This is a follow up to these three series: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220113165931.451305-1-dlatypov@google.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220118223506.1701553-1-dlatypov@google.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220125210011.3817742-1-dlatypov@google.com/
The two goals of those series were a) reduce the size of struct kunit_assert and friends. (struct kunit_assert went from 48 => 8 bytes on UML.) b) simplify the internal code, mostly by deleting macros
This series goes further a) sizeof(struct kunit_assert) = 0 now b) e.g. we delete another class of macros (KUNIT_INIT_*_ASSERT_STRUCT)
Note: this does change the function signature of kunit_do_failed_assertion, so we'd need to update the rust wrapper in https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/blob/rust/rust/kernel/kunit.rs But otherwise, I don't think this series changes anything on the rust-side.
Daniel Latypov (4): rfc: kunit: remove format func from struct kunit_assert, get it to 0 bytes rfc: kunit: rename base KUNIT_ASSERTION macro to _KUNIT_FAILED rfc: kunit: eliminate KUNIT_INIT_*_ASSERT_STRUCT macros kunit: delcare kunit_assert structs as const
include/kunit/assert.h | 74 ++----------------------- include/kunit/test.h | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- lib/kunit/test.c | 7 ++- 3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 128 deletions(-)
base-commit: e7eaffce47b7db72b077630dbe836f0c4132496d
Each calll to a KUNIT_EXPECT_*() macro creates a local variable which contains a struct kunit_assert.
Normally, we'd hope the compiler would be able to optimize this away, but we've seen cases where it hasn't, see https://groups.google.com/g/kunit-dev/c/i3fZXgvBrfA/m/GbrMNej2BAAJ.
In changes like commit 21957f90b28f ("kunit: split out part of kunit_assert into a static const"), we've moved more and more parts out of struct kunit_assert and its children types (kunit_binary_assert).
This patch removes the final field and gets us to: sizeof(struct kunit_assert) == 0 sizeof(struct kunit_binary_assert) == 24 (on UML x86_64).
This also reduces the amount of macro plumbing going on at the cost of passing in one more arg to the base KUNIT_ASSERTION macro and kunit_do_failed_assertion().
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov dlatypov@google.com --- include/kunit/assert.h | 28 ++++++---------------------- include/kunit/test.h | 17 +++++++++++------ lib/kunit/test.c | 7 ++++--- 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/kunit/assert.h b/include/kunit/assert.h index 4b52e12c2ae8..aab5b1147df9 100644 --- a/include/kunit/assert.h +++ b/include/kunit/assert.h @@ -42,16 +42,15 @@ struct kunit_loc {
/** * struct kunit_assert - Data for printing a failed assertion or expectation. - * @format: a function which formats the data in this kunit_assert to a string. * * Represents a failed expectation/assertion. Contains all the data necessary to * format a string to a user reporting the failure. */ -struct kunit_assert { - void (*format)(const struct kunit_assert *assert, - const struct va_format *message, - struct string_stream *stream); -}; +struct kunit_assert {}; + +typedef void (*assert_format_t)(const struct kunit_assert *assert, + const struct va_format *message, + struct string_stream *stream);
void kunit_assert_prologue(const struct kunit_loc *loc, enum kunit_assert_type type, @@ -71,16 +70,6 @@ void kunit_fail_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, const struct va_format *message, struct string_stream *stream);
-/** - * KUNIT_INIT_FAIL_ASSERT_STRUCT - Initializer for &struct kunit_fail_assert. - * - * Initializes a &struct kunit_fail_assert. Intended to be used in - * KUNIT_EXPECT_* and KUNIT_ASSERT_* macros. - */ -#define KUNIT_INIT_FAIL_ASSERT_STRUCT { \ - .assert = { .format = kunit_fail_assert_format }, \ -} - /** * struct kunit_unary_assert - Represents a KUNIT_{EXPECT|ASSERT}_{TRUE|FALSE} * @assert: The parent of this type. @@ -110,7 +99,6 @@ void kunit_unary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, * KUNIT_EXPECT_* and KUNIT_ASSERT_* macros. */ #define KUNIT_INIT_UNARY_ASSERT_STRUCT(cond, expect_true) { \ - .assert = { .format = kunit_unary_assert_format }, \ .condition = cond, \ .expected_true = expect_true \ } @@ -145,7 +133,6 @@ void kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, * KUNIT_EXPECT_* and KUNIT_ASSERT_* macros. */ #define KUNIT_INIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_STRUCT(txt, val) { \ - .assert = { .format = kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format }, \ .text = txt, \ .value = val \ } @@ -190,7 +177,6 @@ void kunit_binary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, * KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT() - Initializes a binary assert like * kunit_binary_assert, kunit_binary_ptr_assert, etc. * - * @format_func: a function which formats the assert to a string. * @text_: Pointer to a kunit_binary_assert_text. * @left_val: The actual evaluated value of the expression in the left slot. * @right_val: The actual evaluated value of the expression in the right slot. @@ -200,11 +186,9 @@ void kunit_binary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, * fields but with different types for left_val/right_val. * This is ultimately used by binary assertion macros like KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ, etc. */ -#define KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT(format_func, \ - text_, \ +#define KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT(text_, \ left_val, \ right_val) { \ - .assert = { .format = format_func }, \ .text = text_, \ .left_value = left_val, \ .right_value = right_val \ diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index 8ffcd7de9607..6730734a2216 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -509,9 +509,10 @@ void kunit_do_failed_assertion(struct kunit *test, const struct kunit_loc *loc, enum kunit_assert_type type, const struct kunit_assert *assert, + assert_format_t assert_format, const char *fmt, ...);
-#define KUNIT_ASSERTION(test, assert_type, pass, assert_class, INITIALIZER, fmt, ...) do { \ +#define KUNIT_ASSERTION(test, assert_type, pass, assert_class, assert_format, INITIALIZER, fmt, ...) do { \ if (unlikely(!(pass))) { \ static const struct kunit_loc __loc = KUNIT_CURRENT_LOC; \ struct assert_class __assertion = INITIALIZER; \ @@ -519,6 +520,7 @@ void kunit_do_failed_assertion(struct kunit *test, &__loc, \ assert_type, \ &__assertion.assert, \ + assert_format, \ fmt, \ ##__VA_ARGS__); \ } \ @@ -530,7 +532,8 @@ void kunit_do_failed_assertion(struct kunit *test, assert_type, \ false, \ kunit_fail_assert, \ - KUNIT_INIT_FAIL_ASSERT_STRUCT, \ + kunit_fail_assert_format, \ + {}, \ fmt, \ ##__VA_ARGS__)
@@ -561,6 +564,7 @@ void kunit_do_failed_assertion(struct kunit *test, assert_type, \ !!(condition) == !!expected_true, \ kunit_unary_assert, \ + kunit_unary_assert_format, \ KUNIT_INIT_UNARY_ASSERT_STRUCT(#condition, \ expected_true), \ fmt, \ @@ -618,8 +622,8 @@ do { \ assert_type, \ __left op __right, \ assert_class, \ - KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT(format_func, \ - &__text, \ + format_func, \ + KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT(&__text, \ __left, \ __right), \ fmt, \ @@ -676,8 +680,8 @@ do { \ assert_type, \ strcmp(__left, __right) op 0, \ kunit_binary_str_assert, \ - KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT(kunit_binary_str_assert_format,\ - &__text, \ + kunit_binary_str_assert_format, \ + KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT(&__text, \ __left, \ __right), \ fmt, \ @@ -696,6 +700,7 @@ do { \ assert_type, \ !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__ptr), \ kunit_ptr_not_err_assert, \ + kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format, \ KUNIT_INIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_STRUCT(#ptr, \ __ptr), \ fmt, \ diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c index a5053a07409f..3845765e3a80 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static void kunit_print_string_stream(struct kunit *test,
static void kunit_fail(struct kunit *test, const struct kunit_loc *loc, enum kunit_assert_type type, const struct kunit_assert *assert, - const struct va_format *message) + assert_format_t assert_format, const struct va_format *message) { struct string_stream *stream;
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static void kunit_fail(struct kunit *test, const struct kunit_loc *loc, }
kunit_assert_prologue(loc, type, stream); - assert->format(assert, message, stream); + assert_format(assert, message, stream);
kunit_print_string_stream(test, stream);
@@ -285,6 +285,7 @@ void kunit_do_failed_assertion(struct kunit *test, const struct kunit_loc *loc, enum kunit_assert_type type, const struct kunit_assert *assert, + assert_format_t assert_format, const char *fmt, ...) { va_list args; @@ -294,7 +295,7 @@ void kunit_do_failed_assertion(struct kunit *test, message.fmt = fmt; message.va = &args;
- kunit_fail(test, loc, type, assert, &message); + kunit_fail(test, loc, type, assert, assert_format, &message);
va_end(args);
Context: Currently this macro's name, KUNIT_ASSERTION conflicts with the name of an enum whose values are {KUNIT_EXPECTATION, KUNIT_ASSERTION}.
It's hard to think of a better name for the enum, so rename this macro. It's also a bit strange that the macro might do nothing depending on the boolean argument `pass`. Why not have callers check themselves?
This patch: Moves the pass/fail checking into the callers of KUNIT_ASSERTION, so now we only call it when the check has failed. Then we rename the macro the _KUNIT_FAILED() to reflect the new semantics.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov dlatypov@google.com --- include/kunit/test.h | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index 6730734a2216..4a7cb7e72660 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -512,30 +512,27 @@ void kunit_do_failed_assertion(struct kunit *test, assert_format_t assert_format, const char *fmt, ...);
-#define KUNIT_ASSERTION(test, assert_type, pass, assert_class, assert_format, INITIALIZER, fmt, ...) do { \ - if (unlikely(!(pass))) { \ - static const struct kunit_loc __loc = KUNIT_CURRENT_LOC; \ - struct assert_class __assertion = INITIALIZER; \ - kunit_do_failed_assertion(test, \ - &__loc, \ - assert_type, \ - &__assertion.assert, \ - assert_format, \ - fmt, \ - ##__VA_ARGS__); \ - } \ +#define _KUNIT_FAILED(test, assert_type, assert_class, assert_format, INITIALIZER, fmt, ...) do { \ + static const struct kunit_loc __loc = KUNIT_CURRENT_LOC; \ + struct assert_class __assertion = INITIALIZER; \ + kunit_do_failed_assertion(test, \ + &__loc, \ + assert_type, \ + &__assertion.assert, \ + assert_format, \ + fmt, \ + ##__VA_ARGS__); \ } while (0)
#define KUNIT_FAIL_ASSERTION(test, assert_type, fmt, ...) \ - KUNIT_ASSERTION(test, \ - assert_type, \ - false, \ - kunit_fail_assert, \ - kunit_fail_assert_format, \ - {}, \ - fmt, \ - ##__VA_ARGS__) + _KUNIT_FAILED(test, \ + assert_type, \ + kunit_fail_assert, \ + kunit_fail_assert_format, \ + {}, \ + fmt, \ + ##__VA_ARGS__)
/** * KUNIT_FAIL() - Always causes a test to fail when evaluated. @@ -560,15 +557,18 @@ void kunit_do_failed_assertion(struct kunit *test, expected_true, \ fmt, \ ...) \ - KUNIT_ASSERTION(test, \ - assert_type, \ - !!(condition) == !!expected_true, \ - kunit_unary_assert, \ - kunit_unary_assert_format, \ - KUNIT_INIT_UNARY_ASSERT_STRUCT(#condition, \ - expected_true), \ - fmt, \ - ##__VA_ARGS__) +do { \ + if (likely(!!(condition) == !!expected_true)) break; \ + \ + _KUNIT_FAILED(test, \ + assert_type, \ + kunit_unary_assert, \ + kunit_unary_assert_format, \ + KUNIT_INIT_UNARY_ASSERT_STRUCT(#condition, \ + expected_true), \ + fmt, \ + ##__VA_ARGS__); \ +} while(0)
#define KUNIT_TRUE_MSG_ASSERTION(test, assert_type, condition, fmt, ...) \ KUNIT_UNARY_ASSERTION(test, \ @@ -618,16 +618,17 @@ do { \ .right_text = #right, \ }; \ \ - KUNIT_ASSERTION(test, \ - assert_type, \ - __left op __right, \ - assert_class, \ - format_func, \ - KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT(&__text, \ - __left, \ - __right), \ - fmt, \ - ##__VA_ARGS__); \ + if (likely(__left op __right)) break; \ + \ + _KUNIT_FAILED(test, \ + assert_type, \ + assert_class, \ + format_func, \ + KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT(&__text, \ + __left, \ + __right), \ + fmt, \ + ##__VA_ARGS__); \ } while (0)
#define KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION(test, \ @@ -676,16 +677,18 @@ do { \ .right_text = #right, \ }; \ \ - KUNIT_ASSERTION(test, \ - assert_type, \ - strcmp(__left, __right) op 0, \ - kunit_binary_str_assert, \ - kunit_binary_str_assert_format, \ - KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT(&__text, \ - __left, \ - __right), \ - fmt, \ - ##__VA_ARGS__); \ + if (likely(strcmp(__left, __right) op 0)) break; \ + \ + \ + _KUNIT_FAILED(test, \ + assert_type, \ + kunit_binary_str_assert, \ + kunit_binary_str_assert_format, \ + KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT(&__text, \ + __left, \ + __right), \ + fmt, \ + ##__VA_ARGS__); \ } while (0)
#define KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ @@ -696,15 +699,15 @@ do { \ do { \ const typeof(ptr) __ptr = (ptr); \ \ - KUNIT_ASSERTION(test, \ - assert_type, \ - !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__ptr), \ - kunit_ptr_not_err_assert, \ - kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format, \ - KUNIT_INIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_STRUCT(#ptr, \ - __ptr), \ - fmt, \ - ##__VA_ARGS__); \ + if (likely(!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__ptr))) break; \ + \ + _KUNIT_FAILED(test, \ + assert_type, \ + kunit_ptr_not_err_assert, \ + kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format, \ + KUNIT_INIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_STRUCT(#ptr, __ptr), \ + fmt, \ + ##__VA_ARGS__); \ } while (0)
/**
These macros exist because passing an initializer list to other macros is hard.
The goal of these macros is to generate a line like struct $ASSERT_TYPE __assertion = $APPROPRIATE_INITIALIZER; e.g. struct kunit_unary_assertion __assertion = { .condition = "foo()", .expected_true = true };
But the challenge is you can't pass `{.condition=..., .expect_true=...}` as a macro argument, since the comma means you're actually passing two arguments, `{.condition=...` and `.expect_true=....}`. So we'd made custom macros for each different initializer-list shape.
But we can work around this with the following generic macro #define KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(initializers...) { initializers }
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov dlatypov@google.com --- include/kunit/assert.h | 48 ------------------------------------------ include/kunit/test.h | 27 +++++++++++++----------- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/kunit/assert.h b/include/kunit/assert.h index aab5b1147df9..c041cd9fb0d4 100644 --- a/include/kunit/assert.h +++ b/include/kunit/assert.h @@ -90,19 +90,6 @@ void kunit_unary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, const struct va_format *message, struct string_stream *stream);
-/** - * KUNIT_INIT_UNARY_ASSERT_STRUCT() - Initializes &struct kunit_unary_assert. - * @cond: A string representation of the expression asserted true or false. - * @expect_true: True if of type KUNIT_{EXPECT|ASSERT}_TRUE, false otherwise. - * - * Initializes a &struct kunit_unary_assert. Intended to be used in - * KUNIT_EXPECT_* and KUNIT_ASSERT_* macros. - */ -#define KUNIT_INIT_UNARY_ASSERT_STRUCT(cond, expect_true) { \ - .condition = cond, \ - .expected_true = expect_true \ -} - /** * struct kunit_ptr_not_err_assert - An expectation/assertion that a pointer is * not NULL and not a -errno. @@ -123,20 +110,6 @@ void kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, const struct va_format *message, struct string_stream *stream);
-/** - * KUNIT_INIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_ASSERT_STRUCT() - Initializes a - * &struct kunit_ptr_not_err_assert. - * @txt: A string representation of the expression passed to the expectation. - * @val: The actual evaluated pointer value of the expression. - * - * Initializes a &struct kunit_ptr_not_err_assert. Intended to be used in - * KUNIT_EXPECT_* and KUNIT_ASSERT_* macros. - */ -#define KUNIT_INIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_STRUCT(txt, val) { \ - .text = txt, \ - .value = val \ -} - /** * struct kunit_binary_assert_text - holds strings for &struct * kunit_binary_assert and friends to try and make the structs smaller. @@ -173,27 +146,6 @@ void kunit_binary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, const struct va_format *message, struct string_stream *stream);
-/** - * KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT() - Initializes a binary assert like - * kunit_binary_assert, kunit_binary_ptr_assert, etc. - * - * @text_: Pointer to a kunit_binary_assert_text. - * @left_val: The actual evaluated value of the expression in the left slot. - * @right_val: The actual evaluated value of the expression in the right slot. - * - * Initializes a binary assert like kunit_binary_assert, - * kunit_binary_ptr_assert, etc. This relies on these structs having the same - * fields but with different types for left_val/right_val. - * This is ultimately used by binary assertion macros like KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ, etc. - */ -#define KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT(text_, \ - left_val, \ - right_val) { \ - .text = text_, \ - .left_value = left_val, \ - .right_value = right_val \ -} - /** * struct kunit_binary_ptr_assert - An expectation/assertion that compares two * pointer values (for example, KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, foo, bar)). diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index 4a7cb7e72660..e4b54f5d2731 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -551,21 +551,24 @@ void kunit_do_failed_assertion(struct kunit *test, fmt, \ ##__VA_ARGS__)
+/* Helper to safely pass around an initializer list to other macros. */ +#define KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(initializers...) { initializers } + #define KUNIT_UNARY_ASSERTION(test, \ assert_type, \ - condition, \ - expected_true, \ + condition_, \ + expected_true_, \ fmt, \ ...) \ do { \ - if (likely(!!(condition) == !!expected_true)) break; \ + if (likely(!!(condition_) == !!expected_true_)) break; \ \ _KUNIT_FAILED(test, \ assert_type, \ kunit_unary_assert, \ kunit_unary_assert_format, \ - KUNIT_INIT_UNARY_ASSERT_STRUCT(#condition, \ - expected_true), \ + KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.condition=#condition_, \ + .expected_true=expected_true_), \ fmt, \ ##__VA_ARGS__); \ } while(0) @@ -624,9 +627,9 @@ do { \ assert_type, \ assert_class, \ format_func, \ - KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT(&__text, \ - __left, \ - __right), \ + KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = &__text, \ + .left_value = __left, \ + .right_value = __right), \ fmt, \ ##__VA_ARGS__); \ } while (0) @@ -684,9 +687,9 @@ do { \ assert_type, \ kunit_binary_str_assert, \ kunit_binary_str_assert_format, \ - KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT(&__text, \ - __left, \ - __right), \ + KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = &__text, \ + .left_value = __left, \ + .right_value = __right), \ fmt, \ ##__VA_ARGS__); \ } while (0) @@ -705,7 +708,7 @@ do { \ assert_type, \ kunit_ptr_not_err_assert, \ kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format, \ - KUNIT_INIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_STRUCT(#ptr, __ptr), \ + KUNIT_INIT_ASSERT(.text = #ptr, .value = __ptr), \ fmt, \ ##__VA_ARGS__); \ } while (0)
Everywhere we use the assert structs now takes them via const*, as of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/co...
So now let's properly declare the structs as const as well. --- include/kunit/test.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index e4b54f5d2731..fa5955c8b412 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ void kunit_do_failed_assertion(struct kunit *test,
#define _KUNIT_FAILED(test, assert_type, assert_class, assert_format, INITIALIZER, fmt, ...) do { \ static const struct kunit_loc __loc = KUNIT_CURRENT_LOC; \ - struct assert_class __assertion = INITIALIZER; \ + const struct assert_class __assertion = INITIALIZER; \ kunit_do_failed_assertion(test, \ &__loc, \ assert_type, \
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 5:44 PM Daniel Latypov dlatypov@google.com wrote:
Note: this does change the function signature of kunit_do_failed_assertion, so we'd need to update the rust wrapper in https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/blob/rust/rust/kernel/kunit.rs But otherwise, I don't think this series changes anything on the rust-side.
Thanks for the heads up! I can take care of that.
Cheers, Miguel
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 8:56 AM Miguel Ojeda miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 5:44 PM Daniel Latypov dlatypov@google.com wrote:
Note: this does change the function signature of kunit_do_failed_assertion, so we'd need to update the rust wrapper in https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/blob/rust/rust/kernel/kunit.rs But otherwise, I don't think this series changes anything on the rust-side.
Thanks for the heads up! I can take care of that.
FYI This probably won't need to happen soon. I'd mentioned the idea of patch #1, which changes kunit_do_failed_assertion(), and Brendan didn't seem keen on it before.
But the diff should be simple, e.g. just something like this: @@ -38,9 +38,7 @@ }); static CONDITION: &'static $crate::str::CStr = $crate::c_str!(stringify!($cond)); static ASSERTION: UnaryAssert = UnaryAssert($crate::bindings::kunit_unary_assert { - assert: $crate::bindings::kunit_assert { - format: Some($crate::bindings::kunit_unary_assert_format), - }, + assert: $crate::bindings::kunit_assert {}, condition: CONDITION.as_char_ptr(), expected_true: true, }); @@ -67,6 +65,7 @@ core::ptr::addr_of!(LOCATION.0), $crate::bindings::kunit_assert_type_KUNIT_ASSERTION, core::ptr::addr_of!(ASSERTION.0.assert), + Some($crate::bindings::kunit_unary_assert_format), core::ptr::null(), ); }
The only tricky bit will be coordinating the changes :)
Daniel
linux-kselftest-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Daniel Latypov -
Miguel Ojeda