4 +389,8 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_write_single_greater_int_max( .test_cases = sysctl_test_cases, };
-kunit_test_suite(sysctl_test_suite); +kunit_test_suite(&sysctl_test_suite); + +#ifdef MODULE +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); +#endif /* MODULE */ diff --git a/kunit/Kconfig b/kunit/Kconfig index 8541ef9..f28bf086 100644 --- a/kunit/Kconfig +++ b/kunit/Kconfig @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ config KUNIT Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/.
config KUNIT_TEST - bool "KUnit test for KUnit" + tristate "KUnit test for KUnit" depends on KUNIT help Enables the unit tests for the KUnit test framework. These tests test @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ config KUNIT_TEST expected.
config KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST - bool "Example test for KUnit" + tristate "Example test for KUnit" depends on KUNIT help Enables an example unit test that illustrates some of the basic diff --git a/kunit/assert.c b/kunit/assert.c index 86013d4..92eba2a 100644 --- a/kunit/assert.c +++ b/kunit/assert.c @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ void kunit_base_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, string_stream_add(stream, "%s FAILED at %s:%d\n", expect_or_assert, assert->file, assert->line); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_base_assert_format);
void kunit_assert_print_msg(const struct kunit_assert *assert, struct string_stream *stream) @@ -31,6 +32,7 @@ void kunit_assert_print_msg(const struct kunit_assert *assert, if (assert->message.fmt) string_stream_add(stream, "\n%pV", &assert->message); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_assert_print_msg);
void kunit_fail_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, struct string_stream *stream) @@ -38,6 +40,7 @@ void kunit_fail_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, kunit_base_assert_format(assert, stream); string_stream_add(stream, "%pV", &assert->message); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_fail_assert_format);
void kunit_unary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, struct string_stream *stream) @@ -56,6 +59,7 @@ void kunit_unary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, unary_assert->condition); kunit_assert_print_msg(assert, stream); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_unary_assert_format);
void kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, struct string_stream *stream) @@ -76,6 +80,7 @@ void kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, } kunit_assert_print_msg(assert, stream); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format);
void kunit_binary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, struct string_stream *stream) @@ -97,6 +102,7 @@ void kunit_binary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, binary_assert->right_value); kunit_assert_print_msg(assert, stream); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_binary_assert_format);
void kunit_binary_ptr_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, struct string_stream *stream) @@ -118,6 +124,7 @@ void kunit_binary_ptr_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, binary_assert->right_value); kunit_assert_print_msg(assert, stream); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_binary_ptr_assert_format);
void kunit_binary_str_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, struct string_stream *stream) @@ -139,3 +146,4 @@ void kunit_binary_str_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, binary_assert->right_value); kunit_assert_print_msg(assert, stream); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_binary_str_assert_format); diff --git a/kunit/example-test.c b/kunit/example-test.c index f64a829..6c6a408 100644 --- a/kunit/example-test.c +++ b/kunit/example-test.c @@ -85,4 +85,8 @@ static int example_test_init(struct kunit *test) * This registers the above test suite telling KUnit that this is a suite of * tests that need to be run. */ -kunit_test_suite(example_test_suite); +kunit_test_suite(&example_test_suite); + +#ifdef MODULE +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); +#endif /* MODULE */ diff --git a/kunit/string-stream-test.c b/kunit/string-stream-test.c index 76cc05e..7a3e7a0 100644 --- a/kunit/string-stream-test.c +++ b/kunit/string-stream-test.c @@ -45,8 +45,13 @@ static void string_stream_test_get_string(struct kunit *test) {} };
-static struct kunit_suite string_stream_test_suite = { +struct kunit_suite string_stream_test_suite = { .name = "string-stream-test", .test_cases = string_stream_test_cases }; -kunit_test_suite(string_stream_test_suite); + +kunit_test_suite(&string_stream_test_suite); + +#ifdef MODULE +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); +#endif /* MODULE */ diff --git a/kunit/string-stream.c b/kunit/string-stream.c index e6d17aa..e4f3a97 100644 --- a/kunit/string-stream.c +++ b/kunit/string-stream.c @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ int string_stream_vadd(struct string_stream *stream,
return 0; } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(string_stream_vadd);
int string_stream_add(struct string_stream *stream, const char *fmt, ...) { @@ -112,6 +113,7 @@ int string_stream_add(struct string_stream *stream, const char *fmt, ...)
return result; } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(string_stream_add);
static void string_stream_clear(struct string_stream *stream) { @@ -145,6 +147,7 @@ char *string_stream_get_string(struct string_stream *stream)
return buf; } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(string_stream_get_string);
int string_stream_append(struct string_stream *stream, struct string_stream *other) @@ -158,11 +161,13 @@ int string_stream_append(struct string_stream *stream,
return string_stream_add(stream, other_content); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(string_stream_append);
bool string_stream_is_empty(struct string_stream *stream) { return list_empty(&stream->fragments); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(string_stream_is_empty);
struct string_stream_alloc_context { struct kunit *test; @@ -207,6 +212,7 @@ struct string_stream *alloc_string_stream(struct kunit *test, gfp_t gfp) gfp, &context); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(alloc_string_stream);
int string_stream_destroy(struct string_stream *stream) { @@ -215,3 +221,4 @@ int string_stream_destroy(struct string_stream *stream) string_stream_free, stream); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(string_stream_destroy); diff --git a/kunit/test-test.c b/kunit/test-test.c index 5ebe059..b5fdbe3 100644 --- a/kunit/test-test.c +++ b/kunit/test-test.c @@ -100,7 +100,6 @@ static int kunit_try_catch_test_init(struct kunit *test) .init = kunit_try_catch_test_init, .test_cases = kunit_try_catch_test_cases, }; -kunit_test_suite(kunit_try_catch_test_suite);
/* * Context for testing test managed resources @@ -328,4 +327,9 @@ static void kunit_resource_test_exit(struct kunit *test) .exit = kunit_resource_test_exit, .test_cases = kunit_resource_test_cases, }; -kunit_test_suite(kunit_resource_test_suite); +kunit_test_suites(&kunit_resource_test_suite, + &kunit_try_catch_test_suite); + +#ifdef MODULE +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); +#endif /* MODULE */ diff --git a/kunit/test.c b/kunit/test.c index c83c0fa..e7896f1 100644 --- a/kunit/test.c +++ b/kunit/test.c @@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ void kunit_do_assertion(struct kunit *test, if (assert->type == KUNIT_ASSERTION) kunit_abort(test); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_do_assertion);
void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name) { @@ -179,6 +180,7 @@ void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name) test->name = name; test->success = true; } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_init_test);
/* * Initializes and runs test case. Does not clean up or do post validations. @@ -317,6 +319,7 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
return 0; } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_run_tests);
struct kunit_resource *kunit_alloc_and_get_resource(struct kunit *test, kunit_resource_init_t init, @@ -342,6 +345,7 @@ struct kunit_resource *kunit_alloc_and_get_resource(struct kunit *test,
return res; } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_alloc_and_get_resource);
static void kunit_resource_free(struct kunit *test, struct kunit_resource *res) { @@ -400,6 +404,7 @@ int kunit_resource_destroy(struct kunit *test, kunit_resource_free(test, resource); return 0; } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_resource_destroy);
struct kunit_kmalloc_params { size_t size; @@ -435,6 +440,7 @@ void *kunit_kmalloc(struct kunit *test, size_t size, gfp_t gfp) gfp, ¶ms); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_kmalloc);
void kunit_kfree(struct kunit *test, const void *ptr) { @@ -447,6 +453,7 @@ void kunit_kfree(struct kunit *test, const void *ptr)
WARN_ON(rc); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_kfree);
void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test) { @@ -476,3 +483,4 @@ void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test) kunit_resource_free(test, resource); } } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_cleanup); diff --git a/kunit/try-catch.c b/kunit/try-catch.c index 55686839..a288012 100644 --- a/kunit/try-catch.c +++ b/kunit/try-catch.c @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ void __noreturn kunit_try_catch_throw(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch) try_catch->try_result = -EFAULT; complete_and_exit(try_catch->try_completion, -EFAULT); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_try_catch_throw);
static int kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter(void *data) { @@ -50,6 +51,7 @@ static unsigned long kunit_test_timeout(void) * For more background on this topic, see: * https://mike-bland.com/2011/11/01/small-medium-large.html */ +#ifndef MODULE if (sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs) { /* * If sysctl_hung_task is active, just set the timeout to some @@ -60,9 +62,9 @@ static unsigned long kunit_test_timeout(void) */ timeout_msecs = (sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs - 1) * MSEC_PER_SEC; - } else { + } else +#endif timeout_msecs = 300 * MSEC_PER_SEC; /* 5 min */ - }
return timeout_msecs; } @@ -106,6 +108,7 @@ void kunit_try_catch_run(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch, void *context)
try_catch->catch(try_catch->context); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_try_catch_run);
void kunit_try_catch_init(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch, struct kunit *test, @@ -116,3 +119,4 @@ void kunit_try_catch_init(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch, try_catch->try = try; try_catch->catch = catch; } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_try_catch_init); diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug index a425741..1d1e38d 100644 --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug @@ -1966,10 +1966,10 @@ config TEST_SYSCTL If unsure, say N.
config SYSCTL_KUNIT_TEST - bool "KUnit test for sysctl" + tristate "KUnit test for sysctl" depends on KUNIT help - This builds the proc sysctl unit test, which runs on boot. + This builds the proc sysctl unit test, which runs on boot/module load. Tests the API contract and implementation correctness of sysctl. For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general please refer to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/.
Making kunit itself buildable as a module allows for "always-on" kunit configuration; specifying CONFIG_KUNIT=m means the module is built but only used when loaded. Kunit test modules will load kunit.ko as an implicit dependency, so simply running "modprobe my-kunit-tests" will load the tests along with the kunit module and run them.
Signed-off-by: Knut Omang knut.omang@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire alan.maguire@oracle.com --- kunit/Kconfig | 2 +- kunit/Makefile | 9 +++++++++ kunit/test.c | 4 ++++ 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kunit/Kconfig b/kunit/Kconfig index f28bf086..d84f480 100644 --- a/kunit/Kconfig +++ b/kunit/Kconfig @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ menu "KUnit support"
config KUNIT - bool "Enable support for unit tests (KUnit)" + tristate "Enable support for unit tests (KUnit)" help Enables support for kernel unit tests (KUnit), a lightweight unit testing and mocking framework for the Linux kernel. These tests are diff --git a/kunit/Makefile b/kunit/Makefile index 769d940..932a3f2 100644 --- a/kunit/Makefile +++ b/kunit/Makefile @@ -1,7 +1,16 @@ +ifeq ($(CONFIG_KUNIT),m) +obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT) += kunit.o + +kunit-objs += test.o \ + string-stream.o \ + assert.o \ + try-catch.o +else obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT) += test.o \ string-stream.o \ assert.o \ try-catch.o +endif
obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) += test-test.o \ string-stream-test.o diff --git a/kunit/test.c b/kunit/test.c index e7896f1..6024627 100644 --- a/kunit/test.c +++ b/kunit/test.c @@ -484,3 +484,7 @@ void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test) } } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_cleanup); + +#ifdef MODULE +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); +#endif /* MODULE */
On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 03:43:51PM +0100, Alan Maguire wrote:
Making kunit itself buildable as a module allows for "always-on" kunit configuration; specifying CONFIG_KUNIT=m means the module is built but only used when loaded. Kunit test modules will load kunit.ko as an implicit dependency, so simply running "modprobe my-kunit-tests" will load the tests along with the kunit module and run them.
+#ifdef MODULE
+#endif /* MODULE */
This is strange. Why do you need ifdef?
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 03:43:51PM +0100, Alan Maguire wrote:
Making kunit itself buildable as a module allows for "always-on" kunit configuration; specifying CONFIG_KUNIT=m means the module is built but only used when loaded. Kunit test modules will load kunit.ko as an implicit dependency, so simply running "modprobe my-kunit-tests" will load the tests along with the kunit module and run them.
+#ifdef MODULE
+#endif /* MODULE */
This is strange. Why do you need ifdef?
Ah, this was an incorrect assumption on my part; I thought that declaring a module license for built-in code might trigger a warning during build. I'll remove the #ifdef MODULE around licenses in v3 (v2 has already gone out as I mistakenly initially sent the wrong version of the patches). I've verified that removing it triggers no warnings.
Thanks to you and Randy for spotting this!
Alan
-- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Documentation should describe how to build kunit and tests as modules.
Signed-off-by: Knut Omang knut.omang@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire alan.maguire@oracle.com --- Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst | 3 ++- Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst | 3 +++ Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst index bf20951..ea55b24 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst @@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ Yes, well, mostly.
For the most part, the KUnit core framework (what you use to write the tests) can compile to any architecture; it compiles like just another part of the -kernel and runs when the kernel boots. However, there is some infrastructure, +kernel and runs when the kernel boots, or when built as a module, when the +module is loaded. However, there is some infrastructure, like the KUnit Wrapper (``tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py``) that does not support other architectures.
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst index 26ffb46..7ddc385 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst @@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ to a standalone program that can be run like any other program directly inside of a host operating system; to be clear, it does not require any virtualization support; it is just a regular program.
+Alternatively, kunit and kunit tests can be built as modules and tests will +run when the test module is loaded. + KUnit is fast. Excluding build time, from invocation to completion KUnit can run several dozen tests in only 10 to 20 seconds; this might not sound like a big deal to some people, but having such fast and easy to run tests fundamentally diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst index c6e6963..fa0f03f 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst @@ -539,6 +539,22 @@ Interspersed in the kernel logs you might see the following:
Congratulations, you just ran a KUnit test on the x86 architecture!
+In a similar manner, kunit and kunit tests can also be built as modules, +so if you wanted to run tests in this way you might add the following config +options to your ``.config``: + +.. code-block:: none + + CONFIG_KUNIT=m + CONFIG_KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST=m + +Once the kernel is built and installed, a simple + +.. code-block:: bash + modprobe example-test + +...will run the tests. + Writing new tests for other architectures -----------------------------------------
linux-kselftest-mirror@lists.linaro.org