On 17/08/2022 19:46, Mykola Lysenko wrote:

Hi Colin,

Thanks for your patch!

Can you change patch title to "[PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Fix spelling mistake "succesful” (kfunc_call.c)”?

Personally I think the kfunc_call.c part in the title is extraneous, it's clear it's patching that file from the diff and it's not the style I've used of the 3,900+ patches I've had accepted in the kernel.

Colin

Regards, Mykola

...

On Aug 17, 2022, at 1:34 AM, Colin Ian King colin.i.king@gmail.com wrote:

!-------------------------------------------------------------------| This Message Is From an External Sender

|-------------------------------------------------------------------!

There is a spelling mistake in an ASSERT_OK literal string. Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King colin.i.king@gmail.com

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c index 351fafa006fb..eede7c304f86 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static void test_destructive(void) { __u64 save_caps = 0;

• ASSERT_OK(test_destructive_open_and_load(), "succesful_load");

• ASSERT_OK(test_destructive_open_and_load(), "successful_load");

  if (!ASSERT_OK(cap_disable_effective(1ULL << CAP_SYS_BOOT, &save_caps), "drop_caps")) return;

-- 2.37.1