The longest length of a symbol (KSYM_NAME_LEN) was increased to 512 in the reference [1]. This patch adds a kunit test to check the longest symbol length.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220802015052.10452-6-ojeda@kernel.org/
Signed-off-by: Sergio González Collado sergio.collado@gmail.com --- lib/Kconfig.debug | 9 +++ lib/Makefile | 1 + lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 130 insertions(+) create mode 100644 lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug index fa307f93fa2e..7c0ae4373aa6 100644 --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug @@ -2760,6 +2760,15 @@ config FORTIFY_KUNIT_TEST by the str*() and mem*() family of functions. For testing runtime traps of FORTIFY_SOURCE, see LKDTM's "FORTIFY_*" tests.
+config LONGEST_SYM_KUNIT_TEST + tristate "Test the longest symbol possible" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + depends on KUNIT && KPROBES + default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + help + Tests the longest symbol possible + + If unsure, say N. + config HW_BREAKPOINT_KUNIT_TEST bool "Test hw_breakpoint constraints accounting" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS depends on HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile index 740109b6e2c8..82ac084b6bc6 100644 --- a/lib/Makefile +++ b/lib/Makefile @@ -402,6 +402,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_FORTIFY_KUNIT_TEST) += fortify_kunit.o obj-$(CONFIG_STRCAT_KUNIT_TEST) += strcat_kunit.o obj-$(CONFIG_STRSCPY_KUNIT_TEST) += strscpy_kunit.o obj-$(CONFIG_SIPHASH_KUNIT_TEST) += siphash_kunit.o +obj-$(CONFIG_LONGEST_SYM_KUNIT_TEST) += longest_symbol_kunit.o
obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_LIB_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED) += devmem_is_allowed.o
diff --git a/lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c b/lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..6282fbb7e991 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Test the longest symbol length. Execute with: + * ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run longest-symbol + * --arch=x86_64 --kconfig_add CONFIG_KPROBES=y --kconfig_add CONFIG_MODULES=y + * --kconfig_add CONFIG_RETPOLINE=n + */ + +#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt + +#include <kunit/test.h> +#include <linux/stringify.h> +#include <linux/kprobes.h> +#include <linux/kallsyms.h> + +#define DI(name) s##name##name +#define DDI(name) DI(n##name##name) +#define DDDI(name) DDI(n##name##name) +#define DDDDI(name) DDDI(n##name##name) +#define DDDDDI(name) DDDDI(n##name##name) + +#define PLUS1(name) __PASTE(name, e) + +/*Generate a symbol whose name length is 511 */ +#define LONGEST_SYM_NAME DDDDDI(g1h2i3j4k5l6m7n) + +/*Generate a symbol whose name length is 512 */ +#define LONGEST_SYM_NAME_PLUS1 PLUS1(LONGEST_SYM_NAME) + +#define RETURN_LONGEST_SYM 0xAAAAA +#define RETURN_LONGEST_SYM_PLUS1 0x55555 + +noinline int LONGEST_SYM_NAME(void) +{ + return RETURN_LONGEST_SYM; +} + +noinline int LONGEST_SYM_NAME_PLUS1(void) +{ + return RETURN_LONGEST_SYM_PLUS1; +} + +_Static_assert(sizeof(__stringify(LONGEST_SYM_NAME)) == KSYM_NAME_LEN, +"Incorrect symbol length found. Expected KSYM_NAME_LEN: " +__stringify(KSYM_NAME) ", but found: " +__stringify(sizeof(LONGEST_SYM_NAME))); + +static void test_longest_symbol(struct kunit *test) +{ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, RETURN_LONGEST_SYM, LONGEST_SYM_NAME()); +}; + +static void test_longest_symbol_kallsyms(struct kunit *test) +{ + unsigned long (*kallsyms_lookup_name)(const char *name); + static int (*longest_sym)(void); + + struct kprobe kp = { + .symbol_name = "kallsyms_lookup_name", + }; + + if (register_kprobe(&kp) < 0) { + pr_info("%s: kprobe not registered\n", __func__); + KUNIT_FAIL(test, "test_longest_symbol kallsysms: kprobe not registered\n"); + return; + } + + kunit_warn(test, "test_longest_symbol kallsyms: kprobe registered\n"); + kallsyms_lookup_name = (unsigned long (*)(const char *name))kp.addr; + unregister_kprobe(&kp); + + longest_sym = + (void *) kallsyms_lookup_name(__stringify(LONGEST_SYM_NAME)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, RETURN_LONGEST_SYM, longest_sym()); +}; + +static void test_longest_symbol_plus1(struct kunit *test) +{ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, RETURN_LONGEST_SYM_PLUS1, LONGEST_SYM_NAME_PLUS1()); +}; + +static void test_longest_symbol_plus1_kallsyms(struct kunit *test) +{ + unsigned long (*kallsyms_lookup_name)(const char *name); + static int (*longest_sym_plus1)(void); + + struct kprobe kp = { + .symbol_name = "kallsyms_lookup_name", + }; + + if (register_kprobe(&kp) < 0) { + pr_info("%s: kprobe not registered\n", __func__); + KUNIT_FAIL(test, "test_longest_symbol kallsysms: kprobe not registered\n"); + return; + } + + kunit_warn(test, "test_longest_symbol_plus1 kallsyms: kprobe registered\n"); + kallsyms_lookup_name = (unsigned long (*)(const char *name))kp.addr; + unregister_kprobe(&kp); + + longest_sym_plus1 = + (void *) kallsyms_lookup_name(__stringify(LONGEST_SYM_NAME_PLUS1)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL(test, longest_sym_plus1); +}; + +static struct kunit_case longest_symbol_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(test_longest_symbol), + KUNIT_CASE(test_longest_symbol_kallsyms), + KUNIT_CASE(test_longest_symbol_plus1), + KUNIT_CASE(test_longest_symbol_plus1_kallsyms), + {} +}; + +static struct kunit_suite longest_symbol_test_suite = { + .name = "longest-symbol", + .test_cases = longest_symbol_test_cases, +}; +kunit_test_suite(longest_symbol_test_suite); + +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
On 11/5/23 15:40, Sergio González Collado wrote:
The longest length of a symbol (KSYM_NAME_LEN) was increased to 512 in the reference [1]. This patch adds a kunit test to check the longest symbol length.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220802015052.10452-6-ojeda@kernel.org/
Signed-off-by: Sergio González Collado sergio.collado@gmail.com
[...]
Alles gut!
Tested-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo yakoyoku@gmail.com
On 05.11.23 19:40, Sergio González Collado wrote:
The longest length of a symbol (KSYM_NAME_LEN) was increased to 512 in the reference [1]. This patch adds a kunit test to check the longest symbol length.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220802015052.10452-6-ojeda@kernel.org/
Signed-off-by: Sergio González Collado sergio.collado@gmail.com
lib/Kconfig.debug | 9 +++ lib/Makefile | 1 + lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 130 insertions(+) create mode 100644 lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c
I am a bit confused why this is *only* sent to the rust-for-linux list. Especially since there is no rust code and the changes do not change anything that Rust code uses.
Shouldn't this go to linux-kernel list and the maintainers of lib/Makefile instead?
On 05.11.23 21:33, Benno Lossin wrote:
On 05.11.23 19:40, Sergio González Collado wrote:
The longest length of a symbol (KSYM_NAME_LEN) was increased to 512 in the reference [1]. This patch adds a kunit test to check the longest symbol length.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220802015052.10452-6-ojeda@kernel.org/
Signed-off-by: Sergio González Collado sergio.collado@gmail.com
lib/Kconfig.debug | 9 +++ lib/Makefile | 1 + lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 130 insertions(+) create mode 100644 lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c
I am a bit confused why this is *only* sent to the rust-for-linux list. Especially since there is no rust code and the changes do not change anything that Rust code uses.
Shouldn't this go to linux-kernel list and the maintainers of lib/Makefile instead?
Seems I missed the "To: linux-kself" and others, sorry for the noise.
Hi Sergio,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master] [also build test ERROR on v6.6 next-20231106] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Sergio-Gonz-lez-Collado/Kunit... base: linus/master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231105184010.49194-1-sergio.collado%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH] Kunit to check the longest symbol length config: i386-randconfig-014-20231106 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231107/202311070705.7aFWz7q4-lkp@i...) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231107/202311070705.7aFWz7q4-lkp@i...)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311070705.7aFWz7q4-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test: error: malformed line 1810458:
7nnnnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m
Hi Sergio,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on linus/master] [also build test WARNING on v6.6 next-20231107] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Sergio-Gonz-lez-Collado/Kunit... base: linus/master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231105184010.49194-1-sergio.collado%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH] Kunit to check the longest symbol length config: sparc-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231108/202311080319.fCEp5dTC-lkp@i...) compiler: sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231108/202311080319.fCEp5dTC-lkp@i...)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311080319.fCEp5dTC-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:16:18: warning: no previous prototype for 'snnnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnnnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7n' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
16 | #define DI(name) s##name##name | ^ lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:17:19: note: in expansion of macro 'DI' 17 | #define DDI(name) DI(n##name##name) | ^~ lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:18:20: note: in expansion of macro 'DDI' 18 | #define DDDI(name) DDI(n##name##name) | ^~~ lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:19:21: note: in expansion of macro 'DDDI' 19 | #define DDDDI(name) DDDI(n##name##name) | ^~~~ lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:20:22: note: in expansion of macro 'DDDDI' 20 | #define DDDDDI(name) DDDDI(n##name##name) | ^~~~~ lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:25:27: note: in expansion of macro 'DDDDDI' 25 | #define LONGEST_SYM_NAME DDDDDI(g1h2i3j4k5l6m7n) | ^~~~~~ lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:33:14: note: in expansion of macro 'LONGEST_SYM_NAME' 33 | noinline int LONGEST_SYM_NAME(void) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from <command-line>: lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:16:18: warning: no previous prototype for 'snnnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnnnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ne' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 16 | #define DI(name) s##name##name | ^ include/linux/compiler_types.h:83:23: note: in definition of macro '___PASTE' 83 | #define ___PASTE(a,b) a##b | ^ lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:22:21: note: in expansion of macro '__PASTE' 22 | #define PLUS1(name) __PASTE(name, e) | ^~~~~~~ lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:28:32: note: in expansion of macro 'PLUS1' 28 | #define LONGEST_SYM_NAME_PLUS1 PLUS1(LONGEST_SYM_NAME) | ^~~~~ lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:17:19: note: in expansion of macro 'DI' 17 | #define DDI(name) DI(n##name##name) | ^~ lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:18:20: note: in expansion of macro 'DDI' 18 | #define DDDI(name) DDI(n##name##name) | ^~~ lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:19:21: note: in expansion of macro 'DDDI' 19 | #define DDDDI(name) DDDI(n##name##name) | ^~~~ lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:20:22: note: in expansion of macro 'DDDDI' 20 | #define DDDDDI(name) DDDDI(n##name##name) | ^~~~~ lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:25:27: note: in expansion of macro 'DDDDDI' 25 | #define LONGEST_SYM_NAME DDDDDI(g1h2i3j4k5l6m7n) | ^~~~~~ lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:28:38: note: in expansion of macro 'LONGEST_SYM_NAME' 28 | #define LONGEST_SYM_NAME_PLUS1 PLUS1(LONGEST_SYM_NAME) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:38:14: note: in expansion of macro 'LONGEST_SYM_NAME_PLUS1' 38 | noinline int LONGEST_SYM_NAME_PLUS1(void) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/snnnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnnnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7n +16 lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c
15
16 #define DI(name) s##name##name
17 #define DDI(name) DI(n##name##name) 18 #define DDDI(name) DDI(n##name##name) 19 #define DDDDI(name) DDDI(n##name##name) 20 #define DDDDDI(name) DDDDI(n##name##name) 21
On 11/5/23 15:40, Sergio González Collado wrote:
[...] diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile index 740109b6e2c8..82ac084b6bc6 100644 --- a/lib/Makefile +++ b/lib/Makefile @@ -402,6 +402,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_FORTIFY_KUNIT_TEST) += fortify_kunit.o obj-$(CONFIG_STRCAT_KUNIT_TEST) += strcat_kunit.o obj-$(CONFIG_STRSCPY_KUNIT_TEST) += strscpy_kunit.o obj-$(CONFIG_SIPHASH_KUNIT_TEST) += siphash_kunit.o +obj-$(CONFIG_LONGEST_SYM_KUNIT_TEST) += longest_symbol_kunit.o obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_LIB_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED) += devmem_is_allowed.o
This test is triggering `-Wmissing-prototypes`, so you might have to either add the prototypes or change the hunk to this.
diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile index 740109b6e2c8..b9d2577fbbe1 100644 --- a/lib/Makefile +++ b/lib/Makefile @@ -402,6 +402,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_FORTIFY_KUNIT_TEST) += fortify_kunit.o obj-$(CONFIG_STRCAT_KUNIT_TEST) += strcat_kunit.o obj-$(CONFIG_STRSCPY_KUNIT_TEST) += strscpy_kunit.o obj-$(CONFIG_SIPHASH_KUNIT_TEST) += siphash_kunit.o +obj-$(CONFIG_LONGEST_SYM_KUNIT_TEST) += longest_symbol_kunit.o +CFLAGS_longest_symbol_kunit.o += $(call cc-disable-warning, missing-prototypes)
obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_LIB_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED) += devmem_is_allowed.o
diff --git a/lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c b/lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..6282fbb7e991 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c [...]
+noinline int LONGEST_SYM_NAME(void) +{
- return RETURN_LONGEST_SYM;
+}
+noinline int LONGEST_SYM_NAME_PLUS1(void) +{
- return RETURN_LONGEST_SYM_PLUS1;
+}
arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c has a buffer size of 256 that might be too short for these symbols, you might have to increase it for it to work.
[...]
linux-kselftest-mirror@lists.linaro.org