When memslot_perf_test is run nested, first iteration of test_memslot_rw_loop testcase, sometimes takes more than 2 seconds due to build of shadow page tables.
Following iterations are fast.
To be on the safe side, bump the timeout to 10 seconds.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky mlevitsk@redhat.com --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c index 893366982f77b..e9189cbed4bb6 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c @@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ static bool _guest_should_exit(void) */ static noinline void host_perform_sync(struct sync_area *sync) { - alarm(2); + alarm(10);
atomic_store_explicit(&sync->sync_flag, true, memory_order_release); while (atomic_load_explicit(&sync->sync_flag, memory_order_acquire))
On 04/10/2024 23:01, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
When memslot_perf_test is run nested, first iteration of test_memslot_rw_loop testcase, sometimes takes more than 2 seconds due to build of shadow page tables.
Following iterations are fast.
To be on the safe side, bump the timeout to 10 seconds.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky mlevitsk@redhat.com
I see the issue without this fix.
Tested-by: Liam Merwick liam.merwick@oracle.com Reviewed-by: Liam Merwick liam.merwick@oracle.com
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c index 893366982f77b..e9189cbed4bb6 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c @@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ static bool _guest_should_exit(void) */ static noinline void host_perform_sync(struct sync_area *sync) {
- alarm(2);
- alarm(10);
atomic_store_explicit(&sync->sync_flag, true, memory_order_release); while (atomic_load_explicit(&sync->sync_flag, memory_order_acquire))
On Fri, 04 Oct 2024 18:01:53 -0400, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
When memslot_perf_test is run nested, first iteration of test_memslot_rw_loop testcase, sometimes takes more than 2 seconds due to build of shadow page tables.
Following iterations are fast.
To be on the safe side, bump the timeout to 10 seconds.
[...]
Nice timing (lol), the alarm can also fire spuriously when running selftests on a loaded arm64 host.
Applied to kvm-x86 fixes, thanks!
[1/1] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: increase guest sync timeout https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/7d4e28327d7e
On Wed, Oct 09, 2024, Sean Christopherson wrote:
On Fri, 04 Oct 2024 18:01:53 -0400, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
When memslot_perf_test is run nested, first iteration of test_memslot_rw_loop testcase, sometimes takes more than 2 seconds due to build of shadow page tables.
Following iterations are fast.
To be on the safe side, bump the timeout to 10 seconds.
[...]
Nice timing (lol), the alarm can also fire spuriously when running selftests on a loaded arm64 host.
Applied to kvm-x86 fixes, thanks!
[1/1] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: increase guest sync timeout https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/7d4e28327d7e
FYI, I rebased "fixes" onto 6.12-rc5 to avoid conflicts in other patches, new hash:
[1/1] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: increase guest sync timeout https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/2d0f2a648147
FWIW, I am planning on getting this to Paolo in time for -rc7.
linux-kselftest-mirror@lists.linaro.org