Clean up two build warnings:
[1]: iou-zcrx.c: In function ‘process_recvzc’: iou-zcrx.c:263:37: warning: too many arguments for format [-Wformat-extra-args] 263 | error(1, 0, "payload mismatch at ", i); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[2]: iou-zcrx.c: In function ‘run_client’: iou-zcrx.c:357:47: warning: format ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but argument 4 has type ‘ssize_t’ {aka ‘long int’} [-Wformat=] 357 | error(1, 0, "send(): %d", sent); | ~^ ~~~~ | | | | int ssize_t {aka long int} | %ld
Signed-off-by: Haiyue Wang haiyuewa@163.com --- tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/iou-zcrx.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/iou-zcrx.c b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/iou-zcrx.c index c26b4180eddd..19e1ff45deb4 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/iou-zcrx.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/iou-zcrx.c @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static void process_recvzc(struct io_uring *ring, struct io_uring_cqe *cqe)
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { if (*(data + i) != payload[(received + i)]) - error(1, 0, "payload mismatch at ", i); + error(1, 0, "payload mismatch at %d", i); } received += n;
@@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ static void run_client(void) chunk = min_t(ssize_t, cfg_payload_len, to_send); res = send(fd, src, chunk, 0); if (res < 0) - error(1, 0, "send(): %d", sent); + error(1, 0, "send(): %ld", sent); sent += res; to_send -= res; }
On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 12:22:20PM +0800, Haiyue Wang wrote:
Clean up two build warnings:
[1]: iou-zcrx.c: In function ‘process_recvzc’: iou-zcrx.c:263:37: warning: too many arguments for format [-Wformat-extra-args] 263 | error(1, 0, "payload mismatch at ", i); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[2]: iou-zcrx.c: In function ‘run_client’: iou-zcrx.c:357:47: warning: format ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but argument 4 has type ‘ssize_t’ {aka ‘long int’} [-Wformat=] 357 | error(1, 0, "send(): %d", sent); | ~^ ~~~~ | | | | int ssize_t {aka long int} | %ld
Signed-off-by: Haiyue Wang haiyuewa@163.com
Hi Haiyue Wang,
This feels more like a clean-up for net-next than a bug-fix to net.
tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/iou-zcrx.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/iou-zcrx.c b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/iou-zcrx.c index c26b4180eddd..19e1ff45deb4 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/iou-zcrx.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/iou-zcrx.c @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static void process_recvzc(struct io_uring *ring, struct io_uring_cqe *cqe) for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { if (*(data + i) != payload[(received + i)])
error(1, 0, "payload mismatch at ", i);
} received += n;error(1, 0, "payload mismatch at %d", i);
@@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ static void run_client(void) chunk = min_t(ssize_t, cfg_payload_len, to_send); res = send(fd, src, chunk, 0); if (res < 0)
error(1, 0, "send(): %d", sent);
error(1, 0, "send(): %ld", sent);
As the type of sent is ssize_t I think that "%zd" would be best here.
sent += res; to_send -= res;
}
2.49.0
linux-kselftest-mirror@lists.linaro.org