As for kunit_filter_suites(), When the filters arg = NULL, such as the call of kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, "suite2", NULL, NULL, &err) in filter_suites_test() tese case in kunit, both filter_count and parsed_filters will not be initialized.
So it's possible to enter kunit_filter_attr_tests(), and the use of uninitialized parsed_filters will cause below wild-memory-access.
RIP: 0010:kunit_filter_suites+0x780/0xa40 Code: fe ff ff e8 42 87 4d ff 41 83 c6 01 49 83 c5 10 49 89 dc 44 39 74 24 50 0f 8e 81 fe ff ff e8 27 87 4d ff 4c 89 e8 48 c1 e8 03 <66> 42 83 3c 38 00 0f 85 af 01 00 00 49 8b 75 00 49 8b 55 08 4c 89 RSP: 0000:ff1100010743fc38 EFLAGS: 00010203 RAX: 03fc4400041d0ff1 RBX: ff1100010389a900 RCX: ffffffff9f940ad9 RDX: ff11000107429740 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ff110001037ec920 RBP: ff1100010743fd50 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffe21c0020e87f1e R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000032001 R12: ff110001037ec800 R13: 1fe2200020e87f8c R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ff1100011b000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ff11000115201000 CR3: 0000000113066001 CR4: 0000000000771ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? die_addr+0x3c/0xa0 ? exc_general_protection+0x148/0x220 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? kunit_filter_suites+0x779/0xa40 ? kunit_filter_suites+0x780/0xa40 ? kunit_filter_suites+0x779/0xa40 ? __pfx_kunit_filter_suites+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_kfree+0x10/0x10 ? kunit_add_action_or_reset+0x3d/0x50 filter_suites_test+0x1b7/0x440 ? __pfx_filter_suites_test+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx___schedule+0x10/0x10 ? try_to_wake_up+0xa8e/0x1210 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x86/0xe0 ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x10/0x10 ? set_cpus_allowed_ptr+0x7c/0xb0 kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270 ? __kthread_parkme+0xdc/0x160 ? __pfx_kunit_try_run_case+0x10/0x10 kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0 ? __pfx_kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x10/0x10 kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK> Modules linked in: Dumping ftrace buffer: (ftrace buffer empty) ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- RIP: 0010:kunit_filter_suites+0x780/0xa40 Code: fe ff ff e8 42 87 4d ff 41 83 c6 01 49 83 c5 10 49 89 dc 44 39 74 24 50 0f 8e 81 fe ff ff e8 27 87 4d ff 4c 89 e8 48 c1 e8 03 <66> 42 83 3c 38 00 0f 85 af 01 00 00 49 8b 75 00 49 8b 55 08 4c 89 RSP: 0000:ff1100010743fc38 EFLAGS: 00010203 RAX: 03fc4400041d0ff1 RBX: ff1100010389a900 RCX: ffffffff9f940ad9 RDX: ff11000107429740 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ff110001037ec920 RBP: ff1100010743fd50 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffe21c0020e87f1e R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000032001 R12: ff110001037ec800 R13: 1fe2200020e87f8c R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ff1100011b000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ff11000115201000 CR3: 0000000113066001 CR4: 0000000000771ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception Dumping ftrace buffer: (ftrace buffer empty) Kernel Offset: 0x1da00000 from 0xffffffff81000000 (relocation range: 0xffffffff80000000-0xffffffffbfffffff) Rebooting in 1 seconds..
Fixes: 529534e8cba3 ("kunit: Add ability to filter attributes") Signed-off-by: Ruan Jinjie ruanjinjie@huawei.com --- v2: - add fixes tag --- lib/kunit/executor.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c index 483f7b7873a7..5b5bed1efb93 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/executor.c +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c @@ -125,7 +125,8 @@ static struct suite_set kunit_filter_suites(const struct suite_set *suite_set, char *filter_action, int *err) { - int i, j, k, filter_count; + int i, j, k; + int filter_count = 0; struct kunit_suite **copy, *filtered_suite, *new_filtered_suite; struct suite_set filtered; struct kunit_glob_filter parsed_glob;
On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 at 09:00, Ruan Jinjie ruanjinjie@huawei.com wrote:
As for kunit_filter_suites(), When the filters arg = NULL, such as the call of kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, "suite2", NULL, NULL, &err) in filter_suites_test() tese case in kunit, both filter_count and parsed_filters will not be initialized.
So it's possible to enter kunit_filter_attr_tests(), and the use of uninitialized parsed_filters will cause below wild-memory-access.
RIP: 0010:kunit_filter_suites+0x780/0xa40 Code: fe ff ff e8 42 87 4d ff 41 83 c6 01 49 83 c5 10 49 89 dc 44 39 74 24 50 0f 8e 81 fe ff ff e8 27 87 4d ff 4c 89 e8 48 c1 e8 03 <66> 42 83 3c 38 00 0f 85 af 01 00 00 49 8b 75 00 49 8b 55 08 4c 89 RSP: 0000:ff1100010743fc38 EFLAGS: 00010203 RAX: 03fc4400041d0ff1 RBX: ff1100010389a900 RCX: ffffffff9f940ad9 RDX: ff11000107429740 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ff110001037ec920 RBP: ff1100010743fd50 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffe21c0020e87f1e R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000032001 R12: ff110001037ec800 R13: 1fe2200020e87f8c R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ff1100011b000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ff11000115201000 CR3: 0000000113066001 CR4: 0000000000771ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace:
<TASK> ? die_addr+0x3c/0xa0 ? exc_general_protection+0x148/0x220 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? kunit_filter_suites+0x779/0xa40 ? kunit_filter_suites+0x780/0xa40 ? kunit_filter_suites+0x779/0xa40 ? __pfx_kunit_filter_suites+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_kfree+0x10/0x10 ? kunit_add_action_or_reset+0x3d/0x50 filter_suites_test+0x1b7/0x440 ? __pfx_filter_suites_test+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx___schedule+0x10/0x10 ? try_to_wake_up+0xa8e/0x1210 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x86/0xe0 ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x10/0x10 ? set_cpus_allowed_ptr+0x7c/0xb0 kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270 ? __kthread_parkme+0xdc/0x160 ? __pfx_kunit_try_run_case+0x10/0x10 kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0 ? __pfx_kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x10/0x10 kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK> Modules linked in: Dumping ftrace buffer: (ftrace buffer empty) ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- RIP: 0010:kunit_filter_suites+0x780/0xa40 Code: fe ff ff e8 42 87 4d ff 41 83 c6 01 49 83 c5 10 49 89 dc 44 39 74 24 50 0f 8e 81 fe ff ff e8 27 87 4d ff 4c 89 e8 48 c1 e8 03 <66> 42 83 3c 38 00 0f 85 af 01 00 00 49 8b 75 00 49 8b 55 08 4c 89 RSP: 0000:ff1100010743fc38 EFLAGS: 00010203 RAX: 03fc4400041d0ff1 RBX: ff1100010389a900 RCX: ffffffff9f940ad9 RDX: ff11000107429740 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ff110001037ec920 RBP: ff1100010743fd50 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffe21c0020e87f1e R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000032001 R12: ff110001037ec800 R13: 1fe2200020e87f8c R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ff1100011b000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ff11000115201000 CR3: 0000000113066001 CR4: 0000000000771ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception Dumping ftrace buffer: (ftrace buffer empty) Kernel Offset: 0x1da00000 from 0xffffffff81000000 (relocation range: 0xffffffff80000000-0xffffffffbfffffff) Rebooting in 1 seconds..
Fixes: 529534e8cba3 ("kunit: Add ability to filter attributes") Signed-off-by: Ruan Jinjie ruanjinjie@huawei.com
v2:
- add fixes tag
Thanks very much. For some reason, I'm not getting the same crash here (even under KASAN), but this is definitely a real issue.
I know Rae has some smatch warning fixes she was looking at, too, which may or may not be related.
Reviewed-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
Cheers, -- David
lib/kunit/executor.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c index 483f7b7873a7..5b5bed1efb93 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/executor.c +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c @@ -125,7 +125,8 @@ static struct suite_set kunit_filter_suites(const struct suite_set *suite_set, char *filter_action, int *err) {
int i, j, k, filter_count;
int i, j, k;int filter_count = 0; struct kunit_suite **copy, *filtered_suite, *new_filtered_suite; struct suite_set filtered; struct kunit_glob_filter parsed_glob;-- 2.34.1
On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 09:00:03AM +0800, Ruan Jinjie wrote:
As for kunit_filter_suites(), When the filters arg = NULL, such as the call of kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, "suite2", NULL, NULL, &err) in filter_suites_test() tese case in kunit, both filter_count and parsed_filters will not be initialized.
So it's possible to enter kunit_filter_attr_tests(), and the use of uninitialized parsed_filters will cause below wild-memory-access.
RIP: 0010:kunit_filter_suites+0x780/0xa40 Code: fe ff ff e8 42 87 4d ff 41 83 c6 01 49 83 c5 10 49 89 dc 44 39 74 24 50 0f 8e 81 fe ff ff e8 27 87 4d ff 4c 89 e8 48 c1 e8 03 <66> 42 83 3c 38 00 0f 85 af 01 00 00 49 8b 75 00 49 8b 55 08 4c 89 RSP: 0000:ff1100010743fc38 EFLAGS: 00010203 RAX: 03fc4400041d0ff1 RBX: ff1100010389a900 RCX: ffffffff9f940ad9 RDX: ff11000107429740 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ff110001037ec920 RBP: ff1100010743fd50 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffe21c0020e87f1e R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000032001 R12: ff110001037ec800 R13: 1fe2200020e87f8c R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ff1100011b000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ff11000115201000 CR3: 0000000113066001 CR4: 0000000000771ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace:
<TASK> ? die_addr+0x3c/0xa0 ? exc_general_protection+0x148/0x220 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? kunit_filter_suites+0x779/0xa40 ? kunit_filter_suites+0x780/0xa40 ? kunit_filter_suites+0x779/0xa40 ? __pfx_kunit_filter_suites+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_kfree+0x10/0x10 ? kunit_add_action_or_reset+0x3d/0x50 filter_suites_test+0x1b7/0x440 ? __pfx_filter_suites_test+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx___schedule+0x10/0x10 ? try_to_wake_up+0xa8e/0x1210 ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x86/0xe0 ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x10/0x10 ? set_cpus_allowed_ptr+0x7c/0xb0 kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270 ? __kthread_parkme+0xdc/0x160 ? __pfx_kunit_try_run_case+0x10/0x10 kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0 ? __pfx_kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x10/0x10 kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK> Modules linked in: Dumping ftrace buffer: (ftrace buffer empty) ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- RIP: 0010:kunit_filter_suites+0x780/0xa40 Code: fe ff ff e8 42 87 4d ff 41 83 c6 01 49 83 c5 10 49 89 dc 44 39 74 24 50 0f 8e 81 fe ff ff e8 27 87 4d ff 4c 89 e8 48 c1 e8 03 <66> 42 83 3c 38 00 0f 85 af 01 00 00 49 8b 75 00 49 8b 55 08 4c 89 RSP: 0000:ff1100010743fc38 EFLAGS: 00010203 RAX: 03fc4400041d0ff1 RBX: ff1100010389a900 RCX: ffffffff9f940ad9 RDX: ff11000107429740 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ff110001037ec920 RBP: ff1100010743fd50 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffe21c0020e87f1e R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000032001 R12: ff110001037ec800 R13: 1fe2200020e87f8c R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ff1100011b000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ff11000115201000 CR3: 0000000113066001 CR4: 0000000000771ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception Dumping ftrace buffer: (ftrace buffer empty) Kernel Offset: 0x1da00000 from 0xffffffff81000000 (relocation range: 0xffffffff80000000-0xffffffffbfffffff) Rebooting in 1 seconds..
Fixes: 529534e8cba3 ("kunit: Add ability to filter attributes") Signed-off-by: Ruan Jinjie ruanjinjie@huawei.com
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
v2:
- add fixes tag
lib/kunit/executor.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c index 483f7b7873a7..5b5bed1efb93 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/executor.c +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c @@ -125,7 +125,8 @@ static struct suite_set kunit_filter_suites(const struct suite_set *suite_set, char *filter_action, int *err) {
- int i, j, k, filter_count;
- int i, j, k;
- int filter_count = 0; struct kunit_suite **copy, *filtered_suite, *new_filtered_suite; struct suite_set filtered; struct kunit_glob_filter parsed_glob;
-- 2.34.1
linux-kselftest-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
David Gow -
Guenter Roeck -
Ruan Jinjie